Ski jackets get all the glory, but a pair of quality pants is equally important for keeping you warm and dry on the slopes. Today’s designs range from waterproof and insulated resort options to full-coverage bibs and stretch-infused offerings built for the rigors of uphill travel. Most of the models here come fully dialed in with ski-specific features, including upper leg vents, an assortment of pockets, burly scuff guards, built-in gaiters, and more. Below is our list of the best women’s ski pants for the 2022 season, along with a comparison table and buying advice below the picks. To complete your kit, check out our article on the best women’s ski jackets.
Our Team's Women's Ski Pant Picks
- Best Overall Ski Pant: Arc'teryx Sentinel AR
- Best Insulated Ski Pant: Patagonia Insulated Powder Bowl
- Best Budget Ski Pant: The North Face Freedom Insulated
- Best Backcountry Ski Pant: Outdoor Research Skyward II
- Best Women's Ski Bib: Flylow Gear Foxy Bib
- Best Slim-Fitting Pant for Resort Skiing: Roxy Rising High
Best for: Resort/backcountry
Insulated: No (thin fleece backer)
What we like: Top-notch build quality and fit.
What we don’t: Expensive.
Arc’teryx’s ski and outerwear consistently knocks it out of the park in terms of premium quality and performance, and the Sentinel AR pants are no exception. An easy choice for our top pick, the Sentinel checks all the boxes for both resort and backcountry skiing, no matter the weather. In wet and blustery conditions the 3-layer Gore-Tex construction provides a reliable barrier from the elements, while smooth-operating side vents let you dump heat quickly on warm spring days. On top of that, you get a light fleece backer for additional comfort and a touch of warmth, a solid feature set with plenty of storage, and Arc’teryx’s class-leading fit. Added up, it’s the full package for serious skiers who get out a lot.
The Sentinel AR is undeniably spendy, although $549 is fairly par for the course among 3-layer Gore-Tex pants. If you don’t stray from the resort, you can save big with a 2-layer design (the compromises in breathability and bulk aren’t a big deal for inbounds skiing), and many will prefer the added warmth of an insulated pant. On the other hand, dedicated backcountry-goers might want to opt for a stretchy hardshell design like the OR Skyward II below. But for the best of both worlds alongside a truly exceptional fit and finish, the Sentinel AR pants get our top pick for the 2022 season. Keep in mind that Arc’teryx also makes the more backcountry-specific Sentinel LT, which features a trimmer fit and replaces the AR’s fleece backer with Gore’s lighter and more breathable C-Knit.
See the Arc'teryx Sentinel AR
Best Insulated Ski Pant for Women
Best for: Resort
Insulated: Yes (60g Thermogreen)
What we like: Great fit and finish offers insulation without the bulk.
What we don’t: Velcro waist adjustment is stiff and a bit abrasive.
Not everyone will opt for insulated ski pants, but if you frequent the resort in particularly cold climates like the Northeast or the Mountain West, there’s a good chance you’ll want ‘em. With a thin but warm dose of synthetic fill (unlike down, synthetic continues to keep you warm when wet), insulated pants are your ticket to cozying up on a lift ride no matter the conditions. Among the myriad options, Patagonia's Powder Bowl is a standout pick: you get 60-gram Thermogreen fill, sleek and clean styling that minimizes bulk, mesh-lined vents along the outer thighs, and a soft liner for great next-to-skin comfort. Tack on a quality Gore-Tex membrane, and the result is a pair of resort-specific ski pants that can handle brutal mountain weather season after season.
It’s true that $379 is steep for a pair of resort pants, but the good news is that the Powder Bowl Insulated is built to last with a thick 150-denier shell, 50-denier liner, and Patagonia’s excellent attention to detail. In other words, you can expect the Powder Bowl to hold up exceedingly well to all-day weather and countless chairlift rides. On the other hand, if you’re on a budget or only get out a few times a year, it’s worth looking at Patagonia’s popular Insulated Snowbelle pant. The Snowbelle features downgraded materials with a thinner face fabric (75D), less insulation (40g), and a proprietary 2-layer H2No waterproof membrane, but it’s reasonably priced at $199 and comes in seven different colorways. But for the most premium and hardwearing design, look no further than the Powder Bowl here… Read in-depth review
See the Patagonia Insulated Powder Bowl
Best Budget Ski Pant for Women
Best for: Resort
Insulated: Yes (60g Heatseeker)
What we like: Proven and tough resort pant.
What we don’t: Baggy fit isn’t for everyone.
For budget-seekers and those just getting started, The North Face Freedom is a great deal and one of the most popular pants on the slopes. The value is hard to beat: for well under $200, you get a thick 2-layer construction that is super durable and blocks out wind and snow effectively. The 60-gram Heatseeker insulation is a nice touch for those wanting a little extra warmth, and the venting system is surprisingly good for a budget pant (many forgo ventilation altogether). It’s true that the Freedom is a noticeable step down in quality from a design like the Patagonia Insulated Powder Bowl above, but it covers all the bases for many resort riders at a reasonable price.
That said, although the Freedom Insulated will do the trick for casual resort-goers, performance-minded skiers likely will be left wanting more. To start, the fit is pretty generic: there isn’t any stretch built into the fabric, and the pants are quite baggy around the thighs and lower legs. Additionally, it’s easy to overheat with the cheap waterproofing technology, and while we like the zippered vents, their placement along the inner thigh (and the accompanying waterproof flaps) creates extra bulk. Finally, we think TNF could do a lot better with the pockets, which are prohibitively small and oddly placed. But we keep coming back to value: the Freedom pants are a proven choice with a surprisingly long lifespan and undercut most of the competition by $30 or more.
See The North Face Freedom Insulated
Best Backcountry Ski Pant for Women
Best for: Backcountry
Type: Hardshell w/stretch
What we like: Stretchy and breathable but still protective.
What we don’t: A standard hardshell offers a more bombproof barrier.
Most resort-goers prioritize waterproofing and warmth, but uphill-oriented skiers need a pant that’s both highly mobile and breathable. The Skyward II deftly checks those boxes thanks to Outdoor Research’s stretch-infused, 3-layer AscentShell fabric, which protects nearly as well as a hardshell but moves and ventilates like a softshell. It all adds up to a pant that’s capable of resisting heavy wind or wet snow while offering the range of motion and breathability you need for the bootpack or skin track. Outer thigh vents, articulated knees, waist adjustments, and a total of four pockets (including a beacon pocket with clip) round out the build, which is about as good as it gets for most days in the backcountry.
On paper, the Skyward’s 50-denier AscentShell fabric isn’t as impervious to the elements as thicker Gore-Tex designs, but we experienced no issues throughout a winter of testing in the Pacific North-wet. If you do plan to venture out consistently in soggy conditions, a rigid hardshell pant (like the Sentinel above) will provide a more stalwart defense, although the lack of stretch isn’t ideal for active backcountry pursuits. It’s true that Outdoor Research offers a more versatile solution in their Hemispheres Bib below—patterning bombproof 3-layer Gore-Tex with panels of stretchy hardshell—but the added tech will cost you a whopping $599. In the end, we think the Skyward II strikes the best balance of performance and value for backcountry skiers, and this year it’s also available in an updated bib design called the Skytour AscentShell Bib.
See the Outdoor Research Skyward II
Best Women’s Ski Bib
Best for: Resort/backcountry
Type: Hardshell w/stretch
What we like: Bomber protection, great fit, and style points galore.
What we don’t: Less versatile than pants and not particularly lightweight for backcountry skiing.
There are a lot of reasons you might opt for a bib, including additional protection, expanded coverage, and more options for storage. Or maybe you just like the way they look, which is reason enough (look good, ski good—right?). Regardless of the why, bibs have gained popularity in recent years both at the resort and in the backcountry, and the Flylow Foxy is a runaway favorite among female shredders. Flylow nailed the design, which is remarkably sleek and clean yet fully featured with four thigh vents, a number of well-placed pockets, and a long, barn-door zipper for easy entry and when nature calls. And like the Skyward II above, the Foxy uses a stretchy hardshell fabric (3L Tactic) that lends added comfort and mobility alongside winter-ready protection.
Fit can be an issue with bibs, but most women will find a Foxy that works for them, with five sizes from XS to XL and options for tall, regular, and short lengths. A stretchy panel at the lower back also helps keep things snug and flattering while doubling as extra ventilation. That said, like any bib, the Foxy will run hotter than a comparable pant (like the Skyward II above), which is worth considering for mild weather and especially active pursuits. And for performance-driven days in the backcountry, it's a bit heavy at 1 pound 6.9 ounces. There are a lot of other high-quality bibs for women—including the lighter-weight SnowDrifter and ultra-protective Beta SV below—but the Foxy earns our top billing for its combination of style, fit, and performance.
See the Flylow Gear Foxy Bib
Best Slim-Fitting Pant for Resort Skiing
Best for: Resort
Insulated: No (polar fleece lining)
What we like: Stylish, generous coverage, and great stretch.
What we don’t: Not very weatherproof and no vents.
Throwing it back to the ‘80s, the Roxy Rising High are a resort pant built for women that put a high value on style. Using a stretchy softshell fabric, they’re form-fitting all the way from the high waist to the cuffs, where you can add a flare—or not—with the integrated zipper. On the inside, a polar fleece lining provides modest warmth, and Roxy’s DryFlight waterproof membrane does a decent job keeping moisture at bay. Paired with a classy ski jacket (like the Obermeyer Tuscany II), you’re sure to make a statement in the lift lines, cruising the corduroy, and even après.
Unfortunately, however, the Rising High are more style than substance. The plain-weave softshell fabric absorbs moisture far more readily than hardshell, and Roxy’s DryFlight is no match for a proven Gore-Tex membrane. What’s more, the pants are only taped at critical seams, which means there are more areas for water to soak through (especially bad news on slushy chairlifts). And you’ll need to find the temperature sweet spot: the snug build doesn’t allow for much more than a thin baselayer underneath, and the lack of vents will have you overheating on warm spring days. But the Rising High nevertheless are a nice match for bluebird days in places like Colorado or Utah, and the sophisticated styling is hard to beat.
See the Roxy Rising High
Best of the Rest
Best for: Resort
Type: Hardshell w/stretch
Insulated: Yes (60g Primaloft Black)
What we like: Insulation, a bit of stretch, and a clean design at a reasonable price.
What we don’t: Pants are prone to showing wear over time.
For a super clean resort pant with a nice dose of cold-weather warmth, give the Legendary Pant from Helly Hansen a look. The 2-layer waterproof shell is perfect for those who aren’t frequently working up a sweat, and 60-gram Primaloft Black insulation will be a savior for frigid rides on the chairlift (especially when paired with a quality baselayer). We also like the simple design from the Norwegian company, which comes in a variety of attractive colorways and should pair well with just about any jacket.
In terms of mobility, the Legendary incorporates a mechanical stretch fabric not wholly unlike the Skyward II above. The extra “give” is great for both sidecountry hikes and downhill travel and offers a bump in performance compared to the budget The North Face Freedom above. Our main complaint has to do with durability: the build quality isn’t quite up to par with Patagonia or Arc’teryx, and the pants will show more wear over time. But compared to the $379 Powder Bowl above, the Legendary offers similar warmth for close to half the price, which is very enticing for casual riders and those who only hit the slopes a few weekends a season.
See the Helly Hansen Legendary Insulated
Best for: Backcountry/resort
Type: Hardshell w/stretch & softshell
What we like: Creative mix of weather protection and comfort.
What we don’t: The Skyward II above is a little better for touring.
Patagonia’s backcountry pant and jacket collection has gone through a number of major revamps over the past few years, but they’ve landed on a real winner with the SnowDrifter Bib. The design essentially has two parts: a stretchy 3-layer waterproof hardshell protects you below the waist, while a supple softshell covers the upper body. This provides a nice balance of weather resistance (the upper portion isn’t waterproof but does have a DWR coating) and range of motion for steep uphill sections and extended bootpacks. Along with creative two-way zippers at the back that double as a drop seat and large venting system, the SnowDrifter is a formidable season-long option.
How does the SnowDrifter Bib compare with the OR Skyward II above? Beyond the obvious added protection around the torso, the SnowDrifter’s waterproof lower uses a burlier 75-denier fabric (the Skyward’s is 50D), which helps with both windproofing and tear resistance. This makes the Patagonia a bit more appealing for resort days, although the tradeoff is less breathability and stretchiness around the legs. All things considered, we give the edge to the better-venting and more mobile Skyward II for touring, but the SnowDrifter is a great all-rounder for those who prefer to wear bibs.
See the Patagonia SnowDrifter Bib
Best for: Resort/backcountry
What we like: A bomber pant with great ventilation.
What we don’t: Proprietary waterproofing isn’t as premium as Gore-Tex.
Flylow Gear flies a little under the radar compared to some of the bigger outdoor gear companies, but the Nina pants are another very solid offering from the Colorado-based brand. Like the Foxy Bib above, this is a super tough design with a 3-layer build, Cordura cuff patches, and waterproof zippers. But unlike the stretchy Foxy, the Nina is a standard hardshell, giving you even more assurance against fowl weather. The pants breathe well considering the impressive level of protection, and you can release hot air in four places: two zippered vents along the inner thigh and two large vents along the outside of your legs. It all adds up to a solid ski pant for both front and backcountry use, and the relaxed fit and Velcro waist adjustment should make most women happy (note: you might need to size up).
How does the Flylow stand up against the competition? It's not cheap but still comes in significantly less than our top-ranked Sentinel AR. And while Flylow's proprietary membrane is no match for Gore-Tex, the Nina's design does beat out the Arc’teryx in terms of ventilation, with no fleece lining and zippered openings on both sides of the legs. Style is another consideration: the Nina is a bit baggier than the Sentinel, which can be fun for resort days but slightly cumbersome on the skin track. But the Nina nevertheless is a premium 3-layer option that'll fly both in and out of bounds, and it has a cult-like following to back it up. For an insulated model from Flylow Gear, check out their Daisy Pant, which features 40-gram fill and is offered in a larger range of sizes, including both short and tall versions.
See the Flylow Gear Nina
Best for: Resort
Insulated: Yes (40g Thermore Classic)
What we like: Great fit and available in a ton of sizes.
What we don’t: Fairly unimpressive waterproofing.
Based in Aspen, Colorado, Obermeyer has been designing ski wear since 1947—which means they’ve seen the sport through a heckuva lot of fashion trends. But as resort style has moved from one pieces to snow bunnies to baggy, snowboard-inspired garb, Obermeyer has stuck close to their original formula with sophisticated yet functional offerings. The Malta here is their most popular women’s pant, with a trim fit, 40-gram insulation, and a non-stretchy hardshell face fabric. To be sure, weather protection doesn’t measure up to Gore-Tex (or comparable) models, but the Obermeyer will get the job done for casual resort use in mostly dry conditions.
What women love most about the Malta is the flattering fit: the high-rise waist offers great coverage when bending over to adjust your boots, and the rest of the design is contoured to fit snugly without inhibiting range of motion. Further, while the insulation provides decent levels of warmth, it’s inconspicuous enough to keep bulk low. And to help dial things in, the Malta comes in 12 sizes from 0 to 22, including short and long lengths. In many ways, it's a great hardshell alternative to the Roxy Rising High above. You do get what you pay for—the Malta is only critically seam taped, which means middling protection on wet days—but it’s still an improvement from the Roxy for $50 less. And if you’re looking for an even more classic option from Obermeyer, check out their softshell Bond pant—and get your faux fur hat ready too.
See the Obermeyer Malta
Best for: Backcountry/resort
What we like: Fantastic quality, weather protection, and breathability.
What we don’t: Pricey for having an in-house membrane; runs warm in the torso.
Still a young brand, Trew Gear has really broken through in the ski and snowboard markets thanks to their high-quality and clean-looking outerwear designs. The Chariot Bib here is one of their best all-rounders: the proprietary 3-layer PNW construction is reminiscent of premium Gore-Tex in both look and feel, and you get full seam taping with reinforcements, smooth-operating water-resistant zippers, and bomber coverage that keeps even the wettest of snow at bay. Tack on a drop-seat design for easy bathroom breaks and generous inner thigh vents, and the Chariot is the full package for both resort and backcountry skiers.
How does the Chariot stack up to the legendary Flylow Foxy above? Both designs offer fantastic coverage for deep conditions, and their 3-layer builds and feature sets make them viable options for 50/50 resort and backcountry use. At $420, the Flylow gets the slight edge in price, and we also prefer its bib organization: the Chariot has two smaller pockets at the torso, while the Foxy’s extra-large kangaroo pocket is functional and fun. Further, the Trew Gear lacks the extra ventilation and snug fit you get from the Flylow Gear’s stretchy panel at the lower back. But the Chariot is nevertheless a very popular choice, and it comes in six colorways, sizes from XS to XXL, and three inseam lengths. For a step down in price, check out Trew's Astoria bibs, which were designed in collaboration with Evo and feature a more affordable 2-layer construction.
See the Trew Gear Chariot Bib
Best for: Resort
Insulated: Yes (60g Microtemp XF)
What we like: Affordable and tough for occasional resort use.
What we don’t: Not fully waterproof and pretty cheap and bulky materials overall.
Columbia’s Bugaboo Pant has been a long-time favorite among beginner skiers. The price is right at $110, which includes a durable and hardwearing exterior, waterproof lining, and a healthy dose of warmth with 60-gram synthetic insulation. In addition, Columbia incorporates a surprising number of useful features: the adjustable waistband makes it quick and easy to customize the fit (it secures with Velcro), and the hand pockets are nicely sized for storing essentials like a lift pass and keys. Totaled up, the Bugaboo IV is everything a first-timer or occasional skier needs and nothing they don’t.
The Columbia gives The North Face’s Freedom above a run as our favorite budget ski pant but comes up short in a few key areas. First, the Bugaboo is less weather-worthy and can succumb to extended moisture more readily. This likely only will be an issue on especially wet snow days, but it’s something to keep in mind should you frequent areas prone to those conditions. Further, you miss out on zippered vents for dumping heat, mobility is impacted by the bulky design, and the material quality is a step down and likely won’t hold up as well in the long run as the Freedom. That said, for $59 less and with a similar feature set, it’s hard to knock the Bugaboo’s overall value.
See the Columbia Bugaboo IV
Best for: Resort
What we like: Unparalleled coverage and fun styling.
What we don’t: Expensive and one pieces lack versatility.
Arc’teryx threw out their design blueprints and started from scratch with the Incendia One Piece. This is a marvel of a design created by women and for women, with a fit and styling that are second to none and the premium build quality that Arc’teryx and very few other companies offer. We love the one-piece style for its fashion-forward looks and bombproof coverage (and many women back up our praise), but the Incendia also comes in a bib version for those who prefer more versatility. No matter which variation you opt for, this Arc’teryx design is the cream of the crop and should last you for many seasons to come.
The Incendia is built with a robust, 100-denier face fabric and 3-layer Gore-Tex with a tricot backer. As a result, it’s a lot thicker and more rigid than a pant like the Skyward II above, which uses unlined 50-denier fabric. But the heathered interior offers a soft and supple feel, and the good news is that the Incendia is capable of withstanding a serious squall and handling all sorts of wear and tear. That said, before opting for the One Piece, it’s worth considering the downsides to the design, including limited versatility for backcountry use and tedious bathroom breaks (the Incendia does include a quick-release at the thighs, which is a nice touch). But ski suits have been on the slopes for as long as folks have been surfing pow on two planks, and the Incendia is one of the most modern and high-performance offerings yet.
See the Arc'teryx Incendia One Piece
Best for: Backcountry/resort
Type: Hardshell w/stretch
What we like: Fully waterproof, stretchy, and highly comfortable.
What we don’t: Pricey and not the sleekest bib design.
Outdoor Research's Hemispheres Bib and Jacket kit received a lot of attention at its release in late 2018, and for good reason. The Bib features bombproof 3-layer Gore-Tex patterned with 2-layer Gore-Tex with Stretch Technology, which is truly a best-of-both-worlds combination. You can find other 3-layer Gore-Tex designs (like the Sentinel AR), and there's no shortage of stretch-infused hardshells (like the Skyward and SnowDrifter), but no other pant or bib on this list offers such a functional combination of the two. Through a full season of backcountry and resort skiing, we can confidently say that the Hemispheres is the real deal. Simply put, it’s the most comfortable bib we’ve tested without any noticeable compromise in weather protection. The generous stretch is a big plus on the skin track, and its seam-sealed construction has withstood everything from wet snow and rainfall to deep powder days.
What pushes the Hemispheres Bib down our list is its steep price tag. At $599, it’s more expensive than the Arc’teryx Beta SV below, which features an even more bombproof Gore-Tex Pro build. What’s more, fit and finish aren't perfect: some women might find the bib to be roomier in the chest than most, and it just doesn’t measure up to the sleek look of designs like the Patagonia SnowDrifter and Flylow Foxy above. And from within OR’s lineup, we think the 3-layer Carbide Bib is a stellar value at just $299. These nitpicks aside, if you want maximum range of motion without any major concessions in weather protection, the Hemispheres deserves a serious look.
See the Outdoor Research Hemispheres Bib
Best for: Resort
Type: Hardshell w/stretch
Insulated: Yes (40g Primaloft Black Eco)
What we like: Upgraded features and a more tailored cut than TNF Freedom.
What we don’t: Lackluster finishes and budget waterproof membrane.
The sub-$200 price range is chock-full of ski pant options, but the Marmot Slopestar makes its case with a nice fit and modest upgrades from many budget models. To start, you get a stretch-infused hardshell face fabric with 2-layer waterproofing (a step up from a softshell design like the Roxy Rising High above), along with premium Primaloft Black Eco insulation (40g). Articulated knees and slight contouring result in& a more tailored fit than The North Face Freedom or Patagonia Powder Bowl, and we’ve found that the outer-thigh vents dump heat slightly better than those placed on the inner thigh (such as the TNF’s). Available in a wide range of colors, the Slopestar checks a lot of boxes for season-long resort use.
Why does the Slopestar fall toward the bottom of our rankings? Most notably, Marmot’s MemBrain fabric lags behind the more premium offerings here, with noticeably more bulk and diminished waterproofing and breathability. Second, the pants lack refined finishes like waterproof zippers and a RECCO reflector, although you can bump up to the similar Refuge ($200) for the extra bit of tech. But we’ve found the Slopestar’s fit and styling to be a nice middle ground between baggy and fitted pants, and they’re a fully serviceable option if you don’t plan to be out in the harshest conditions.
See the Marmot Slopestar
Best for: Resort/backcountry
Type: Hardshell w/stretch
Insulated: Yes (40g Primaloft Gold)
What we like: Nice balance of warmth and breathability.
What we don’t: Steep price; not as bombproof as a standard hardshell pant.
Colorado-based Strafe Outerwear has a strong following among the backcountry ski crowd. The Belle is their premium women’s pant, combining a proprietary 3-layer Recon Elite waterproof membrane with a stretchy and air-permeable face fabric and generous dose (40g) of Primaloft Gold insulation. Hinting at Strafe’s attention to detail, strategically placed hamstring vents effectively dump heat without letting in stray snowflakes. It's true that the Belle doesn’t block out wet snow and frigid wind quite as well as a standard Gore-Tex hardshell, but it insulates in the cold and still breathes well when the mercury rises. All told, it's a highly versatile option for cold-weather backcountry days and season-long resort use in all but the warmest of conditions.
But it’s not all function here. True to its name, the Belle is a beautifully designed pant, with thoughtful touches like a trim, tailored fit, multi-colored hook belt, and fleece-lined waistband. Strafe is a small company focused on quality and performance (we’ve been impressed with everything we’ve tested from them), but there’s no denying that their gear is spendy. At $519, the Belle is a significant investment even compared to premium insulated pants like the Powder Bowl above, and backcountry skiers on a budget might be better off pairing the Skyward II ($299) with a warm baselayer. But if you're willing to splurge, the Belle is a do-everything design that checks all the boxes better than most.
See the Strafe Belle
Best for: Backcountry
Type: Softshell & hardshell
What we like: A souped-up softshell pant for backcountry enthusiasts.
What we don’t: Not enough waterproofing for wet days.
Outdoor Research’s Skyward II above offers stretchy hardshell protection for backcountry skiers, but the Trailbreaker II takes uphill performance to the next level. This pant is business at the bottom and comfort on top, with supple softshell fabric around the waist and thighs and a burly 3-layer hardshell from the knees down. The result is waterproof protection where you need it and a stretchy and breathable pant everywhere else, which is great news for heated sessions on the skin track. And with thigh vents, four pockets, zip cuffs for easy on and off, and a waistband that folds up for additional coverage, the Trailbreaker sets itself apart from generic softshell designs as a fully featured ski pant.
Of course, there are a number of tradeoffs to keep in mind when opting for such a trimmed-down pant. First off, the lack of waterproofing across the rear limits your ability to take trailside breaks or lounge in a backcountry snow kitchen (it also might impact comfort on a frozen chairlift). And with no coverage across the thighs, we don’t recommend these pants for particularly wet days out. Second, the fairly snug fit doesn’t allow room for much more than a thin baselayer underneath, which means you’ll need to stay moving in frigid temps. And finally, the Trailbreaker’s fit and finish isn’t perfect: the gaiter cuffs are a touch too small to fit over some ski boots, and we wish the zipper pulls and snaps were easier to operate with gloves on. But for softshell lovers who want a little extra protection, it’s a purpose-built option and a great value at $225.
See the Outdoor Research Trailbreaker II
Best for: Backcountry
What we like: Bombproof protection in a lightweight, alpine-ready build.
What we don’t: Rigid fabrics, limited feature set, and fit issues.
For bombproof protection in a lightweight package, look no further than the Beta SV Bib. Arc’teryx offers a step up in waterproofing from any of the models above, with premium Gore-Tex Pro fabric (recently upgraded to the extra-durable Most Rugged construction) that extends above the waist for functional coverage without too much bulk. And while the Beta SV keeps weight low at just 1 pound 5.9 ounces, you still get full leg zips (great for getting your pants on over ski boots or crampons), reinforced patches at the instep, and a drop seat for when nature calls. It all adds up to a no-frills yet incredibly practical design and one of the only pants here that we recommend for serious ski expeditions.
What pushes the Arc'teryx down our list is that it’s more of an all-rounder intended for various activities (including mountaineering), so it’s a little short on ski-specific features. For one, you only get two tiny pockets on the bib, which isn’t great for organizing items like an avalanche beacon, map, keys, or gloves. Further, the fit can be hit or miss—many women find the Beta SV forms a gap in the back—and the stiff 80-denier fabric and 140-denier reinforcements lack the stretchiness of the designs above. The flipside is that the Beta SV easily outperforms its competitors in truly nasty conditions without weighing you down. In the end, if you’re planning on going out for extended missions deep in the backcountry, the proven SV bib is a great tool for the job (or opt for the Arc’teryx Beta AR, which offers similar performance without the bib).
See the Arc'teryx Beta SV Bib
Best for: Resort
Insulated: Yes (40g polyester)
What we like: Great value; design includes thigh vents.
What we don’t: Will not hold up well to sustained moisture.
REI’s in-house outerwear continues to impress us when it comes to bang for your buck, and their Powderbound ski kit is no exception. Overall, we think they’ve put together a solid product with the insulated pant: the 2-layer Peak waterproofing holds up to most winter weather (just don’t try your luck in super wet conditions), and a moderate level of insulation (40g) will keep you happy on the lift. Tack on all the requisite ski-specific features—inner thigh vents, boot gaiters and scuff guards, Velcro waist adjustments, and a nice assortment of fleece-lined pockets—and the Powderbound is primed for your next trip to the slopes.
Like the Columbia Bugaboo above, the Powderbound is critically seam sealed, which keeps costs low but isn’t great for staying dry in sustained snowfall. But while the Bugaboo forgoes all vents, the Powderbound features zip openings on the inner thighs (for a $30 bump in price). Along with the thinner insulation, these make it a better option than the Bugaboo for mild climates or those who overheat easily. Neither can dethrone The North Face’s Freedom as our budget pick, which is far more proven and worth the extra $30. But for a casual resort pant that also gets the job done for general snow use, the Powderbound is an affordable pick from a trusted brand.
See the REI Co-op Powderbound Insulated
|Arc'teryx Sentinel AR||$549||Resort/backcountry||Hardshell||No (fleece)||3-layer||1 lb. 2.3 oz.|
|Patagonia Powder Bowl||$379||Resort||Hardshell||Yes||2-layer||1 lb. 8.4 oz.|
|The North Face Freedom||$169||Resort||Hardshell||Yes||2-layer||1 lb. 8 oz.|
|Outdoor Research Skyward||$299||Backcountry||Hardshell w/stretch||No||3-layer||1 lb. 4.7 oz.|
|Flylow Gear Foxy Bib||$420||Resort/backcountry||Hardshell w/stretch||No||3-layer||1 lb. 6.9 oz.|
|Roxy Rising High||$200||Resort||Softshell||No (fleece)||2-layer||Unavailable|
|Helly Hansen Legendary||$200||Resort||Hardshell w/stretch||Yes||2-layer||1 lb. 2.3 oz.|
|Patagonia SnowDrifter Bib||$349||Backcountry/resort||Hardshell w/stretch||No||3-layer||1 lb. 2.2 oz.|
|Flylow Gear Nina||$360||Resort/backcountry||Hardshell||No||3-layer||1 lb. 7 oz.|
|Trew Gear Chariot Bib||$439||Backcountry/resort||Hardshell||No||3-layer||1 lb. 11 oz.|
|Columbia Bugaboo IV||$110||Resort||Hardshell||Yes||2-layer||Unavailable|
|Arc'teryx Incendia||$999||Resort||Hardshell||No||3-layer||1 lb. 15.3 oz.|
|OR Hemispheres Bib||$599||Backcountry/resort||Hardshell w/stretch||No||3-layer||1 lb. 4.1 oz.|
|Marmot Slopestar||$175||Resort||Hardshell w/stretch||Yes||2-layer||1 lb. 7.4 oz.|
|Strafe Belle||$519||Resort/backcountry||Hardshell w/stretch||Yes||3-layer||1 lb. 4.5 oz.|
|OR Trailbreaker II||$225||Backcountry||Softshell & hardshell||No||3-layer||1 lb. 7.6 oz.|
|Arc'teryx Beta SV Bib||$575||Backcountry||Hardshell||No||3-layer||1 lb. 5.9 oz.|
|REI Co-op Powderbound||$139||Resort||Hardshell||Yes||2-layer||1 lb. 6.4 oz.|
- Best Uses: Resort and Backcountry
- Fabric Types
- Insulation and Warmth
- Fabric Layers: 3L vs. 2L
- Ski Pants vs. Bibs
- Ski Pant Features
- Fit and Sizing
- Layering Underneath Your Ski Pants
- Ski Jacket and Pant Sets
Most ski pants are designed with a specific type of skiing in mind—either resort, backcountry, or both. To help guide your decision, we’ve included a “best for” specification in our product descriptions and table above. Starting with inbounds-focused models, these pants are built tough: you typically get strong face fabrics, waterproof and windproof constructions, and generous fits for layering. If you ski consistently in frigid temperatures, it may be worth considering an insulated design, although we sometimes prefer the versatility of a non-insulated shell for season-long use.
Those traveling uphill on the skin track or bootpack will have an entirely different set of needs. First off, mobility and freedom of movement are very important for backcountry use, so you’ll often find some form of built-in stretch and an athletic fit so you can high step without extra fabric getting in the way. Additionally, breathability is essential—the materials are thinner, and large zippered side vents (sometimes on both the inside and outside of the legs) are crucial for staying cool. Finally, all-out weather protection can sometimes be compromised in the quest to keep you from overheating, including panels of breathable softshell or thin and stretchy hardshell (whether or not this is a good idea for you will depend on your local weather and snow conditions).
As you’ll see above, many pants toe the line for both resort and backcountry use. Generally, these are premium, uninsulated models that use high-end technology like 3-layer Gore-Tex to strike a nice balance between protection and breathability. These pants aren’t cheap—the Arc'teryx Sentinel AR ($549) and Outdoor Research Hemispheres Bib ($599) are two of our favorites—but for those who get out a lot both in and out of bounds, the versatility is well worth the investment.
In general, modern ski pants are built with one of three types of shell fabric: hardshell, hardshell with mechanical stretch, or softshell. The type of fabric you opt for will depend on where you're skiing (we favor hardshells for resort use) and how much mobility you need (stretchy designs are great for mogul skiers and uphill enthusiasts). Most skiers will opt for a pant that uses hardshell or hardshell with integrated stretch, but we've also included a few softshell models on our list above.
For most resort uses, we prefer the traditional hardshell. Hardshells provide a reliable barrier against wet snow and harsh winds (great for long chairlift rides), and pricier options can have impressively long lifespans. Due to their stalwart construction, hardshells aren't particularly breathable (although 3-layer designs usually beat out 2-layer), and you'll have to put up with their more rigid feel. But resort skiers generally don’t need a particularly breathable or supple pant, and the good news is that most hardshells here have side vents to dump heat on warmer days. Our top-rated Arc’teryx Sentinel AR is a standout example, with bombproof 3-layer Gore-Tex protection, a thick 70-denier face fabric, and long side vents.
Hardshell with Stretch
Hard-charging resort skiers, sidecountry fanatics, and backcountry skiers will want a waterproof pant, but some amount of stretch is a nice touch. Designs like the Patagonia SnowDrifter Bib and Outdoor Research Skyward II feature a hardshell construction with built-in stretch, which is a lot more supple than a standard hardshell—you don’t get that rigid and crinkly feel—and places a premium on freedom of movement and breathability. However, you do compromise a bit in the way of all-out protection: stretchy fabrics allow more air to flow than a hardshell, so they feel less impervious in strong gusts. Additionally, they’re more prone to wetting out after extended exposure. But it doesn’t get much better for most backcountry skiers, and it’s for good reason that we see more stretch-infused hardshell pants on the shelves each year.
On the far end of the spectrum are pants that feature full-on softshell constructions, such as the Outdoor Research Trailbreaker II and Roxy Rising High. Softshell fabrics are stretchy, air-permeable, and soft against the skin, which makes them great for high-output pursuits or (in the case of the Roxy) those who prize stylish, form-fitting designs. On the flipside, softshells absorb moisture much more readily than hardshells, which can cause them to grow heavy and less breathable (not to mention, some softshell designs do not come with a waterproof membrane). As a result, a softshell pant will fall short in wet weather, but they're still an intriguing choice for a lot of reasons. And designs like the Trailbreaker offer a nice mix of hardshell and softshell fabrics for ample weather protection, but we still don't recommend them for particularly soggy days out or resort use.
In terms of warmth, ski pants fall into two general categories: uninsulated shells and models with built-in synthetic fill. Resort skiers, and especially those that stick to groomed runs, will be best off with an insulated model. The boost in warmth is useful to fend off the chill, and the thicker construction provides an additional barrier between you and a frigid chairlift seat (or when sitting on snow). The vast majority of insulated ski pants use synthetic fill due to its affordability and that it continues to insulate even when wet (unlike goose or duck down). The amount of warmth offered doesn’t vary too widely, and most use somewhere between 40- and 80-gram fill. The ideal amount for you will depend on your local conditions, skiing style (aggressive or casual), and if you’re prone to running hot or cold. Opting for a pant with 60-gram synthetic is a safe bet, and a design like The North Face's Freedom is often the sweet spot for many skiers.
That being said, an uninsulated pant makes a lot of sense for hard chargers or those that plan to ski the side- and backcountry. A shell pant won’t be as prone to overheating if you’re a mogul rider, spend a lot of time off-trail in soft snow, or if you do any extended hiking. And if you’ll be ski touring, a shell pant is a must-have to stay as cool as possible. A final benefit of foregoing insulation is that you can tune your baselayer depending on conditions: for spring-time or active use, you can opt for a lightweight model, and mid or heavyweight baselayers are great in the cold. Again, those planning on lapping the resort will most likely prefer the extra isolation and comfort of an insulated design, but there are a number of situations where a shell is the preferred option.
Most premium ski pants have a 3-layer construction, which incorporates three separate pieces of fabric: an outer shell, the actual waterproof and breathable membrane, and an inner lining. This makes it less bulky compared to a 2-layer design (these require a separate, hanging liner along the interior) and also improves breathability and next-to-skin comfort. 3-layer pants are more expensive than 2-layer models and often involve big names like Gore-Tex. As a result of their strengths, 3-layer pants are popular among serious downhill and backcountry skiers.
Many mid-range and budget ski pants have a 2-layer construction, in addition to most of the insulated models above. These are less breathable than 3-layer designs, although they often use thick fabrics that are quite durable. We’ve found that 2-layer pants are perfectly suitable for resort use where ventilation and mobility aren't as important, and they make a lot of sense for an insulated design (when an extra liner is required regardless). Further, you can save by going this route: for instance, the Columbia Bugaboo IV costs $110, while the cheapest 3-layer waterproof pant on this list is $299 (the Outdoor Research Skyward II).
Quality water resistance in a ski pant is an absolute must. They come in contact with snow on nearly every run (not to mention each lift ride) and really put the membrane and outer fabric to the test. For ultimate waterproof protection, look for a burly hardshell pant made with Gore-Tex. Mid-range and entry-level options often utilize manufacturers' in-house laminates (Patagonia’s H2No and OR’s AscentShell, for example) that are still fully waterproof but most likely won’t have as long of a lifespan. Seam taping and a durable water repellent (DWR) coating also are important for hard chargers to keep moisture from sneaking through. And keep in mind that some budget offerings only feature seam taping in critical areas, which results in compromised waterproofing. Like most things, spending a little more does get you a nice upgrade in quality and longevity.
Backcountry skiers have a different set of priorities, so they do not always require full waterproofing. Less time sitting on a chair and more time on the skin track means that some backcountry skiers only need waterproofing in specific areas or a very water-resistant construction (especially in regions known for dry snow like the Rocky Mountains). Your needs will vary, but don't automatically discount a partially waterproof or non-waterproof pant (like the OR Trailbreaker II) for backcountry use, especially in warmer spring conditions when you need the added breathability.
As we touched on above, breathability needs are closely aligned with your intended use(s). Resort riders—especially those that plan to stay on groomed runs—usually don’t require a light and airy design. Most standard 2-layer constructions will offer sufficient breathability, and you can always select one with zippered vents to dump a little excess heat as needed. However, if you venture into the sidecountry, plan to mix in some touring, or are a backcountry enthusiast, breathability becomes an important consideration. Among hardshell designs, lightweight 3-layer constructions are the best ventilators (including Arc’teryx’s Beta SV), and many stretchy hardshells or designs with panels of softshell fabric are even more impressive. You make compromises in all-out protection in harsh winds and wet snow, but air-permeable options like the Outdoor Research Skyward II or Trailbreaker II are great performers when working hard.
Ski pants see a lot of rough use—everything from ski boot buckles, metal edges, and chairlifts can wreak havoc on the materials. As a result, they’re a tough bunch overall. The most common way of determining ski pant durability is the fabric denier (D), which measures the thickness of the threads used for the shell material. Most resort-oriented designs are pretty substantial, including the Patagonia Powder Bowl (150D) and The North Face Freedom (140D x 160D). On the other end of the spectrum, touring-focused pants like the Outdoor Research Skyward II (50D) make the most compromises in durability to maximize comfort, mobility, and performance on the go. Our top-rated pant, the Arc’teryx Sentinel AR, does an excellent job of balancing needs for both activities with its high-quality 70D shell. Finally, it’s worth noting that many pants include a reinforced patch along the inside of the cuff (sometimes referred to as a scuff guard) for additional protection from ski edges.
Another “either or” decision when choosing ski pants is if you should opt for regular ski pants or a bib. Ski pants are the traditional choice and what most folks are familiar and comfortable with. They’re completely capable for resort or backcountry skiing and are much easier to slip on and off. The primary downside is felt when cold air or moisture finds its way up your back on the chairlift or after taking a fall.
Bibs are the remedy for these maladies as they offer better protection from the snow, wind, and wet. They also run a little warmer thanks to the extra layering that covers part of your upper body. While you don’t have to worry about any discomfort from a waistband, the straps that run over your shoulders can take some getting used to, and you’ll need to dial in the fit to keep them from moving around excessively or pulling the pant legs up too high.
On a related note, fit can be a challenge when it comes to women’s ski bibs. For this reason, we especially love the Flylow Gear Foxy, which comes in a range of sizes including short, regular, and tall lengths. A shorter bib like the Arc’teryx Beta SV is another great option—you get above-the-waist protection without too much extra bulk. And we’d be remiss not to mention Arc’teryx’s Incendia One Piece here, a beautifully crafted ski suit that offers full coverage alongside fun styling.
Typically, your jacket or ski backpack will be your primary place to store personal items, but it’s still worth checking the pocket situation on a pair of ski pants you’re eyeing. We recommend keeping it simple and looking for a couple of zippered pockets that can fit snacks or personal effects. Unless you really need the extra capacity, we’re not huge fans of cargo pockets for resort skiing—filling them with larger items feels ungainly on the mountain. Backcountry-specific pants like the Outdoor Research Skyward II put a greater emphasis on storage with dedicated pockets for items like an avalanche beacon and extras like a map or GPS device.
To aid in breathability, most ski pants boast a zippered ventilation system (essentially pit zips for your legs). The most common locations for the zippered panels are along the inside or outside of your thighs. We’ve found that outer-thigh vents do a better job dumping heat, while those on the inner thigh add unwanted bulk and can occasionally impact comfort (on the bright side, they are less conspicuous). Backcountry-specific pants often have the zippers on the outside of the legs in part for this reason, and a design like the Strafe Belle places them on the back of the hamstrings to keep fabric from puffing out at the sides. Finally, Flylow Gear's Foxy Bib and Nina pant have vents on both sides of the leg, which provides excellent cross ventilation.
Jacket-to-Pant Attachment Systems
Let’s face it: wipeouts happen, regardless of your skill level. And if you’ve had the pleasure of experiencing a tumble on the slopes, you know that snow is adept at finding its way into the crevices of your ski jacket or pants. To help prevent this, some manufacturers place a button or loop on the jacket’s powder skirt to connect it to a corresponding attachment on the pants, forming a solid seal from the wet and cold. It’s certainly not a required feature for either resort or backcountry use, but it's a nice addition for many. It’s worth noting that in nearly all cases, you’ll need to purchase a ski pant from the same brand for the system to work and integrate properly.
You may run into RECCO listed as a feature on some mid-range and high-end ski pants. These are for skiers that make their way out of bounds or into areas where they may experience avalanche dangers. The RECCO reflector is a passive unit that doesn’t require batteries and can be picked up by detectors often carried by resort search and rescue personnel. They lack the technology and strong signal of a dedicated avalanche beacon and should not be considered a substitute, but they do provide an additional safety measure for resort skiers that venture off-trail. For more information, RECCO's website provides a good breakdown of the tech.
Ski pant fit largely comes down to a matter of style and personal preference, but we can offer a few pointers for the uninitiated. Generally, most beginner and intermediate downhill skiers will opt for a comfortable fit that is neither too tight nor too baggy. Backcountry touring types lean towards a slimmer cut for less bulk (usually with built-in stretch to help with mobility). And then there’s the style component, which runs the gamut from classy, snug-fitting numbers like the Roxy Rising High to baggier designs inspired by street style. In the end, the most important thing is to find a pant that’s comfortable for you, and be sure to leave enough room for a light or midweight baselayer underneath (you’ll want this option even with the insulated styles).
To help you get a good fit, many women’s pants come in a range of sizes, including regular, short, and tall lengths. Designs like the Flylow Gear Foxy Bib, Obermeyer Malta, and REI Co-op Powderbound lead the charge here and are great picks for women who are particular about fit or have body shapes that fall outside the industry norm. Also look for Velcro waist adjustments and stretchy panels on bibs, which can help dial in a slightly loose pant and accommodate for varying layers as the season progresses.
The layers you wear under your ski pants don’t get as much attention as those warming your core, but they nevertheless remain an important consideration. To start, it’s almost always a good idea to throw on at least a thin pair of long underwear both for resort and backcountry skiing. The extra layer not only provides insulation and protection from cold snow and freezing chairlift seats, but it also wicks moisture away from your skin. Further, the interiors of ski pants (especially uninsulated designs) are often not very plush, with exposed mesh, zippers, and minimalist liners that become less comfortable as the day wears on.
In choosing a baselayer, it’s worth getting a soft and close-fitting design to maximize warmth. The best models are made with either synthetic or merino wool—cotton doesn’t insulate when wet, so it’s a bad idea even on a resort day. Synthetics are the cheaper option and efficiently wick moisture, but merino wool is our favorite. It’s very warm for its weight, cozy and soft, and naturally resists odor better than a polyester alternative. Baselayers are offered in a range of thicknesses, including lightweight designs for warm days or backcountry use, as well as mid- and heavyweight options for cold days at the resort. And in particularly frigid conditions, you can always double up your baselayers to increase warmth.
Matching your ski jacket and pants is by no means a requirement to looking good on the slopes, but manufacturers make it easy to do. The vast majority of the pants above have a jacket counterpart, and often under the same name. For example, the Arc'teryx Sentinel AR is available both as a jacket and a pant, in addition to the Patagonia Powder Bowl. In almost every case, the jacket features similar fabric and construction as the pant (for example, both the Sentinel AR jacket and pant are made with 3L Gore-Tex) and comes in a matching color.
Purchasing the complete set is fine, but penny pinchers in particular will find that they can save a lot by opting for a premium jacket and more budget-oriented pants. The reasoning is this: mid-range pants (like the Patagonia Snowbelle or Helly Hansen Legendary) lag behind premium models in two key ways—breathability and added bulk. And while we don't like to make compromises when it comes to the look and feel of our top layers, in most cases (particularly at the resort), the tradeoffs are less obvious in a pant. Plus, switching it up allows you to put together a fun, complimentary ski set, whereas most matching designs feature the same color for both the pant and the jacket. For a look at the best options of the season, check out our article on the best women's ski jackets.
Back to Our Top Women's Ski Pant Picks Back to Our Women's Ski Pant Comparison Table