Best Trail Running Shoes of 2024

Running on varied and challenging trails is a welcome break from the monotony of pounding pavement (or even worse, the belt of a treadmill). Better yet, trail running is an immensely easy sport to get into and requires only minimal gear. Our team has clocked endless miles in just as many shoes to bring you our 17 favorites below, which cover everything from flexible and lightweight shoes for smooth trails to tough and stable designs for tackling technical or mountainous terrain. Whatever your speed, there's a shoe here for you. For more background information, check out our comparison table and buying advice below the picks, along with details about our testing process.

Editor's note: We updated this guide on November 27, 2024, to revamp our coverage on the Hoka Torrent, Nike Pegasus Trail, and Scarpa Golden Gate ATR, all of which were recently changed. We also added Nike's Zegama 2 to the list, removed a couple of discontinued shoes, and incorporated several photos from recent testing.
 

Our Team's Trail Running Shoe Picks

• Best Overall Trail Running Shoe: Salomon Sense Ride 5
• Best Budget Trail Running Shoe: Brooks Divide 5
• Best Max-Cushioned Trail Running Shoe: Hoka Speedgoat 6
• Best Light and Responsive Trail Runner: Brooks Catamount 3
• Best Trail Runner for Wide and/or Finicky Feet: Altra Lone Peak 8
• Best Running Shoe for Mud and Soft Terrain: Salomon Speedcross 6
• Best Running Shoe for Mountain Terrain: La Sportiva Bushido III

Best Overall Trail Running Shoe

1. Salomon Sense Ride 5 ($140)

Weight: 1 lb. 4.6 oz.
Cushioning: Moderate
Drop: 8mm
What we like: A versatile shoe for everything from daily training to mountain running.
What we don’t: Not a top performer in any one category.

For a trail runner that can do it all, we love the Salomon Sense Ride 5. Although not quite as snazzy-looking as some of the newer trail shoes, it’s not to be underestimated: The Sense Ride 5 is equally at home on quick door-to-trail runs as it is during ultra-distance pursuits and can even handle technical cross-country terrain with ease. The all-around performance isn’t surprising given the Salomon’s versatile design, which features a moderate amount of cushioning (29.6mm in the heel), generously sized toe box, fairly standard 8-millimeter drop, and full Contagrip rubber outsole. And it’s comfortable, too: During a 100-mile race a couple summers ago, we swapped to the Sense Ride 5 at mile 45 (after forming blisters in one of the aforementioned snazzy shoes) and wore it to the finish line without complaint.

But while the Sense Ride 5 is good at everything, it’s not necessarily a top performer in any specific category. Held up against specialists like Salomon's own Speedcross below, you give up a bit of protection, grip, and ground feel for challenging terrain, and the Sense Ride is not as soft and lightweight as a max-cushioned shoe like the Hoka Speedgoat below. But for a versatile trainer and adventure shoe that can handle most trails with aplomb, the Sense Ride 5 is one of the most well-rounded designs we’ve tried. And in an era when many trail runners are creeping close to $200, it’s also a solid value at $140... Read in-depth review (women's version)
See the Men's Salomon Sense Ride 5  See the Women's Salomon Sense Ride 5
 

Best Budget Trail Running Shoe

2. Brooks Divide 5 ($110)

Weight: 1 lb. 4.4 oz.
Cushioning: Moderate
Drop: 8mm
What we like: Very comfortable, great price, and excellent breathability. 
What we don’t: On the bulkier and stiffer side; not intended for technical trails.

The Brooks Divide 5 is an approachable and affordable shoe at just $110, but it punches above its weight class. Marketed as a road/trail hybrid, the Divide has performed admirably for us on every surface, though it excels on the trail. The TrailTack Green outsoles (which are 25% recycled) expertly handle steep slopes on loose dirt and gravel, and the grip on slick rocks makes stream crossings easier and decidedly less nerve-wracking. With a slipper-like feel and notably impressive breathability, this is a great option for warm weather and will dry quickly even when plunged into a river (we speak from experience). Protective thanks to a rigid toe and heel guards with just enough ankle support, this is a stable shoe for both beginning trail runners or anyone who wants an affordable workhorse to add to their quiver. 

The Divide can feel clunky and stiff on roads, but as a transitional shoe (as in, getting you from the sidewalk to the trail and back again), it is more than adequate. That said, while it handles slower paces like a dream, it struggles when trying to pick up speed—the Divide isn't the kick to choose to try to PR your next 5K. Additionally, if you are a more advanced runner, the lack of feeling on technical terrain and the inability to work up speed will be the biggest detractors. But for those who are newer to trail running or prefer less technical trails, the Divide 5 does everything it sets out to do. Of note: After 50+ miles and 6,500+ feet of elevation gain in the Brooks Divide 4, we're currently racking up the miles in the latest 5. We will report back if we feel any of our assessments above need to be amended as we get deeper into testing. 
See the Men's Brooks Divide 5  See the Women's Brooks Divide 5
 

Best Max-Cushioned Trail Running Shoe

3. Hoka Speedgoat 6 ($155)

Weight: 1 lb. 3.6 oz.
Cushioning: Maximum
Drop: 5mm
What we like: Standout comfort and traction in a lightweight package.
What we don’t: Thick midsole minimizes trail feel in technical sections; we liked prior versions better.

Hoka has built their reputation around plush, heavily cushioned running shoes, and the latest Speedgoat 6 is a nice upgrade to the popular design. With a thick midsole (40mm at the heel), the shoe offers maximum long-distance comfort and underfoot protection, absorbing a nice amount of impact with each stride. But there’s a lot more to love about the design: In our opinion, the Speedgoat hits a near-ideal balance of comfort, weight, protection, and responsiveness whether you’re running short or far, fast or slow. The aggressive outsole is light but sticky with substantial lugs (improved in the 5), blown rubber, and a Vibram Megagrip compound that holds well on everything from dry dirt and mud to steep rock. Tack on a medium-width toe box that fits a broad range of foot shapes, and it’s no secret why the Speedgoat has garnered such popularity over the years.

However, while the latest Speedgoat offers better stability and durability than previous models, it comes at the cost of less cushion and "spring"—one of the primary reasons many turn to Hoka in the first place. We've also found the 6 to be a bit more narrow (especially around the toe box) and less breathable due to its more abrasion-resistant materials. Finally, we wish the tongue were a little longer—we didn't have this issue with the 5, but the tongue on our 6 barely extends past the laces and can get sucked partway underneath if you're not careful. Despite these complaints, we still think the Speedgoat 6 is deserving of high praise as a surprisingly good all-rounder that offers exceptional comfort for long distances. It's for this reason that the Speedgoat has become a cult classic among ultralight backpackers, too—in fact, one of our editors hiked over 5,000 miles in four pairs of a previous model. And if the changes to the 6 turn you away, the Speedgoat 5 is still widely available at the time of publishing, although colorway options are limited.
See the Men's Hoka Speedgoat 6  See the Women's Hoka Speedgoat 6
 

Best Light and Responsive Trail Runner

4. Brooks Catamount 3 ($170)

Weight: 1 lb. 2.8 oz.
Cushioning: Moderate
Drop: 6mm
What we like: A lightweight shoe that can tackle both easy and technical trails at speed.
What we don't: Some ultra-distance runners will want a bit more cushion.

Brooks is best known in the trail running world for their Cascadia (below), a beloved shoe among both runners and thru-hikers that's now in its 17th generation. But the modern Catamount 3 here offers a whole different take on a trail runner, with a nimble design built to take on moderate distances at speed. Imported from Brooks’ Hyperion Tempo road shoe, the carbon-like DNA Flash midsole is lightweight and responsive, offering a snappy underfoot feel ideal for pushing the pace and precision on tricky sections of trail. Another highlight is the SkyVault propulsion plate, which protects your feet from rocks and boosts efficiency on the uphill. Whether you’re cruising gravel roads or going to battle on technical terrain, the Catamount is one speedy shoe to have on your team.

With a recent revamp, the Catamount 3 shaves a little weight (0.6 oz. per pair) off the prior version while also incorporating more recycled materials. Brooks also tweaked the fit of the upper for added comfort over long distances, although we'd still recommend sticking to about 50K or less (we wished for more cushion in the latter half of a 50-mile race with the past-gen "2," which had the same amount of padding). In terms of the competition, the Brooks is a versatile middle ground between speed-oriented shoes like the Hoka Torrent 4 below: You get a more substantial outsole than the former (better performance on technical trails), but a zippier and more locked-in feel than the latter (increased speed on runnable terrain). For a high-performance, race-day-oriented shoe that can do it all, look no further than the Brooks Catamount. Note: We haven’t tested the latest model yet, but given its similarities to the “2,” we expect overall performance to be largely similar (and will report back here after testing). 
See the Men's Brooks Catamount 3  See the Women's Brooks Catamount 3

Best Trail Runner for Wide and/or Finicky Feet

5. Altra Lone Peak 8 ($140)

Weight: 1 lb. 5.4 oz.
Cushioning: Moderate
Drop: 0mm
What we like: A very comfortable shoe that allows the foot to lie in its natural position; even lighter than the prior version.
What we don’t: Sluggish, slipper-like feel; too roomy for some.

If you’re among the myriad trail runners who suffer from pressure points, hot spots, and blisters resulting from ill-fitting shoes, this one’s for you. Popularized by the barefoot running movement, Altra’s zero-drop Lone Peak is arguably the most ergonomic and comfortable trail runner on the market. With a flat footbed and extra roomy toe box, the Lone Peak allows the foot to stay in its naturally prone and splayed position, which is great news for wide-footed runners or those with particularly finicky feet. We’ve recommended this shoe to dozens of friends and acquaintances who’ve struck out with more traditional shoes (including wide versions of models like the Hoka Speedgoat above) and have yet to lead anyone astray. 

The latest “8” is perhaps our favorite iteration yet: In addition to a more durable and abrasion-resistant ripstop mesh upper, Altra tacked on a unique “Ghillie” lacing system with optional pull-through points to fine-tune fit. In practice, we've been able to effectively cinch certain parts of the foot down while leaving others loose. True to its trail-worthy intentions, the Lone Peak also features a rock plate and gaiter attachments. That said, it’s important to keep in mind that the zero-drop design isn't for everyone, and those accustomed to a more traditional trail runner might find the Lone Peak rather sluggish, under-cushioned (you get just 25mm in the midsole), and lacking in arch support. But there’s a reason the Lone Peak has such a loyal following, especially among fast-and-light hikers. Of note: Altra recently released the Lone Peak 9, which features changes to the midsole and laces, along with stitch-free overlays to boost durability. We have yet to test it, but the 8 is still going strong at the time of publishing... Read in-depth Lone Peak 8 review
See the Men's Altra Lone Peak 8  See the Women's Altra Lone Peak 8
 

 Best Running Shoe for Mud and Soft Terrain

6. Salomon Speedcross 6 ($145)

Weight: 1 lb. 5.0 oz.
Cushioning: Moderate
Drop: 10mm
What we like: Truly excellent traction on soft ground.
What we don’t: Not versatile for easy trails or most mountain running.

The Speedgoat above is a nicely cushioned go-to for well-established trail networks, but it suffers on particularly soft terrain like mud and snow. In these conditions, you’ll want a full rubber outsole (the Speedgoat uses a combination of rubber and foam) with relatively long and widely spaced lugs that bite into the ground with each step. Salomon’s trail-eating Speedcross 6 sets the standard for this category, combining massive 5-millimeter arrow-shaped lugs and a supportive and snug-fitting upper for impressive control at speed. Tack on a thick midsole, single-pull lace system, and sturdy yet still reasonably light chassis, and you get one of the most capable trail designs, whether your run takes you over snow, sand, or wet leaves and thick mud.

Now in its sixth iteration, the latest Speedcross features a lightly revamped upper and outsole at slightly lower weight than its predecessor. In our opinion, the newest design is the most well rounded yet: You don’t get that tippy feeling we’ve found with previous versions, and the shoe even holds its own on short stretches of pavement during our door-to-trail runs. That said, the Speedcross is by no means a generalist, and most runners will find its tooth-like lugs and aggressive build to be overkill on easy trails and gravel roads. But for wet and rugged forest paths, the Speedcross 6 is incredibly purpose-built—even down to details like the anti-debris mesh upper and gusseted tongue. 
See the Men's Salomon Speedcross 6  See the Women's Salomon Speedcross 6

Best Running Shoe for Mountain Terrain

7. La Sportiva Bushido III ($145)

Weight: 1 lb. 5.2 oz.
Cushioning: Light/moderate
Drop: 6mm
What we like: A superb technical shoe with awesome traction.
What we don’t: Too much grip and not enough cushion for high-mileage outings and daily training.

In 2024, mountain athletes don’t think twice about taking on big, technical challenges with nothing more than a pair of running shoes and a day’s worth of supplies. Among the growing assortment of fast-and-light footwear options, many of our go-to shoes come from climbing specialist La Sportiva. Their versatile Bushido III is a perennial favorite and excels on all manner of terrain, from soggy trails and snow to fifth-class rock and loose talus. Grippy FriXion rubber (a compound used on some of La Sportiva’s climbing shoes) gives you solid traction while scrambling, and the burly tread grips remarkably well on soft terrain without being too overbuilt for firm ground. Tack on a durable upper (made more breathable with the latest update), protective toe cap, and rock guard under the forefoot, and the Bushido is a solid and confidence-inspiring workhorse of a shoe.

Compared to the Speedcross 6 above, the La Sportiva here has much more versatile intentions for a variety of on- and off-trail terrain. Further, mountain runners will love the shoe’s low stack height (19mm in the heel compared to the Speedcross’ 32mm), which lends stability and a solid ground feel. But all this performance does end up feeling a bit overkill on smooth paths, and the Bushido’s lightly cushioned midsole is noticeably less comfortable than all-around models like the Speedgoat or Sense Ride 5 above, especially on high-mileage days. But for technical missions that demand high precision and reliable grip—think high routes in the Cascades, the Sierra, and Colorado—the Bushido is hard to beat... Read in-depth review (women's version)
See the Men's La Sportiva Bushido III  See the Women's La Sportiva Bushido III
 

Other Excellent Trail Running Shoes

8. Salomon S/Lab Ultra 3 ($190)

Weight: 1 lb. 2.3 oz.
Cushioning: Moderate
Drop: 8mm
What we like: Salomon's most premium ultra-distance design; Courtney Dauwalter’s shoe of choice.
What we don’t: Expensive; not as plush as many long-distance shoes.

Salomon’s S/Lab series is home to their most innovative and high-performance footwear, and the Ultra 3 is the long-distance specialist. The shoe exudes premium quality from heel to toe and is a noticeable step up from the Sense Ride above. You get a lightweight yet durable mesh upper that’s both breathable and water-resistant (great for fending off light dew or small puddles), a stretch-knit collar that effectively keeps out trail debris, and a tried-and-true Contagrip outsole. And Salomon’s Quicklace system is far from a gimmick—it offers a snug fit and ensures that you’ll never have to stop during a race to retie your shoes. Finally, the S/Lab Ultra 3 features a rock plate and PU insert that add a good dose of underfoot protection and bounce. It all adds up to a zippy yet protective shoe for elite ultra-distance runners.

It’s tough to argue with a shoe that’s worn by the likes of Courtney Dauwalter and Killian Journet, but that doesn’t mean the S/Lab Ultra 3 is a great match for everyone. Our first gripe is price: At $190, it’s the second-priciest offering here—right behind the $195 NNormal Tomir 2.0 below, which is built for longevity. Second, while we generally like Salomon’s Contagrip rubber, it’s not particularly trustworthy on smooth, wet surfaces (like rock or steep pavement). And finally, while the Ultra 3’s midsole tech is great for protection and speed, it doesn’t provide the most plush ride, which is a worthwhile consideration if you run on hard surfaces (like gravel), tackle long-distance routes, or are relatively new to trail running. But for experienced ultra runners wanting to get the most out of their shoe, it’s a proven and capable option.
See the Salomon S/Lab Ultra 3

9. The North Face Vectiv Enduris 3 ($149)

Weight: 1 lb. 5.7 oz.
Cushioning: Maximum
Drop: 6mm
What we like: An affordable and comfortable daily training shoe.
What we don’t: Not particularly fast, especially compared to the more high-end Vectiv offerings.

The North Face hasn’t always been much of a player in trail running, but that all changed with the release of their Vectiv lineup. The growing collection now includes a gaggle of hiking and trail running offerings with a signature rockered sole and moderate-to-maximum midsole cushioning. The Enduris 3 here is the daily trainer, providing runners a plush underfoot feel (you get 31mm of cushion in the heel) and a responsive ride that’s forgiving enough to go all day. Tack on an airy mesh upper, full rubber outsole, accommodating fit, and increased stability via the Vectiv 2.0 midsole, and the latest Enduris stands out as one of our favorite all-rounders this year. 

We don’t blame you if the higher-end Vectiv Sky grabs your attention over the Enduris, with flashy selling points like a carbon-fiber plate and a number of notable podiums to its name. For experienced runners, this is a great race-day shoe that offers an excellent combination of speed and stability. But the more affordable Enduris is the indisputable daily driver, with a much more forgiving feel and fit for most feet. What’s more, you can even push it off-trail thanks to the tacky SurfaceCtrl rubber—the Enduris was the only shoe that fit our swollen feet during the latter half of the North Cascades High Route and got the job done on snowy, rocky, and loose terrain. All told, for a more cushioned alternative to an everyday shoe like the Sense Ride 5 above, the Enduris 3 is well deserving of a closer look.
See the Men's TNF Vectiv Enduris 3  See the Women's TNF Vectiv Enduris 3

10. Nike Zegama 2 ($180)

Weight: 1 lb. 6.6 oz.
Cushioning: Maximum
Drop: 4mm
What we like: Plush cushioning and reliable grip for logging serious miles in the mountains.
What we don't: Relatively heavy and expensive; we have mixed feelings about the built-in ankle gaiter.

Nike has put some serious R&D into their trail shoe lineup of late, and sitting at the top is their Zegama 2. Nike markets the shoe for endurance purposes—one shoe reads “All day,” the other “All night”—with a thick and responsive midsole that gives max-cushion competitors like the Hoka Speedgoat above a run for their money. We also love the Vibram Megagrip outsole, which features a series of multi-directional, V-shaped lugs that provide reliable grip on everything from loose dirt to smooth rock. And the 4-millimeter drop strikes a nice middle ground for most—especially compared to Nike’s own Wildhorse, which has a much more dramatic 8-millimeter drop.

On the trail, the Zegama 2 felt comfortable and locked-in out of the box. Our tester, who has blister-prone heels, didn’t experience any discomfort on runs ranging from short loops on local trails to high summits with miles of requisite talus-hopping and bushwhacking. One feature we aren’t sold on is the built-in ankle gaiter, which is very shallow (much smaller than what you get with Hoka’s Tecton X3, for instance) and resulted in a small gap above our heel at the start of each stride. Thankfully, this didn’t cause any friction-related problems, and the shoe did pretty well at sealing out small rocks and other trail debris. While not perfect, we came to appreciate the upgrade in protection compared to standard trail shoes. All in all, if you’re sold on a max-cushion design but want to retain as much technical prowess as possible, we really like what the Zegama 2 has to offer.
See the Men's Nike Zegama 2  See the Women's Nike Zegama 2

11. Topo Athletic Mtn Racer 3 ($150)

Weight: 1 lb. 4.2 oz.
Cushioning: Moderate
Drop: 5mm
What we like: A wonderful all-arounder that holds up well over the long term.
What we don't: The wide toe box might be a dealbreaker for some.

Topo Athletic might not be a household name like Salomon or La Sportiva, but their lineup of trail and road running shoes speaks for itself (not to mention, they’re founded by the former CEO of Vibram). The Mtn Racer 3 is a standout trail-specific model in their quiver: Like the Lone Peak above, it features a wide toe box that lends all-day comfort for swollen and hard-working feet (a big reason it's quickly becoming another thru-hiker favorite). But the Mtn Racer tacks on some technical chops, with a 5-millimeter drop (compared to the Altra’s 0mm), slightly firmer cushioning, a sticky Vibram Megagrip sole (a blend often used in approach shoes), and a small decrease in weight. Added up, it’s a great all-around kick for everything from easy to technical trails—short and fast or long and slow—and the durable build should last you upwards of 500 miles.

However, the Mtn Racer’s recent updates weren’t all positive for us. Topo increased the stack height by 3 millimeters and improved their ZipFoam cushioning, but the most noteworthy change came in terms of fit. While the Mtn Racer 2 nicely accommodated our wide feet, the roomier Mtn Racer 3 is a firm no-go: Despite employing every lacing technique in the book, we were unable to get a solid lock at the ankle and absolutely swam around in the shoe while running on our familiar home trails. For us, it’s a sad ending to a years-long running shoe love story, but if you’ve got a high-volume foot or are a fan of especially roomy toe boxes, the Mtn Racer 3 might still be a home run. In fact, we passed it along to a friend who was looking for a high-performance alternative to the Lone Peak, and she gave the shoe rave reviews.
See the Men's Topo Mtn Racer 3  See the Women's Topo Mtn Racer 3

12. NNormal Tomir 2.0 ($195)

Weight: 1 lb. 4.3 oz.
Cushioning: Maximum
Drop: 8mm
What we like: Designed by Killian Jornet—need we say more?
What we don’t: Expensive and runs a little big; for NNormal's high-performance offering, check out the Kjerag.

If you haven’t yet heard of NNormal, allow us to introduce you: This trail-focused company was founded in the fall of 2022 as a joint venture between Camper—a family-run shoe-making business based in Mallorca, Spain—and one of the greatest mountain athletes of all time, Killian Jornet. At the time of publishing, NNormal offers a small lineup of shoes and apparel, all designed with a focus on longevity and sustainability. Killian himself raced in NNormal prototypes for the 2022 race season, allegedly wearing the same shoe for his wins at both Hardrock and UTMB. If that’s not a glowing endorsement for performance and durability, we don’t know what is.

The Tomir—updated to the “2.0” not that long ago—is NNormal’s flagship all-rounder, marketed for everything from easy trails to speed workouts and peak-bagging (for a more performance-oriented option, check out the $195 Kjerag). A few key design features help the Tomir live a long life: The upper is stitched into the midsole, asymmetrical lacing reduces pressure and wear points, and the Vibram Litebase sole has proven both rugged and durable in our testing. Other areas where the shoe stood out were comfort and responsiveness, serving as our technically savvy daily driver for over 100 miles. And to streamline the design process, the unisex fit is accommodating to most foot sizes without stepping into truly wide toe box terrain, although those on the fence may want to size down (we did and were happy with the overall fit).
See the NNormal Tomir 2.0

13. Hoka Torrent 4 ($130)

Weight: 1 lb. 3.6 oz.
Cushioning: Moderate
Drop: 5mm
What we like: The plushness of a Hoka yet responsive and nimble; great grip.
What we don’t: Light cushioning is not ideal for high-mileage days; lacks the locked-in feel of most minimalist race shoes.

Running-shoe giant Hoka has built a name around their max-cushioned designs (as seen in the Speedgoat above), but the Torrent 4 bucks this trend with a lower profile that provides ample ground feel. It also features a single-layer mesh upper that’s both lightweight and breathable. The result is a responsive, agile Hoka that’s built for speed, making it great for race day and tempo workouts alike. And with Hoka’s proprietary sticky rubber sole and 5-millimeter multi-directional lugs (a bump up from the Torrent 3’s 4mm lugs), it holds its own on technical trails, too. We put over 300 miles into the past-generation model and came away impressed with its nimble yet plush feel combined with great traction on a variety of terrain. While we’re still in the process of testing the latest “4,” all signs are positive that it will live up to our high expectations.

Despite its Hoka heritage, the Torrent 4 won’t be the shoe most runners choose for long-distance efforts (think 50+ miles). In fact, we discovered this firsthand during a 100-mile race in the past-generation “3”: By mile 45, the combination of rocky terrain, streamlined cushioning, and air channels in the insole had led to blisters on the bottom of both feet—a first-time experience for us despite years of long-distance running. At the same time, the Torrent 4 lacks the locked-in feel we'd want for racing sub-ultra distances at speed. That said, it's nevertheless a very likable design for daily training runs and long-ish efforts on easy trails, and it doesn't hurt that it's one of the most affordable trail shoes here at just $130. To recap: There are faster shoes (from Hoka’s lineup, check out the Zinal 2), there are grippier shoes (namely those with Salomon's Contagrip or Vibram’s Megagrip rubber), and there are plusher shoes, but the Torrent puts it all together better than most, making it one of our go-to designs in Hoka’s lineup.
See the Men's Hoka Torrent 4  See the Women's Hoka Torrent 4

 14. Brooks Cascadia 18 ($140)

Weight: 1 lb. 7.3 oz.
Cushioning: Moderate
Drop: 8mm
What we like: A wonderfully comfortable and protective shoe for technical terrain.
What we don't: A bit too stiff and heavy to be a daily trainer.

Now in its 18th iteration, the Brooks Cascadia is one of the longest-standing trail runners on the market, and for good reason. This is a shoe that can do it all, with the traction and protection you need for rugged trails alongside a hefty dose of cushioning for long days out. Add to that a roomy toe box and an emphasis on stability, and the Cascadia is an easy-wearing shoe that's deservingly popular among a wide audience, from ultrarunners and daily joggers to mile-crunching thru-hikers (it’s gaiter-compatible, too). All told, it’s a workhorse shoe that will put a bounce in your step, which is never a bad combination. 

The Cascadia 18 remains the same as its predecessor in most respects, with the notable addition of a quick-drying mesh upper and overlays in high-wear areas to help improve durability. And despite the shoe’s wide base and all-terrain-vehicle feel, we’ve found it to be more precise than the boat-like Speedgoat above, even while traversing off-camber terrain. Of course, the Cascadia still can’t match the speed or light weight of some of the top models here, and we think it’s a bit overkill for a daily trainer (the 17 and 18 are an ounce heavier than the 16 for the pair). But for a trail shoe that will provide reliable stability and protection mile after mile—and double as a capable hiking shoe—the Cascadia remains one of the best all-rounders in the game.
See the Men's Brooks Cascadia 18  See the Women's Brooks Cascadia 18

15. Nike Pegasus Trail 5 ($140)

Weight: 1 lb. 5.2 oz.
Cushioning: Maximum
Drop: 9.5mm
What we like: A comfortable and responsive road-to-trail shoe.
What we don’t: Unstable on technical terrain and poor traction on wet surfaces.

Nike puts most of their efforts into road running gear, but their Pegasus Trail 5 is a quality, max-cushioned option for trail work. Modeled after the road-specific Pegasus but infused with trail features (including a mostly rubber tread and reinforcements in the upper), this is one of the best road-to-trail shoes in the business. The main event here is the large dose of Nike’s soft yet responsive ReactX foam, which offers great energy return as well as long-distance comfort. You don’t get that low-slung feel that many runners love for particularly technical trails, but the Pegasus Trail 5 offers a great fit for most (with a roomier toe box than many Nike models), and the latest version is lighter than its max-cushioned frame would suggest (although 0.6 oz. heavier than the outgoing "4").

Looking at Nike’s trail lineup, the Pegasus Trail is the clear all-rounder, sliding in next to the durable Wildhorse and light and speedy Kiger. Among the trio, the Pegasus Trail gets the edge in terms of comfort and high-mileage use, but it’s not particularly performance-oriented. The shoe’s max cushioning will feel unstable on rugged trails, and traction—although improved in the past couple versions—is among the worst here, especially on wet surfaces. But for max-cushioned comfort and undeniable style, Nike’s Pegasus Trail 5 is a great option for recreational trail runners, long-distance training, and road-to-trail routes.
See the Men's Nike Pegasus Trail 5  See the Women's Nike Pegasus Trail 5

 16. Scarpa Golden Gate 2 ATR ($169)

Weight: 1 lb. 2.0 oz.
Cushioning: Maximum
Drop: 4mm
What we like: A lightweight road-to-trail shoe that doesn’t compromise on trail performance.
What we don’t: Not everyone will love the firm cushioning.

Unless you’re one of the chosen few who lives just steps away from singletrack, a road-to-trail shoe can be a great pairing for training runs that start out your front door. With all-terrain (ATR) in its name, Scarpa’s Golden Gate 2 ATR is a stellar choice when your route involves a mix of pavement, gravel, and trail. We love this shoe’s attention to detail, including the breathable yet thoughtfully reinforced upper and dual-density midsole that’s softer at the heel (ideal for impact absorption) and firmer at the front for great spring and propulsion. In terms of cushioning, the Golden Gate 2 ATR is Scarpa’s plushest design yet, and we think they pulled off the comfort-versus-performance balance very well.

We tested the original Golden Gate ATR on everything from 6-mile pavement loops to longer on-trail jaunts and appreciated the shoe’s high-end fit, stable feel, and subtle rocker (based on initial reviews, it’s looking like the latest “2” will have similar appeal, but we'll report back after a thorough round of testing). But while the Scarpa is designed as a road-to-trail shoe, we certainly favor it for the latter: Its cushioning is surprisingly firm (much more so than the Speedgoat above, for example), and the outsole’s 4-millimeter lugs and sticky Presa rubber are most at home on mud, dirt, rock, and snow. Of course, it’s hard to find the best of both worlds—those who prefer a plusher road feel might opt for the Nike Pegasus Trail 5 above, but you’ll give up performance on the trail. For us, the Golden Gate 2 ATR is a fairly ideal compromise, and we expect the quality construction to hold up well over time.
See the Men's Scarpa Golden Gate 2 ATR  See the Women's Scarpa Golden Gate 2 ATR

17. On Cloudultra 2 ($180)

Weight: 1 lb. 4.8 oz.
Cushioning: Maximum
Drop: 6mm
What we like: The “2” is much improved from the outgoing version.
What we don't: Expensive and rocks get stuck in the outsole grooves.

Based in Switzerland, On is known for their innovative collection of road and trail shoes. It’s easy to tell an On design apart from the rest: Each model features their trademark CloudTec cushioning, a series of hollow cells that absorb impacts and keep your foot protected from sharp roots and rocks. Tack on a very premium build and an eye-catching aesthetic, and it’s for good reason that On shoes have become increasingly popular in the U.S. market. The Cloudultra is their most cushioned design for long-distance efforts, built to soak up varied trail surfaces and keep your feet happy mile after mile.

Updates from the past-generation Cloudultra include a softer midsole, improved stretch-knit collar, and new outsole that On claims offers 50% more ground contact. The result is a shoe that’s easier to step into (the first-gen version was a bear to get on and off), has much better traction, and provides a more forgiving feel—this is great news, as we found the original Cloudultra to be surprisingly firm. However, there’s no avoiding the inherent downfall of On shoes: The hollowed-out CloudTec midsole has a tendency to attract small rocks, which can grind away at both the foam and your foot during long runs. But this obvious flaw has yet to deter many runners, and the Cloudultra 2 is an undeniably fun alternative to traditional max-cushioned designs. Another plush On offering to consider is their Cloudsurfer Trail, which is a little cheaper but less technically capable than the Cloudultra—great for runs that involve a mix of pavement, gravel, and dirt.
See the Men's On Cloudultra 2  See the Women's On Cloudultra 2

Trail Running Shoe Comparison Table

About Our Testing Process

The Switchback Travel team has been cruising mellow mountain singletrack and boulder-strewn trails for years. Former editor-in-chief John Ellings and former senior editor Jenny Abegg drew from endless runs, races, and mountain scrambles—both locally in the Pacific Northwest and as far abroad as southern Patagonia—to curate our initial round-up of 10 shoes back in 2016. Senior editor Chris Carter took over the guide in 2024 with help from Ben Stalheim. An alumnus of the three Triple Crown trails (AT, PCT, and CDT) and dedicated ultra-marathon racer, Chris has worn down the tread of countless trail shoes over thousands of miles and is all too familiar with the sinking feeling of uncomfortable feet mid-run. Ben is a wildlife biologist based in San Diego who loves to trail run with his binoculars as a means to cover a lot of miles while birding. Together, they bring a wealth of knowledge and valuable perspective to this ever-changing review. 

Our selection of 17 trail runners you see today is a result of continued on-trail testing, along with feedback from seasoned contributors and the running community as a whole. We put trail runners through a variety of real-world tests—from short after-work jaunts on local trails to organized ultra-distance races—to gauge their performance. Stability, cushioning, traction, and weight are all key factors we look at when dissecting a shoe's merit, and each model has to prove itself over many miles (generally at least 50) before earning a spot on our list. Finally, as mentioned, we know that the competition for the trail shoe podium is fierce and constantly evolving. As a result, we continue to test new and noteworthy shoes as they become available, adding any standouts to our list along the way—so be sure to check in with us regularly.
 

Trail Running Shoe Buying Advice

• How to Choose a Trail Running Shoe
• Weight
• Traction
• Cushioning (Stack Height)
• Heel-to-Toe Drop
• Stability
• Waterproofing
• Breathability
• Toe Protection
• Rock Plates
• Mountain Running Shoes
• Road-to-Trail Shoe Recommendations

How to Choose a Trail Running Shoe 

Selecting the best trail running shoe is no small task and will come down to a variety of factors, including the style of running (terrain, distance, and speed) and your own preferences (desired feel and fit). We used to think it would be helpful to our readers to have our picks above divided into categories—a sort of “you tell us what type of trails you run, we’ll tell you what to wear.” But then we took a deeper look at our own shoe choices. We were consistently opting for an “easy trails” shoe for cross-country mountain runs (the Salomon Sense Ride) and cursing many of our “rugged trail" shoes on muddy singletrack. In the end, we realized that most running shoes defy categories and are far more about the synergy between the shoes, the terrain, and the runner. However, there are still a good number of clues that can help you narrow down your choice, which we dive into in greater detail below.
 

The good news is that most of the shoes here are great all-rounders, sufficient for most runners on most trails. Where you’ll really need to start thinking is if you have specific demands for a shoe, including if you want to go really far, really fast, or really remote. Here is where the specialists come in, which we detail in the write-ups above. In general, max-cushioned shoes are great for ultra distances (such as the Nike Pegasus Trail 5 or Hoka Speedgoat 6), streamlined and firm shoes are ideal for race day, and those who venture into off-trail terrain will want to prioritize protection, stability, and sticky tread above all else (check out the La Sportiva Bushido III). And take heart: This is a big decision but hopefully one you won’t have to make often. Most runners find a shoe (or shoes) that they love and just stick with it, year after year.
 

Weight

We put a high priority on weight when considering a trail running shoe. For 2024, our picks range from 1 pound 2 ounces for the Scarpa Golden Gate 2 ATR to 1 pound 7.3 ounces for the Brooks Cascadia 18. Of course, feathery designs will feel extremely light on your feet (great for speed), while heavier shoes feature maximum cushioning or are super tough and built for off-trail exploring. Not surprisingly, each design has compromises: The lighter options lack overall protection and support, while designs like the Cascadia can be fairly cumbersome on easy trail. In general, we find the sweet spot to often be right in the middle: This typically gets you enough protection and support for long distances without feeling sluggish.
 

Traction

Not all trail running shoes are created equal, and traction is one of the places we see the most variation. In general, the level of grip provided will closely follow the categories above. Shoes for easy trails feature a combination of outsole rubber and exposed midsole, which lends a lightweight, springy feel but suffers particularly on slippery rocks, roots, and mud. On the other hand, those built for rugged trails often have a full rubber outsole for approach-shoe-like traction in mountainous terrain (think snow, boulder hopping, and scree). All-rounders fall somewhere in between and are a great middle-ground option for most trail running objectives.
 

Looking closer at the nitty gritty of traction, an outsole’s rubber compound, tread depth, and tread pattern all play a role in maximizing grip. Starting with rubber compound, shoes that have sticky, approach shoe-like rubber like the La Sportiva Bushido III excel on rock, while others that have a softer and more pliable feel often do better in mud. Secondly, tread depth (or lug depth as defined by the height of the lugs in millimeters) isn’t listed by many manufacturers, but you can get a good idea of the size by looking at an image of the sole. Tall lugs like you’ll find on the Salomon Speedcross 6 provide excellent bite in loose ground, but the raised profile has a negative impact on stability. Finally, the tread design should be considered: Widely spaced, tall lugs with a soft compound will outperform tightly spaced, short lugs, and sticky rubber in mud, and the reverse is typically true over rock or hardpack.
 

Cushioning (Stack Height)

An area where manufacturers have tried to differentiate themselves is the amount of cushioning provided by their shoes. Known as the “stack height,” which is the measured height from where the foot sits inside the shoe to the ground, trail running models range from very thin to heavily cushioned. Minimalist designs only have a small amount of EVA foam in the midsole, which makes them extremely nimble and provides a close feel of the terrain. But the downside is the potential for some really sore feet as the miles pound on. On the other end of the spectrum are maximum-cushioned shoes from brands like Hoka and Nike (the Hoka Speedgoat 6 has 33mm of cushioning at the heel). These remind us a lot of a fat bike: The ride is smooth, and you barely notice the ground underneath, but there is more of a disconnect between you and the trail (and their tall heights can make them prone to rolling over).
 

Both minimalist and max-cushioned styles have their merits—and loyal fans—but in the end, most runners are happiest somewhere in the middle. Shoes like the Salomon Sense Ride 5 and Topo Athletic Mtn Racer 3 are springy and have enough squish to keep your feet happy on rough terrain and for long distances, but don’t sit too tall to compromise stability and confidence. It’s no accident most of the shoes we have listed above offer a moderate amount of cushioning.
 

Heel-to-Toe Drop

As the name indicates, the heel-to-toe drop is the difference in shoe height, where your foot sits, from the heel to toe. This spec was barely on the radar of folks outside the hardcore running community until the zero-drop fad hit a few years ago. Many all-rounder shoes have a drop in the range of 4 to 8 millimeters, which can work well for both heel and midfoot strikers. True zero-drop shoes have a 0-millimeter difference (Altra is a leader in this department), encouraging a mid- or forefoot landing point. And many models for rugged trails have the most dramatic drops, often 8 to 10 millimeters.

Our take is that drop is a matter of comfort and personal preference more than anything else. Many people like a moderate drop in their trail running shoes, while others prefer a zero-drop design (the Altra Lone Peak being the most popular example). The trend is toward lower drops for running shoes in general, although the performance and injury prevention science are hotly debated. The key is that you don't make a major change to an extreme end of the spectrum and then head straight out for a long run. Instead, if you're interested in a zero-drop design, try it out by easing in and developing confidence on the trail. This will reduce the chance of injury and ensure that it's the right choice for you.
 

Stability

Trying to move fast over rough terrain in a pair of lightweight low-top shoes may seem like asking for an injury (and it can happen), but today’s trail running shoes do offer a stable ride that is resistant to ankle rolls. It starts with a solid platform, which is wide and rigid enough to sustain hard impacts on uneven ground (this platform is pronounced on a highly stable shoe like the Topo Athletic Mtn Racer 3 or Altra Lone Peak). The chassis, which is the perimeter of the base of the shoe, is beefed up with trail runners to create that solid base. In addition, some shoes include a shank, which is a semi-rigid piece of plastic or nylon that’s been slid in-between the midsole and outsole for added stiffness. Finally, some manufacturers create what amounts to a partial plastic exoskeleton around the heel cup for added structure and rollover protection. The relative stiffness and stability of a shoe will most often correlate with its intended use: A mountain-oriented shoe like the La Sportiva Bushido III is stiffer and has more of a structure, while easy trail options are more flexible and comfortable out of the box.
 

Waterproofing

Rain and wet conditions don’t stop most trail runners from getting out, but wet feet can be a big reason for going home early. For this reason, many of the shoes above are offered in waterproof versions, which feature a waterproof and breathable membrane (usually Gore-Tex) in between the outer fabric and the shoe’s inner lining. These shoes are generally a few ounces heavier per pair and $15 to $40 more, but the waterproofing is very effective and especially makes sense in cold weather, when wet feet become cold feet in a hurry.
 

That said, we’re not huge fans of waterproof trail running shoes, for a number of reasons. Our main gripe is that waterproof membranes have a significant impact on breathability, creating a ripe situation for clammy feet. What’s more, drying time suffers, with no way for water (or sweat) to leave once it's inside. Further, while they guard against low-lying puddles and streams, waterproof shoes do nothing to prevent water entering at the ankle. In the end, we can see the appeal for shoulder seasons or winter, but for most runners the tradeoffs simply aren’t worth it. And if you want to add waterproof protection without a brand new shoe, we highly recommend waterproof socks (like these from SealSkinz), which are easy to take off and stow in your pack during long stretches of dry trail. For more on this topic, check out our article: Do You Need Waterproof Hiking Shoes?
 

Breathability

A sweaty foot is an uncomfortable foot, which is the last thing you want to be thinking about while wheezing your way up a steep climb. As such, the ventilating ability of a shoe is one of the most important factors for runners. Nylon mesh is a common material used in trail running shoes for the obvious benefit of increased breathability. To retain durability, many manufacturers use a combination of a tight weave and thin fabric to both resist tears and keep air flowing. And as we’ve found, some are more accomplished than others. The mesh-heavy Hoka Speedgoat is one example of a shoe that's a boon on long runs in the heat of summer.
 

Toe Protection

Trail running naturally puts you in terrain far more challenging and potentially hazardous than what you’ll find around town. As such, you’ll want some added protection from your shoe’s construction. Almost without exception, trail running shoes have some type of toe protection, usually in the form of a rubber toe guard or cap that is capable of absorbing direct hits pretty well. Because of the lightweight intent of a trail runner, the toe protection isn’t as substantial as a hiking shoe, but it should prevent your toes from turning black and blue should you accidentally kick a rock or root on the trail.
 

Rock Plates

Much in the same way that a protective toe cap isolates you from a sharp rock or other trail debris, lightweight rock plates are inserted between the midsole and outsole on many trail shoes. These plates vary in thickness, coverage, and materials, ranging from thin and flexible ESS foam under the ball of the foot to a stiff TPU shank. How much protection is needed depends on personal preference and the terrain you'll be running over (more miles on rough trails will merit burlier protection), but overall, we find rock plates to be a great feature. They’re unobtrusive, keep foot soreness to a minimum, and only add a small amount of weight.
 

Lacing Systems

Laces are easy to overlook but play a fundamental role in comfort. Most shoes use a standard lace-up method, but brands like Salomon are doing things differently with a single-pull “Quicklace” system on their trail runners. We love this design on the Speedcross 6, Sense Ride 5, and S/Lab Ultra 3 for its ease of use and speed. It only requires a single pull, and then you can tuck away the excess laces and forget about them. We’ve found that the laces hold securely—better than some traditional sets in fact. There is a potential downside, though: For those with finicky feet who need to customize the fit around certain parts of their feet, there isn’t really a solution with quick laces—they will fit equally tight all around. Accordingly, we recommend avoiding them if you often struggle to achieve a good fit. Another noteworthy design is Altra’s “Gillie” system on their Lone Peak 8, which allows you to route the laces through longer conduits that run vertically up the shoe or feed them through the holes at the sides. This gives runners with sensitive or hard-to-fit feet a little more flexibility with fine-tuning fit. 
 

 Mountain Running Shoes

Mountain running is experiencing a huge growth spurt, with more and more enthusiasts ditching heavy overnight gear for a pair of running shoes and a light pack. By our definition, this style of running takes you off trail and into cross-country zones, where you might encounter anything from technical rock climbing and talus or boulder fields to glacier travel and steep snow—think ridge scrambling in the Rockies or peak bagging in the North Cascades. And you’ll need just the right footwear to tackle this complex terrain: A shoe that combines the light weight and comfort of a trail runner with the stability, grip, and durability of an approach or hiking shoe. (Note: By another definition, mountain running is a USA Track & Field sanctioned sport in which elite runners race on short and steep courses—importantly, this is very different from the form of mountain running we discuss here and requires a whole different skillset and a focus on much lighter-weight footwear.)
 

Fortunately, a whole new class of mountain running-specific shoes has emerged recently, engineered especially for off-trail trickery. La Sportiva leads the field here, but designs from brands like Arc’teryx, Dynafit, Salomon, and Scarpa come in close behind (some of our favorites include the La Sportiva Cyklon, La Sportiva Bushido III, and Scarpa Ribelle Run). Within this category, look for sticky rubber outsoles (Megagrip and FriXion are common compounds) with shallow lugs and even a smooth patch near the toe for climbing performance. Many will feature a lower, more planted feel for stability on off-camber terrain, aided by moderate to light cushioning in the midsole. Finally, they’re relatively stiff and have highly durable and protective uppers (we often strap crampons or microspikes to our mountain running shoes). In our picks above, we make sure to call out the shoes that are specially designed for off-trail mountain travel. For more, check out our editor's picks for the best mountain running gear. 
 

Road-to Trail Shoe Recommendations

If you’re anything like us, your daily runs leave from your front door and include a combination of pavement and trail. That’s all well and good, until you consider that the trail running shoes here are not designed to run on pavement. With full rubber soles, firm midsoles, and more protective uppers, they’ll feel overbuilt and heavy. What’s more, they often use softer rubber compounds that will wear out prematurely if subjected to a lot of road running. 
 

A few hybrid designs toe the line between the two worlds, including the Hoka Challenger 7, Topo Athletic MT-5, and Altra Outroad 3, but their trail performance is so middling that we don’t include them on the list above. However, looking at our picks, there are a few trail-ready models that stand out as being able to handle the road better than most, including the Nike React Pegasus Trail 5, Scarpa Golden Gate 2 ATR, and Brooks Divide 5. These shoes often feature some of the same components as road running shoes, including soft midsoles and airy mesh uppers. Don’t expect them to be particularly great performers on pavement (the trail-ready rubber outsole will feel decidedly clunky), but they’ll get you from your doorstep to the trail—and back—better than most.
 

Hiking and Backpacking in Trail Running Shoes

In recent years, trail running shoes have taken off as a go-to choice for day hikers, fastpackers, and thru-hikers alike. And it makes a lot of sense: With a lightweight and flexible feel but solid traction, you can cover more ground with less effort. Further, most day hikers and thru-hikers keep pack weight to a minimum, so there’s less need for the stability and ankle support of a sturdy shoe or boot. In fact, we’ve spoken to some PCT thru-hikers who made the switch from boots to trail runners mid-trip, and they’ve had nothing but good things to say about their levels of comfort and nimble feel—provided they kept their pack weight down. Brooks' Cascadia has long defined this category of crossover trail shoes, and we see a lot of hikers wearing the Hoka Speedgoat 6 and Altra Lone Peak 8, too. For reference, one editor who hiked the Triple Crown had nothing but rave reviews for both the Lone Peak and Speedgoat after thousands of miles of hard trail. Once he found the joy of hiking in trail runners, he never looked back.
 

But there are a number of obvious issues. One is durability. It’s unlikely you’ll get as many miles out of your trail runners as you would a lightweight hiking shoe or full-on hiking boot, which are designed to handle more use and abuse. Second, with minimal materials and bulk, a trail runner simply does not offer the same amount of protection as beefier hiking footwear, especially those with generous rubber rands and leather uppers. Finally, we don’t recommend trail running shoes for heavy loads or particularly rugged terrain, when you’ll want a more supportive option. But despite these potential downsides, trail runners seem to be here to stay as a popular hiking and backpacking option, and models like the Lone Peak and Speedgoats offer more durability over the long haul than one might imagine. If you want to take a deeper dive into the available options, check out our article on Hiking Shoes vs. Trail Runners. 
Back to Our Trail Running Shoe Picks  Back to Our Trail Runner Comparison Table