Best Women's Hiking Shoes of 2025

Whether you’re setting out on a casual day hike or hitting the trail with overnight gear, there’s a hiking shoe up for the task. Compared to traditional hiking boots, hiking shoes are characterized by their low-top design, which translates to less weight on your feet for covering ground quickly. To compile our top picks, the female editors at Switchback Travel took to the trail, testing out everything from heavy-duty leather hikers to cushioned trail runners and approach shoes originally intended for climbing. Below are the best women's hiking shoes of 2025. For more background information, see our comparison table and buying advice below the picks, along with details about our testing process. And for a wider look at the market, check out our article on the best hiking shoes, which covers both men's and women's styles.

Editor's note: We updated this guide on April 18, 2025, to update the Hoka Speedgoat and Brooks Catamount to their newest versions, add the Adidas Terrex Free Hiker 2 Low into our lineup, and remove discontinued products from La Sportiva, The North Face, and Adidas. We also replaced the discontinued On Cloudwander with the new On Cloudrock, updated the guide throughout with recent notes from testing, and ensured all information was current at the time of publishing.
 

---

Our Team's Women's Hiking Shoe Picks

• Best Overall Hiking Shoe: Merrell Moab Speed 2
• Best Lightweight/Cushioned Hiking Shoe: Hoka Speedgoat 6 
• Best Budget Hiking Shoe: Merrell Moab 3
• Best Supportive Shoe for Backpacking: La Sportiva Spire GTX
• A Comfortable Shoe for Hard-to-Please Feet: Altra Lone Peak 9  

---

Best Overall Women's Hiking Shoe

1. Merrell Moab Speed 2 ($140)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 3.4 oz.
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: Extremely well rounded—this shoe checks all the right boxes for most hikers.
What we don’t: Roomy toe box and lack of secure heel detract from security and performance on technical terrain.

Merrell has long been a leader in hiking footwear, and the recently updated Moab Speed 2 takes the cake as our top women’s shoe this year. The original Moab Speed brought the much-loved Moab into the modern era, and the latest "2" carries the torch with a lightweight and cushioned build that will appeal to day hikers and weight-conscious backpackers alike. And despite its trail-runner-esque appearance, the Speed 2 still offers a healthy amount of protection and support—including a generous toe and heel cap and firm midsole—along with a capable Vibram outsole. Merrell also boosted comfort with the latest iteration by utilizing 30% more foam in the midsole, leading to a noticeably cushier and less rigid feel. The end result is a hardwearing yet comfortable hiking shoe that toes the line between weight-savings and on-trail performance better than most—and the price is right at just $140.

The Moab Speed 2 will get the job done for the majority of day hikers and ultralight backpackers, but it wouldn’t be our first choice for technical objectives that involve a lot of off-trail travel or scrambling. Our biggest gripes with the latest model were the wide toe box and lack of security at the heel, which resulted in a slightly sloppy feel. If you’re headed out on challenging terrain or with a heavy pack, models like the La Sportiva Spire below will offer more security and underfoot stability (at the cost of cushy comfort). On the other end of the spectrum, the Speed feels decidedly firmer and more planted than the Speedgoat below but lacks the Hoka’s snug and sock-like feel. In the end, it’s a tall order to recommend a single shoe for a range of hikers and venues, but the Moab Speed 2 nails the all-around equation better than most.
Read more: Merrell Moab Speed 2 GTX review
See the Merrell Moab Speed 2
 

Best Lightweight/Cushioned Hiking Shoe

2. Hoka Speedgoat 6 ($155)

Category: Trail runner
Weight: 1 lb. 0.4 oz.
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: A lightweight and well-cushioned shoe, great for moving quickly on the trail.
What we don’t: Tall stack height and soft midsole can result in instability.

Running brand Hoka is no stranger to trail-ready footwear, and their lightweight and cushioned designs have made a splash in the hiking market. Built as a trail runner, the Speedgoat 6 has been adopted by the thru-hiking community as a durable, capable shoe that can meet the demands of hikers and minimalist backpackers. In true Hoka style, the Speedgoat features a super thick midsole that isolates you nicely from uneven terrain, and you still get ample firmness for covering serious ground. Following suit, the outsole is impressively grippy and—although non-traditional—we found ourselves really appreciating the athletic and sprightly feel of the rockered sole. The Speedgoat 6 also drops just over a half-ounce from version 5, and in an unusual move, the cost didn't go up, which is nice to see.

If you’re thinking about going with a trail running shoe for hiking, there are some considerations to keep in mind, and the Speedgoat 6 has some updates we found to be a slight downgrade from the 5. In terms of trail performance, you get less protection from rocks and roots compared to a hiking shoe, and the flexible build translates to less stability on uneven ground (especially while carrying a load). Durability-wise, a soft shoe like the Speedgoat will pack out, abrade, and lose its cushion faster than a hiking-specific model. That said, it’s hard to argue with the myriad thru-hikers who routinely log 20-plus-mile days (with an overnight load) wearing this shoe. This most recent update added stability and durability with a firmer midsole and a more stretch-resistant knit upper, but we found last year's model to have a more plush feel and better breathability. Finally, the tongue on the 6 tends to bunch a bit under the top laces, which can be annoying during a long day on the trail. 
See the Hoka Speedgoat 6
 

Best Budget Hiking Shoe

3. Merrell Moab 3 ($120)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 9.1 oz.
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: A durable shoe for an affordable price.
What we don’t: Heavy and not built for technical terrain.

For those who prefer a more traditional hiking shoe, there’s a lot to love about the Moab 3. Merrell found a winning formula here, combining a comfortable fit with a sturdy yet lightweight feel—all for an affordable $120. The leather upper means you get a boost in protection and durability compared to synthetic designs like the Moab Speed above, and mesh panels offer better ventilation than an all-leather model like the La Sportiva TX4 Evo below. All in all, the Moab 3 is a hardwearing and time-tested solution for both day hikers and casual overnighters. 

While the Moab 3 checks all the boxes for moderate trails, the shoe is not meant for fast-paced or off-trail endeavors. On rocky and muddy trails, we’ve found that traction and stability fall short of grippier and closer-fitting designs like the Hoka Speedgoat above and Salomon X Ultra 5 GTX below. And despite clocking in well under 2 pounds, the Merrell is one of the heaviest shoes here and will feel clunky and cumbersome if you’re used to a more trail runner-inspired design. But for folks that don’t need cutting-edge performance, the Moab 3 is a wonderful hiking shoe with a long and reputable track record to back it up. Finally, Merrell also makes the Moab 3 Waterproof, which retails for $140 and checks in at a comparable 1 pound 10.1 ounces. 
Read more: Merrell Moab 3 review (men's version)
See the Merrell Moab 3
 

 

Best Supportive Shoe for Backpacking

4. La Sportiva Spire GTX ($209)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 10.2 oz.
Waterproof: Yes
What we like: Raised collar offers more ankle support than most shoes here.
What we don’t: Heavy and pricey.

We hesitate recommending many of the shoes here for much more than hiking on established trails, but the burly La Sportiva Spire GTX is a notable exception. The Spire is about as close to backpacking-ready as a hiking shoe gets—with a relatively high collar, La Sportiva goes so far as calling it a low-cut hiking boot. The heavily cushioned yet relatively stiff midsole offers a great balance of comfort, protection, and support, which comes in handy for high-mileage days and off-trail scrambling. Throw in excellent grip, good breathability (for a waterproof design), and the top-shelf quality we’ve come to expect from this Italian climbing brand, and you have one of the more capable hiking shoes on the market.

But the Spire isn’t for everyone: At $209, it’s the most expensive pick on this list by a long shot. Second, with a rather stiff and heavy build (1 lb. 10.2 oz. for the pair), it’s definitely more shoe than most day hikers need. For a nice middle ground, it’s worth considering La Sportiva’s lighter (1 lb. 2.4 oz.) Akasha II trail runner, which is noticeably softer and less supportive than the Spire but well equipped for moving quickly over technical terrain—ideal for hikers looking to retain agility without totally sacrificing protection. If you opt for the Spire, take note that it’s only offered in a waterproof version, which is great for early-season snow and colder weather but prone to overheating on summer days at low elevations. Most day hikers will want to look elsewhere, but for backpackers and those frequently traveling off trail or above treeline in areas like the High Sierra or Colorado Rockies, the Spire offers an excellent combination of support, durability, and protection.
Read more: La Sportiva Spire GTX review (men's version)
See the La Sportiva Spire GTX

 

A Comfortable Shoe for Hard-to-Please Feet

5. Altra Lone Peak 9 ($140)

Category: Trail runner 
Weight: 1 lb. 2.6 oz.
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: Flat and roomy footbed offers slipper-like comfort.
What we don’t: Can feel sluggish and imprecise on technical terrain; middling durability.

If you’re among the hikers who suffer from pressure points, hot spots, and blisters, this one’s for you. Popularized by the barefoot running movement, Altra’s zero-drop offerings are arguably the most ergonomic and comfortable on the trail, and their flagship Lone Peak has earned legendary status among the thru-hiking community. With a flat (zero drop) footbed and extra-roomy toe box, this shoe allows the foot to stay in its naturally prone and splayed position, which is great news for those with wide or particularly finicky feet. True to its trail-worthy intentions, the design also features a rock plate and gaiter attachments. We’ve recommended the Lone Peak to dozens of friends and acquaintances who’ve struck out with more traditional hiking shoes and have yet to lead anyone astray. 

Compared to past iterations of the Lone Peak, the 9 boasts a moderately more aggressive outsole and a “Ghillie” lacing system with optional pull-through points for a more customizable fit. Altra also simplified the upper even further from the 8’s already streamlined design, with no-sew overlays to reduce peeling and increased durability in the ripstop mesh. We’re looking forward to seeing how these perform in the durability realm, as that has been a specific complaint over the past few years with these shoes. In the past we've experienced extreme dulling of the outsole tread after just a few hundred miles, and separation in the toe cap. And while these shoes are quite comfortable, we’ve also found the Lone Peak to be sluggish, under-cushioned (you get just 25mm of stack height compared to the Speedgoat’s 33mm in the heel), and lacking in arch support—but for some feet, it simply doesn’t get any better. The 9 is also offered in a 9+ model, which retails for $155 and features a more durable Vibram outsole. ≈
See the Altra Lone Peak 9

 

More of the Best Women's Hiking Shoes

6. Salomon X Ultra 5 GTX ($170)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 6.6 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (non-GTX available)
What we like: Stable and durable without feeling too heavy.
What we don’t: Strange fit and odd underfoot feel; a little narrow out of the box.

Salomon’s X Ultra has been one of our favorite hiking shoes for years, offering an exceptional combination of comfort, on-trail performance, and durability for everything from casual day hikes to long overnight missions. This most recent update dropped 3 ounces from the pair weight (from 1 lb. 9.6 oz. to 1 lb. 6.6 oz.) and retained the outgoing 4's revised lacing system, more stable chassis, and wider fit in the toe box—though the price went up by $10. Overall, the X Ultra 5 is an ongoing favorite thanks to its fantastic mix of agility, durability, and protection, and there’s enough cushioning underfoot for full days with a loaded pack. 

The X Ultra held our top spot for years, but we were forced to reconsider after thoroughly testing the outgoing 4. In short, we weren't fans of the 4's fit, which featured a narrow midfoot along with a very spacious forefoot. The 5 still has a fairly narrow midfoot, but the toe box feels better aligned with the overall fit of the shoe. Some testers appreciate this locked-down feel through the midfoot, but we did notice some tightness on the sides before breaking in. Further, we found the last model to have an odd combination of stiffness in the heel and flexibility in the midfoot, which can result in sore feet. We are in the middle of putting the 5 to the test and will update this listing once we get more miles in the recent version, but we do recommend trying this shoe on before purchasing. 
Read more: Salomon X Ultra 4 GTX review (prior version)
See the Salomon X Ultra 5 GTX

 

7. Danner Trail 2650 ($170)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 2.0 oz.
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: Light and nimble without sacrificing protection or traction; high on style points. 
What we don’t: Expensive, ungainly heel counter, and not the most stable shoe here.

Danner originally was known for its work boots, but the longtime footwear brand has made a nice transition to hikers in the past few years. And the running shoe-inspired Trail 2650 is clear about its intentions: With the mileage of the Pacific Crest Trail in its name, this shoe is designed to tackle some serious ground. The Trail 2650 is comfortable right out of the box, grippy with a Vibram outsole, and competitively light (especially for a partial-leather design) at 1 pound 2 ounces per pair. Finally, it manages to do what most hiking shoes don’t: look good in the process. All in all, we’re impressed with the direction that Danner is headed, and the Trail 2650 lineup has received rave reviews (from us included) since its release several years ago.

The version of the Trail 2650 included here isn’t waterproof, but Danner also makes a GTX model for $190 and 1 pound 5 ounces per pair, along with a Mid GTX ($200) for those who want more ankle protection. It’s also worth noting the Danner Trail 2650 Campo—our favorite design for hot-weather hiking—which tones down the rubber heel counter (one of our nitpicks with the standard model), adds a lightweight mesh liner and sock-like construction, and knocks $10 off the price. Don’t expect a high level of stability from any of the shoes in the Trail 2650 series—we hesitate to wear them with a heavy pack—but for day hiking and ultralight backpacking, they’re solid all-rounders that are built to last.
Read more: Danner Trail 2650 review (men's version)
See the Danner Trail 2650

 

8. Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX ($180)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 8.8 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (non-GTX available)
What we like: Extremely comfortable; great lacing system and fit; smooth ride.
What we don’t: Some outsole durability issues and polarizing looks.

The Hoka Speedgoat above has achieved legendary status among hikers (specifically the thru-hiking community), but there are some notable trade-offs with the trail-running design. For those who want a bit more support and protection, Hoka also offers an impressive lineup of hiking-specific footwear, including the Anacapa 2 Low here. The Anacapa (also available in a mid-height version) features Hoka’s well-known springy midsole, a rockered shape for a smooth ride on the trail, and a beefed-up construction that includes durable nubuck leather and a Gore-Tex waterproof liner. The result is a fast-moving shoe that nicely mixes a trail runner-like feel with the added structure of a hiker.

The Anacapa was recently updated with a focus on more sustainable materials, along with a few noteworthy changes to the midsole and upper. With a less intrusive heel counter, additional tongue padding, and slightly softer midsole, the 2 is arguably more comfortable than the outgoing version, and Hoka also enhanced the toe box for more durability and protection. However, we were surprised to see that the Vibram Megagrip outsole remains virtually unchanged—like the original, it features large sections of blown rubber that are susceptible to damage from rocky trail use. But the Anacapa 2 is nevertheless a solid update to a very good hiking shoe, and it’s especially ideal for those who stick to established trails and prioritize cushy comfort. For a more breathable design for summer hiking, check out the non-waterproof Anacapa Breeze Low for $155.
Read more: Anacapa 2 Low GTX review (men's version)
See the Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX

 

9. Topo Athletic Traverse ($150)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 1.4 oz.
Waterproof: No 
What we like: All the benefits of a trail runner with added durability, support, and protection.
What we don’t: Noticeably stiffer than many other thru-hiker favorites; wide toe box and snug midfoot won’t work for all feet.

Topo Athletic might not be a household name like Salomon or Merrell, but their lineup of trail shoes speaks for itself—not to mention, they’re founded by the former CEO of Vibram. The Traverse is a newer shoe in Topo’s collection, designed specifically for the long-distance thru-hiking community. Durability and protection are two clear highlights of the design, including a tightly woven, abrasion-resistant mesh upper and rock plate to protect against harsh impacts underfoot. Along with a tacky and aggressive Vibram Megagrip outsole, the Traverse stands out as a notably more confidence-inspiring companion than the also-thru-hiker-friendly Speedgoat and Lone Peak above or Brooks Cascadia below when the going gets technical. Weight is competitive, too, with the Traverse checking in at the lighter end of the grouping.

Both Altra and Topo Athletic shoes have become popular among thru-hikers for their roomy toe boxes, which encourage natural toe splay and accommodate swelling during long stints on the trail. But while Altra’s zero-drop designs can feel a bit sloppy, especially on challenging ground, the Traverse offers a more high-performance feel with a snugger fit (particularly around the midfoot) and a 5-millimeter drop. It's also noticeably stiffer, which led to some foot soreness in testing. If plush comfort is a priority, Topo's Ultraventure 4 is a sizable step up and more responsive than the Lone Peak. A final nitpick is that the Traverse is only available in two drab colorways. But these complaints do little to detract from the shoes' light but planted feel on technical ground—great for long-distance hikers who want or need some added structure.
See the Topo Athletic Traverse

 

10. Adidas Terrex Free Hiker 2.0 Low Gore-Tex ($180)

Category: Hiking shoe 
Weight: 1 lb. 15.1 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (non-GTX available)
What we like: Excellent traction; noticeably protective and stable.
What we don’t: Heavy and stiff, not particularly plush, runs large.

While Adidas hasn't been in the hiking shoe game as long as some of the other brands here, we have been impressed with their Terrex collection over the past handful of years. The Free Hiker 2.0 Low provides truly impressive traction on technical terrain and the shoe's construction is notably well built, with a substantial outsole and a tightly woven upper that's reinforced in key places—it's even fared better than some leather designs we've tested. With a rigid structure that provides confidence-inspiring stability, the Free Hiker finds a great balance between a lightweight hiking shoe and a full-on boot. 

At 1 pound 15.1 ounces for a women's size 9 (the women’s 7 is listed at 1 lb. 11.8 oz.), the Free Hiker is on the heavy side for a hiking shoe, especially considering how offerings seem to get lighter every year. In fact, it outweighs many of the top lightweight hiking boot options, which will also provide more ankle support and water protection. The Free Hiker's weight, combined with the fact that it runs a bit large, make it feel clunky—it certainly doesn't feel as nimble as it looks like it would be. The build is also noticeably stiff and without the plushness of other offerings here. That said, while backpacking with the Free Hiker, we felt confident on all manner of terrain, even scree and snow, which could be priceless depending on your adventure style. All told, if you need something for easy trails with a light pack, the Free Hiker is overbuilt; but if you want extra support and protection for harder missions, this is a great contender. 
Read more: Adidas Terrex Free Hiker 2.0 Low review
See the Adidas Terrex Free Hiker 2.0 Low Gore-Tex

 

11. Salomon Elixir Activ GTX ($155)

Category: Hiking shoe 
Weight: 1 lb. 3.6 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (non-GTX available)
What we like: A true hiking shoe that's not too heavy or stiff for sections of running.
What we don’t: You give up some support and durability with the lightweight build.

Salomon’s X Ultra 5 above is a durable and protective hiking shoe, but weight-conscious and minimalist hikers who don’t mind sacrificing some support should check out their Elixir Activ. A relatively new addition to Salomon’s lineup, these highly cushioned kicks had our tester feeling like she was walking on a cloud. Underfoot protection is excellent thanks to the thick and plush midsole, and the rockered shape helps promote a smooth and responsive ride. While less aggressive than the X Ultra 5, we also had largely positive experiences with the Elixir’s outsole, which features multi-directional lugs that extend slightly past the front for maintaining grip on steep slopes. The cherry on top: The Elixir Activ checks in at just 1 pound 3.6 ounces per pair, which is a considerable 3 ounces lighter than the X Ultra and translates to a very sprightly feel—enough so that it’s easy to mix in some jogging on fastpacking adventures.

As is almost always the case with lightweight hiking footwear, the Elixir Activ GTX sacrifices some support and durability in order to keep weight low. There isn't a lot of lateral stability due to the flexible materials and very low collar, which means your ankle is tasked with doing most of the work (this is especially noticeable on technical and off-camber terrain). Plus, the thin materials are more susceptible to abrasion and snags over time, although our pair held up well to several day hikes on very overgrown trails in Chilean Patagonia. For a step up in durability, the standard Elixir GTX has a beefier build with a thicker toe cap and reinforcements along the upper, although weight jumps to 1 pound 7.7 ounces.
See the Salomon Elixir Activ GTX

 

12. Scarpa Rush 2 GTX ($199)

Category: Hiking shoe
Weight: 1 lb. 6.2 oz.
Waterproof: Yes 
What we like: Trail runner-like agility with a boost in protection and stability.
What we don’t: Expensive; not as light as trail runners like the Speedgoat and Lone Peak.

The hiking-shoe-meets-trail-runner love story has been unfolding for a number of years, and Scarpa’s Rush 2 GTX is a prime example. With the cushion and rocker of a trail runner alongside the stability and protection of a hiking shoe, the Rush is a best-of-both-worlds option for modern hikers. Specifically, you get a durable fabric upper with welded reinforcements, burly midsole with EVA foam and TPU reinforcements for cushion and stability, and a sticky, rockered outsole that facilitates quick movements. All told, if you’re considering a trail runner but are wary of giving up the support and hardwearing nature of a hiking shoe, the Rush 2 GTX (also offered in a mid-height version) is well worth a look.

We wore the first-generation Scarpa Rush while trekking in southern Patagonia and were impressed with its prowess on everything from hard-packed trail to talus and smooth rock. Our main gripe was the shoe’s low collar and poor ankle lock; thankfully, the 2 offers a noteworthy improvement with increased stability and torsion control at the rear. And while the Rush is significantly heavier than trail runners like the Speedgoat and Lone Peak above (read: not ideal for running), it does feel lighter than its weight would suggest (and in a side-by-side test, the original version was notably more cushioned than the Salomon X Ultra 5). Finally, the Scarpa is pricey at $199. But for speed-focused hikers and fastpackers, it’s hard to knock the purpose-built design, which offers a nice boost in stability and protection compared to standard trail running shoes.
See the Scarpa Rush 2 GTX

 

13. Brooks Cascadia 18 ($140)

Category: Trail runner
Weight: 1 lb. 3.8 oz.
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: A classic thru-hiking shoe that offers a bit more stability than the Speedgoat above.
What we don’t: Dated styling and not particularly plush.

Now in its 18th iteration, the Brooks Cascadia is one of the longest-standing trail runners on the market and particularly popular in the thru-hiking community. Like the Speedgoat and Lone Peak above, this shoe bridges the gap for speed-focused hikers with the support and protection you need for rugged trails alongside a hefty dose of cushioning for long days out. And at only 1 pound 3.8 ounces for the pair, it won’t weigh you down as much as the hiking-specific shoes on this list. We took the past-generation 17 (which is largely similar to the latest model) on a backpacking trip through Washington’s Necklace Valley and were impressed with its balanced design: The Cascadia felt stable and precise while traversing off-camber terrain but remained impressively quick and responsive when running the vehicle shuttle at the end of the trek.

How does the Cascadia compare with another darling of the thru-hiking world, the Altra Lone Peak? Both offer a nice array of trail-ready features like a rock plate and attachment points for gaiters, along with roomy toe boxes that are great for accommodating swollen toes. However, the Cascadia locks things down at the midfoot and heel for a more performance-oriented fit. And the key difference is the Cascadia’s 8-millimeter drop compared to the Lone Peak's zero-drop shape, which lends a more agile and quick overall feel. In the end, we think the Cascadia is the best all-rounder for most hikers, although the Lone Peak is lighter and likely the better match for those with finicky feet. And for a step up in responsiveness, check out Brooks' own Catamount below.
See the Brooks Cascadia 18

 

14. Salomon XA Pro 3D V9 GTX ($160)

Category: Hiking shoe/trail runner
Weight: 1 lb. 6.2 oz.
Waterproof: Yes (non-GTX available)
What we like: Lighter and more cushioned than the X Ultra—overall a better fit for easy trails.
What we don’t: Outdated feel; lacks the protection and stability most will want on technical terrain.

Salomon bills its XA Pro 3D as a trail running shoe, but we've found it better suited for day hikes and overnights on easy-to-moderate terrain. Now in its ninth iteration, the XA Pro 3D features a well-padded tongue and collar, and the Quicklace system creates a snug and secure hold around the foot. Despite its running focus, protection is also surprisingly good thanks to a burly toe cap, rigid heel cup, and solid 3D Advanced chassis. The GTX version here features a reliable waterproof membrane that will keep most moisture at bay (it's also sold without Gore-Tex for $140). Added up, you get the comfort and weight of a running shoe with the traction, durability, and protection of a hiker—a competitive combination for hikers and backpackers carrying loads of around 35 pounds or less.

Compared to the X Ultra 5 above, the XA Pro is a bit more cushioned and not quite as stiff underfoot, making it a better fit for smooth trails but less stable on technical terrain or when shuttling a heavier pack. We also found that it feels a little outdated and unpolished along the interior, which is especially noticeable when worn back-to-back with more modern designs like the Speedgoat. And finally, the XA Pro is pretty thin at the top—we once snagged a root, and it went straight through the mesh—and not everyone will love the Quicklace system, which has a tendency to gather fabric in weird ways and create pressure points along the top of the foot. But the XA Pro is nevertheless a reliable staple of the hiking footwear market and fits the bill for recreational hikers who stick to the trail.
Read more: Salomon XA Pro 3D V9 GTX review (men's version)
See the Salomon XA Pro 3D V9 GTX

 

15. La Sportiva TX4 Evo ($169)

Category: Approach shoe 
Weight: 1 lb. 12.4 oz.
Waterproof: No
What we like: Excellent grip on rock and stiff construction for rocky terrain; the latest Evo model has a nice sustainability slant.
What we don’t: Too stiff and clunky for easy trails; considerably heavier than the original TX4.

The La Sportiva TX4 Evo isn’t a hiking shoe per se, but it's nevertheless well deserving of a mention here. Designed as an approach shoe for climbers who routinely head off trail, it’s a fantastically tough and capable shoe that shines on challenging, mountainous terrain. A sticky Vibram sole means you get confidence-inspiring traction on rock, and the generous rubber rand and stiff midsole provide critical protection and stability while boulder-hopping or scrambling up slabs. To top it off, we’ve been particularly blown away by the TX4’s leather upper, which has withstood an incredible amount of abuse with no signs of wearing down (you’ll likely need a resole long before the upper starts to deteriorate).

It’s always risky business updating a legendary shoe like the TX4, and we have mixed feelings about the latest TX4 Evo. In addition to a sizable 7.6-ounce weight penalty (per pair) with this update, the TX4 Evo replaces the dotty tread of the original with diamond-shaped lugs, although the sticky “climbing zone” at the forefoot remains. La Sportiva also upped the sustainability focus with recycled materials and a new platform that can be resoled to maximize the shoes’ lifespan—both positive changes. Finally, sizing runs on the smaller end, including a noticeably narrower toe box that may pose issues for some. Updates aside, the TX4 still wouldn't be our first choice as a dedicated trail shoe: It’s stiffer than most hiking shoes (especially when compared to trail runners like the Speedgoat above) and lacks some bite in dirt and soft ground.
Read more: La Sportiva TX4 Evo review (prior version)
See the La Sportiva TX4 Evo 

 

 

16. Brooks Catamount 4 ($170)

Category: Trail runner
Weight: 1 lb. 1 oz.
Waterproof: No 
What we like: The lightest shoe on our list; plusher and more agile than Brooks' Cascadia above.
What we don’t: Decidedly more trail runner than hiking shoe.

With a similar design but more agility than the Cascadia above, the Catamount 4 is a staff favorite thanks to its nimble feel, low weight, and nicely padded midsole. Brooks took design and material inspiration from their Hyperion road runner, retaining that shoe’s feathery and highly responsive personality but with added traction and durability for hiking. Last year's update to the Catamount featured a more streamlined upper with a bit of added room in the toe box, which this year's 4 maintains. The 2025 version adds a few other significant updates, such as the integration of Brooks' SkyVault plate, which gives the latest shoe a stiffer, more responsive feel, and the addition of 2 more millimeters of midsole height for a whopping 34 millimeters under the heel and 28 under the toe. 

These updates added less than a quarter-ounce to the shoe, allowing it to still come in at a scant 1 pound 1 ounce for the pair. It remains the lightest option on our list, which has its pros and cons. While we like the emphasis on speed for fast-moving trail days, the Catamount won’t be mistaken for a true hiking shoe—even trail runners like the Salomon XA Pro 3D above are noticeably more robust and supportive underfoot, although the Salomons are heavier than the Catamount by 5.2 oz. per pair. In other words, the Catamount is a great quiver-of-one choice for trail runners who like to mix in fast-paced day hikes, but it’s underbuilt for shuttling a full load over long distances. For that, we’d opt for a more well-rounded trail runner like the Hoka Speedgoat or Altra Lone Peak above.
See the Brooks Catamount 4

 

17. Keen Targhee IV Vent ($150)

Category: Hiking shoe 
Weight: 1 lb. 13.1 oz.
Waterproof: No (available)
What we like: A durable trail workhorse.
What we don’t: Pricier than the Merrell Moab above without enough to show for it.

Keen's Targhee IV Vent is a classic hiking shoe that goes head-to-head with designs like Merrell's Moab 3 above. The leather upper and sturdy outsole aren’t particularly lightweight (especially compared to modern trail runner-inspired designs), but the benefits are excellent stability over rough terrain, great long-term durability, and impressive all-around protection for your foot. The Targhee also boasts a noticeably wide toe box, which is great for accommodating swollen feet and a nice alternative to some of the narrower designs here. If you’re in the market for a leather hiking shoe, Keen's Targhee Vent is certainly worth adding to your list.

Among traditional day hiking options, the Keen Targhee IV Vent and Merrell Moab 3 are two of the most popular shoes on the market. Both are very comfortable right out of the box, offer plenty of support and traction for non-technical trails, and can even get the job done on shorter backpacking trips. But while the Targhee’s nubuck leather upper is a little more durable than the mesh used on the Moab, we’re not sure it’s worth the $30 bump. Further, within this price class, the Keen contends with more modern designs like the Salomon X Ultra 5 above, which offers a closer fit and better performance overall. And with last year's update, weight jumped a considerable 4.4 ounces per pair, although the Targhee's updated polyurethane midsole is designed to boost underfoot protection and compress less over time. For those who frequently hike in wet climates like the Pacific Northwest, the design also comes in a waterproof version for $160.
See the Keen Targhee IV Vent

 

18. On Cloudrock Waterproof Low ($180)

Category: Hiking shoe 
Weight: 1 lb. 7.4 oz.
Waterproof: Yes
What we like: Good support, stability, and protection in a quick-moving design.
What we don’t: Stiff and pricey; outsole accumulates debris and mud.

Best known for their distinctive outsole, Swiss running brand On entered the hiking market a few years ago with a small selection of trail-ready designs. They've since increased this selection, discontinuing our previously listed Cloudwander Waterproof and introducing the Cloudrock Waterproof. Similar to the Cloudwander, the Cloudrock combines the stability and protection of a hiking shoe with the agility of a running shoe, featuring a rockered design that encourages a fluid stride alongside generous toe and heel protection and TPU overlays. You also get decent waterproofing by way of On’s in-house waterproof membrane. And unlike many of the shoes above, the Cloudrock's design is a nice crossover for in-town use. 

We have experienced comfort issues with On's CloudTec cushioning though, and haven't necessarily found it comfortable for all-day wear. We've taken On's hiking shoes both day hiking and backpacking—on easy trails and over cross-country terrain—and found them to be fairly stiff and unforgiving. What’s more, the outsole channels have a tendency to accumulate debris and mud, flinging it onto our hiking pants with each step. And while the reinforced upper will hold up to a lot of abuse (and the Cloudrock's upper is even more robust) we have durability concerns with the outsole, which packed out significantly during one short week of testing. We'll be able to provide more updates to our assessment of the Cloudrock once we have a full season of testing underway, so be sure to check back.  
See the On Cloudrock Waterproof Low

 

Women's Hiking Shoe Comparison Table

Shoe	Price	Category	Weight	Waterproof	Upper
Merrell Moab Speed 2	$140	Hiking shoe	1 lb. 3.4 oz.	No (available)	Synthetic/TPU
Hoka Speedgoat 6	$155	Trail runner	1 lb. 0.4 oz.	No (available)	Mesh
Merrell Moab 3	$120	Hiking shoe	1 lb. 9.1 oz.	No (available)	Leather/mesh
La Sportiva Spire GTX	$209	Hiking shoe	1 lb. 10.2 oz.	Yes (Gore-Tex)	Mesh
Altra Lone Peak 9	$140	Trail runner	1 lb. 2.6 oz.	No (available)	Synthetic/mesh
Salomon X Ultra 5 GTX	$170	Hiking shoe	1 lb. 6.6 oz.	Yes (Gore-Tex)	Synthetic
Danner Trail 2650	$170	Hiking shoe	1 lb. 2.0 oz.	No (available)	Leather/mesh
Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX	$180	Hiking shoe	1 lb. 8.8 oz.	Yes (Gore-Tex)	Leather
Topo Athletic Traverse	$150	Hiking shoe	1 lb. 1.4 oz.	No	Synthetic
Adidas Free Hiker 2.0 Low GTX	$180	Hiking shoe	1 lb. 15.1 oz.	Yes (Gore-Tex)	Synthetic
Salomon Elixir Activ GTX	$155	Hiking shoe	1 lb. 3.6 oz.	Yes (Gore-Tex)	Synthetic
Scarpa Rush 2 GTX	$199	Hiking shoe	1 lb. 6.2 oz.	Yes (Gore-Tex)	Mesh
Brooks Cascadia 18	$140	Trail runner	1 lb. 3.8 oz.	No (available)	Synthetic
Salomon XA Pro 3D V9 GTX	$160	Hiking shoe/trail runner	1 lb. 6.2 oz.	Yes (Gore-Tex)	Synthetic
La Sportiva TX4 Evo	$169	Approach shoe	1 lb. 12.4 oz.	No	Leather
Brooks Catamount 4	$170	Trail runner	1 lb. 1 oz.	No	Mesh
Keen Targhee IV Vent	$150	Hiking shoe	1 lb. 13.1 oz.	No (available)	Leather
On Cloudrock Waterproof Low	$180	Hiking shoe	1 lb. 7.4 oz.	Yes (in-house)	Mesh/TPU

About Our Testing Process

Hiking shoes come in all shapes and sizes, from burly leather designs for overnight backpacking with a full load to trail runners that have been adopted by long-distance thru-hikers who care more about weight than underfoot support. To supplement our unisex hiking shoe round-up, former senior editor Jenny Abegg put together our initial list of 19 women’s-specific designs in early 2022. An accomplished mountain runner based in the Pacific Northwest, Jenny’s ideal day starts and ends wearing a headlamp and gets her as far off the beaten path as possible. Contributing editor Maggie Slepian took over the guide in 2024, using her decade of technical gear testing and numerous thru-hikes to refine the list.

Our current lineup of 18 women’s hiking shoes is the result of our collective experiences both on and off the trail, along with feedback from our network of female testers and the online hiking community. As women who spend a lot of time outside, we’re intimately familiar with the plight of finding well-fitting shoes that are comfortable to wear all day, effectively balance weight and underfoot stability, and hold up well over time (there’s always a trade-off). When we test hiking shoes, we take them on everything from mellow day hikes to multi-day backpacking trips, paying close attention to the amount of padding underfoot, the level of grip on various types of terrain, and the quality of everything from the hardware and laces to the upper and outsole. We also consider protection—both at the front of the shoe and underfoot—as well as breathability and overall fit. As we continue testing, we’ll add and remove options above depending on their performance.
 

Women’s Hiking Shoe Buying Advice

• Women’s-Specific Hiking Shoes
• Hiking Footwear Types
• Weight
• Stability and Support
• Waterproofing
• Breathability
• Lacing Systems
• Upper Materials
• Midsoles: EVA Foam and TPU
• Outsoles and Traction
• Toe Protection
• Sustainability
• Hiking Shoes vs. Hiking Boots

Women’s-Specific Hiking Shoes

In 2025, the vast majority of hiking shoes come in both men’s and women’s versions. In general, women’s shoes are designed to fit narrower heels and higher arches, come in women’s-specific sizes and widths, and are offered in a different set of colorways. While the majority of our female friends wear women’s shoes, it’s important to note that some women might be better off opting for a men’s model (this is particularly important for those with high-volume feet). As with all clothing and footwear, your best bet is to try on before buying.
 

Hiking Footwear Types

Hiking Shoes
For most day hikers—and even a good number of backpackers and thru-hikers—a hiking shoe that falls just below the ankle is the perfect match. These shoes generally take on one of two forms: The majority are lightweight, trail-runner-inspired shoes like the Salomon Elixir Activ GTX and Topo Athletic Traverse, while more traditional holdouts are leather designs reminiscent of a hiking boot (but with a low top), such as the Keen Targhee and Merrell Moab 3. Regardless of the style, most of these shoes offer ample stability, protection, and traction for tackling rough trails with a load by way of stiff midsoles and outsoles, toe caps, and reinforced uppers. Hiking shoes also are great options for folks needing a substantial shoe for daily wear—just be aware that the outsoles will wear faster on pavement.
 

Trail Running Shoes
If moving fast trumps all else, we’d recommend a trail running shoe. These shoes, including the Hoka Speedgoat, Altra Lone Peak, and Brooks Cascadia are the ultimate lightweight option and beloved among thru-hikers on long trails like the PCT and AT. However, trail runners are really not intended as backpacking footwear: The flexible midsoles don’t provide much support on technical terrain or while carrying a heavy load, durability suffers, and you get very little toe and underfoot protection. But for easy day hikes or experienced backpackers, it's hard to knock the comfort you get with a flexible build and cushioning underfoot. We include some great trail running and hybrid options here, but you can find more of our picks in our article on the best trail running shoes.
 

Approach Shoes
The third option has a relatively narrow focus: climbers or hikers who need a grippy shoe to tackle steep, rocky terrain (often part of the “approach” to a rock climb). Approach shoes are easy to spot: They have a large rubber toe rand, to-the-toe lacing, and a sticky, low-profile rubber compound underfoot for maximum grip on rock (look for shorter and more rounded lugs). These shoes can be plenty comfortable on day hikes but aren’t what we typically recommend as a daily driver: the tread isn't as secure on muddy trails, and they’re stiffer than most hiking shoes, which will result in discomfort on high-mileage days. But if your hikes include a lot of scrambling or rock hopping, an approach shoe can be an excellent choice. We’ve included one model on this list (the La Sportiva TX4 Evo), but for a complete look at the market, check out our article on the best approach shoes.
 

Weight

Over the past decade, one of the most significant advances in hiking shoes has been the move to lighter-weight designs. Tough but thin fabrics and the rising popularity of trail runners have made putting on major miles a lot easier. As a result, all of the shoes on our list weigh well under 2 pounds for the pair, with some dropping to just over 1 pound—by comparison, a traditional backpacking boot like the Asolo TPS 520 GV Evo tips the scales at just under 4 pounds. It's true that the drop in ounces sometimes impacts long-term durability, but there are still a number of compelling options for traditionalists, including the leather Merrell Moab 3 and Keen Targhee line. But for most, a lightweight trail runner-inspired shoe is the best choice for day hikes, peak bagging, and quick overnight trips. As long as the rest of your gear is equally light, there are very few sacrifices.
 

Stability and Support

Regardless of whether you’re opting for a new-school synthetic model or a more traditional leather hiker, most hiking shoes retain good stability and support thanks to robust uppers and midsoles and relatively rigid soles. For example, despite having the appearance of a trail runner, the Scarpa Rush 2 GTX incorporates a stiff TPU frame and a burly sole that prioritizes durability and stability. What’s more, hiking shoes offer solid protection with toe caps, generous rands, and burly nylon or leather uppers. Of course, you don't get the added ankle support of a hiking boot, but most hiking shoes offer decent performance for tricky terrain or while carrying a load.
 

If you do choose to go with a lightweight trail runner, keep in mind that the trade-off is decreased stability and support. These shoes have more flexible midsoles, and the large dose of cushioning underfoot is great for comfort but offers less structure for off-camber sections of trail. The mesh upper of a trail runner also lacks around-the-foot protection and leaves your feet more vulnerable to roots and rocks. These are compromises that many day hikers (and well-conditioned backpackers) are willing to put up with for a more nimble, lightweight shoe. However, in most cases, we hesitate to recommend a trail running shoe for inexperienced hikers and difficult trails, including off-trail scrambling.
 

Waterproofing

Most of the hiking shoes here come in both waterproof and non-waterproof versions. The extra protection that comes with a waterproof and breathable membrane inserted into the shoe is a nice security blanket if you plan to hike in the mountains or in shoulder-season conditions, where wet feet can grow cold quickly. In theory, these shoes should keep your feet dry during creek crossings, surprise rainfall, or if you hit snow on an early-season trek. If you go this route, we’ve found Gore-Tex models to work consistently well, and many in-house designs are similarly capable of keeping water out, though breathability is a different story.
 

However, there are a number of downsides to going with a waterproof shoe: The extra layer adds weight, impacts breathability fairly significantly (discussed below), and will run you around $20 to $30 more. Further, if you do get water inside your shoe (not a difficult task with a low-top design), it doesn’t drain as well and won’t dry out nearly as quickly as a non-waterproof option. If you tend to get out only in the summer months or live in a hot or dry area, we recommend a non-waterproof shoe in most cases. Another option that we’ve adopted for snowy summer hikes is to pair a non-waterproof shoe with a waterproof sock. This lends a lot of versatility: You get protection when you need it, but your shoe will still dry out quickly after a dousing. For more on the waterproofing debate, see our article Do You Need Waterproof Hiking Shoes?
 

Breathability

The truth about waterproof liners, even expensive Gore-Tex booties, is that they don’t breathe well—just as a waterproof jacket won’t be as breathable as a comparable non-waterproof version. Simply put, waterproof membranes restrict a shoe’s ability to pull moisture away from your sweaty feet as efficiently as a non-waterproof upper. Not all non-waterproof shoes should be treated equally, however. Footwear that features thinner fabrics and a lot of mesh will increase moisture transfer and airflow, which will keep feet less sweaty in hot weather as well as dry out soggy socks far more quickly. On the other hand, full-on leather shoes with built-in waterproofing—the Keen Targhee IV Waterproof comes to mind—will be among the least breathable.
 

Lacing Systems

Easily overlooked, laces—as well as the lacing system of hooks and eyelets—play an essential role in fit and comfort. If a shoe has a poor lacing system that is prone to loosening, you’ll find yourself having to readjust constantly on the trail. If the system itself doesn’t secure your heel very well, the up and down walking motion will create hot spots and blisters. If the culprit is just the laces themselves, it’s an easy fix: There are a number of quality replacement laces available. But if the system design doesn’t hold your foot very well, we recommend looking elsewhere.
 

Some models, including the Salomon X Ultra 5 GTX and XA Pro 3D V9 GTX, have a single-pull lacing system. The design is very convenient, and we’ve had no more issues with durability than traditional laces. One thing to keep in mind, however, is that you aren’t able to adjust the tension between eyelets, so the fit will be equally tight across the entire foot. In other words, those with finicky feet that need to fine-tune their laces to be comfortable may be better off avoiding quick-lace designs.
 

Upper Materials

Hiking shoe upper material is not the most exciting topic, but checking the construction can give helpful insights into the shoe’s performance. The type of material used will correlate directly with a shoe's longevity, water resistance, and ability to breathe. Most often, hiking shoes are made with a mix of nylon, mesh, and leather to balance cost, weight-savings, and durability. Below, we spell out the pros and cons for the most common materials used for hiking footwear.

Synthetic Nylon and Mesh
Woven synthetic (often nylon) as well as open synthetic mesh panels are commonly used to aid breathability. These materials are not as well known for their durability, but they do a great job cutting weight and are generally easy to break in. Note that synthetic materials don’t conform to your foot over time as well as leather, but in most cases, the overall fit is still comfortable and snug. The majority of our favorite hiking shoes (and almost all modern designs) are made with synthetic materials, which provide a hard-to-beat balance of weight, durability, protection, and breathability.
 

Nubuck Leather
Made of full-grain leather but given a brushed finish that has a suede-like feel, nubuck leather is a common sight on heavier-duty hiking shoes. The soft-touch leather is lighter and more flexible than glossy, full-leather options and more durable than most nylons. It does fall short in breathability, however, and generally weighs more. As a result, it’s common to find a mix of leather and nylon mesh for abrasion resistance and breathability, as seen on the Merrell Moab 3 and Keen Targhee Vent. In the end, if you’re looking to prioritize durability and protection above all else, a leather hiking shoe is a good choice. But in general, these designs are a bit long in the tooth compared to modern synthetic shoes.
 

Midsoles: EVA Foam and TPU

The midsole of your hiking shoe functions to cushion your stride, working as a shock absorber from impacts and providing a stable base so your feet don’t have to work so hard on off-camber terrain. Depending on the design, midsoles vary from very thin (minimalist trail runner) to stiff and substantial (burly hiking shoe). Most include EVA, TPU, or a combination of both.

EVA
EVA foam midsoles are a common sight on running and hiking footwear. The cushy, soft material takes some of the sting out of both your heel impact and forefoot spring and is also extremely lightweight. While nearly all shoes on this list use some sort of EVA, designs can vary from super soft to mildly stiff. For logging serious miles on tougher terrain, we prefer a firm and supportive midsole as opposed to too much cushioning. If we’re planning on moving quickly on easy trail, softer cushioning is a better bet and commonly found in trail running designs like the Hoka Speedgoat. However, soft midsoles have a tendency to break down over time, so expect these shoes to pack out more quickly than dedicated hiking shoes.
 

TPU
Thermoplastic polyurethane, shortened (mercifully) to TPU, is a durable plastic commonly found in performance-oriented hiking shoes. Shoes that use TPU underfoot are often less cushy than those with only EVA but will last longer and provide better protection and stability underfoot. In addition, they’ll keep their shape longer and won’t be prone to compressing like EVA. Because both midsole types have valid applications and TPU is more expensive, it’s common for a manufacturer to use a TPU frame or heel for stability and toughness and add in EVA underfoot to increase comfort. Finally, the absence of TPU is a good way to differentiate a trail running shoe from a hiking shoe—most running designs forgo this plastic in order to stay flexible and cushioned, but the trade-off is less stability and isolation from rough terrain.
 

Outsoles and Traction

One of the hallmarks of a hiking shoe is good traction on a variety of terrain. In a way that more casual footwear can never match, hiking and trail running footwear are leaps and bounds better when the going gets rocky, slippery, and steep. Vibram is the gold standard when it comes to outsole rubber, but not all Vibram compounds should be treated equally: The rubber manufacturer tailors their blends and designs for the specific footwear and brand. Some shoes have much larger and sharper lugs underfoot for serious grip in mud, while others prioritize sticky rubber for scrambling over rocks.
 

Salomon is one brand that doesn’t outsource their traction needs. Instead, they use their in-house Contagrip for all of their hiking and trail running models. We’ve found the level of quality and performance is on par with Vibram’s offerings, from anything from their fast-and-light X Ultra 5 hiking shoes to the burly Quest 4 backpacking boots. Like Vibram, Contagrip compounds can vary between shoes and there are a number of different compounds, including Contagrip MA, MD, and TA.
 

Toe Protection

Hiking trails, even well-maintained ones, are full of rocks, roots, and other potential hazards, so we almost always recommend a hiking shoe with some type of toe cap. Lacking any protection on the front of your shoes can lead to a trip-ruining impact when you inevitably look up from the trail to enjoy the scenery. Hiking shoes typically have a full rubber toe cap, but trail runners sometimes have a trimmed-down version or none at all—one of the compromises in opting for a minimalist shoe. Approach shoes like the La Sportiva TX4 Evo, on the other hand, have exceptional protection with a standard wraparound rubber rand and stiff midsole and outsole.
 

Insoles

Just like with running shoes, the stock insoles that come with nearly every hiking shoe are generally fairly cheap. For some, this might not make a difference, but for others, it’s what separates comfort from misery. Thankfully, removing your insoles is super easy, and replacing them with an aftermarket model that’s specific to your foot size and shape can remedy most shoe maladies. New insoles can provide more or less volume to fill out the shoe, improve the fit under the arch, and increase or decrease the cushion and impact absorption. We recommend checking out Superfeet insoles for their wide selection of options and trusted reputation in daily shoes, ski boots, and hiking footwear.
 

Sustainability

In 2025, one of the main ways that brands are innovating is with sustainable design practices that seek to mitigate our impact on the planet. When it comes to footwear, manufacturers are turning to recycled and recyclable materials for everything from laces and lining to foam midsoles and rubber outsoles. Another way to shop sustainability is to keep durability in mind—if it fits your hiking style, a shoe with a more hardwearing upper and sole might last you twice as long as a trail runner, which cuts your consumption in half. Or, opt for shoes that are designed to be resoled, such as the La Sportiva TX4 Evo. It’s also worth noting services like Danner's Recrafting, which is committed to rebuilding and resoling footwear to keep it on the trail and out of the landfill. And when the time does come to retire your beloved hiking shoes, consider recycling them via programs like Ridwell or Terracycle.
 

Hiking Shoes vs. Hiking Boots

One of the biggest trends we see across the board in the outdoor space is the move towards lighter-weight gear. This is exemplified in the world of hiking footwear, where, in just a couple short decades, we’ve gone from 4-pound leather boots being standard issue to the majority of hikers now wearing lightweight hiking shoes or trail runners. However, hiking boots still have their place, particularly for rugged terrain and schlepping a heavy multi-day load. We also specifically recommend a mid-height shoe for those needing extra protection around their ankles.
 

The biggest point of differentiation between hiking shoes and boots is height: Shoes have a low-top fit, while boots generally sit above the ankle. Given their increased coverage, boots are able to offer a more secure fit, better stability, and more protection overall. Similar to hiking shoes, most modern hiking boots are built with lightweight materials and nicely balance agility and performance (even the Altra Lone Peak trail runner comes in the mid-height waterproof boot). That said, for anything but the most rugged of trails or the heaviest loads, we usually find ourselves reaching for a hiking shoe. You’ll have to decide for yourself, but both are viable options for day hiking, backpacking, and non-alpine peak bagging. For our breakdown of the top models on the market—including everything from mid-height trail running shoes to traditional leather designs—see our article on the best women's hiking boots.
Back to Our Top Women's Hiking Shoe Picks  Back to Our Women's Hiking Shoe Comparison Table