Unlike their lift-assisted alpine cousins, backcountry skis have two jobs: getting you uphill efficiently while retaining enough power to make the downhill worth the effort (and fun). The good news is that material and construction technologies are growing rapidly with the recent boom in the sport’s popularity, and many of today’s alpine touring skis are impressively polished and a treat to drive. Below we break down our top backcountry skis for 2021, which range from lightweight models for long tours and mountaineering to hybrid skis that can pull double duty on the skin track and at the resort. For more background information, see our backcountry ski buying advice and comparison table below the picks. To complete your set-up, see our article on the best backcountry ski boots.
Weight: 6 lbs. 10 oz.
Widths: 85, 95, 105mm
What we like: A versatile touring set-up that is efficient on the uphill and fun on the descent.
What we don’t: Not the best ski for serious, big-mountain objectives.
Blizzard’s Zero G collection has legions of fans, and the latest model is about as well-rounded as it gets. Tipping the scales at well under 7 pounds for the pair, the ski is light and easy to maneuver on the climbs but really comes to life when you point it downhill. With a multi-layer carbon build, it’s sturdy enough for variable conditions and decently high speeds, and there’s a surprising amount of forgiveness that makes it a reliable partner in unfamiliar terrain. Further, the Blizzard’s 105-millimeter width hits the sweet spot for season-long use on all but the deepest days.
Who is the Zero G 105 best for? Anyone from newbies to dedicated backcountry enthusiasts should find a lot to like with the construction. That said, it does come up a little short in edge grip and isn’t as burly on the descent as the DPS options or the Black Crows Navis below. In addition, the ski’s wide 23-meter turn radius makes it a little trickier to manage in tight spots, although this certainly plays a role in its trustworthy and planted feel. In the end, there are more capable descenders on the market, but the Zero G’s combination of low weight and confidence-inspiring performance make it our top backcountry ski for 2021.
See the Blizzard Zero G 105
Best High-End Backcountry Ski
Weight: 6 lbs. 7 oz.
Widths: 94, 106mm
What we like: Top-end craftsmanship and standout performance with few compromises.
What we don’t: Too pricey for casual backcountry skiers.
The backcountry ski market has exploded in recent years with a seemingly endless array of options, but for true powder hounds, DPS Skis stand out from the pack. The beautifully crafted Pagoda Tour 106 C2 puts together the brand’s strongest traits: the ski is impressively lightweight for climbing at 6 pounds 7 ounces, has a great shape for smooth operation on the downhills, and boasts a premium construction that’s built to last. These skis are made for soft snow, but in the 106-millimeter waist (as well as the slimmer 94), they’re also surprisingly versatile.
The Pagoda Tour’s price at well over $1,000 might make it a quiver of one by necessity, but this is a case where we think the performance and build quality justify the steep fee. The design is absolutely packed with high-end materials, including two horizontal layers of wood sandwiched between layers of carbon fiber (both unique concepts) that deftly balance power, dampness, and weight. We’ve chosen their C2 shape here for its well-rounded nature, but those who prefer a nimbler and even more playful ride should check out the RP variations (offered in 100 and 112mm widths). With either option, you’re getting a true standout performer.
See the DPS Pagoda Tour 106 C2
Best Ultralight Backcountry Ski
Weight: 5 lbs. 11 oz.
Widths: 88, 95, 104, 115mm
What we like: Superlight and efficient for long days in the backcountry.
What we don’t: Narrow for season-long use.
Black Diamond’s updated Helio Carbon line reaches as wide as 115 millimeters, but we love the nimble performance and efficiency of their thin, 88-millimeter version. Obviously, the narrow build cuts weight, and at 5 pounds 11 ounces (170cm length), it’s an ideal partner for very long treks and ski mountaineering. But what’s most impressive is how confidently the 88 tackles technical terrain. The ski is reasonably stable at speed, and its full-length paulownia core and more pronounced tip and tail rocker outperform expectations off-piste. All told, the Helio Carbon is well-equipped for anything from dawn patrol laps at a local hill to extended fast-and-light missions.
If we were to choose a single touring ski, however, BD’s Helio Carbon 88 wouldn’t be it. Even with the revisions to the rocker profile and greater use of wood, the trimmed-down build struggles in deeper conditions. Further, the lightweight front end can get tossed around more than we’d like in variable snow—it’s most comfortable in powder or spring corn. But if weight wins out and you don’t want to spring for a compromised skimo design, the Helio Carbon is a great choice.
See the Black Diamond Helio Carbon 88
Best Backcountry Ski for Powder
Weight: 7 lbs. 15 oz.
What we like: They’re a blast in powder.
What we don’t: Not as fun in other conditions.
Moment’s Wildcat Tour is the lightened and tour-afied version of one of our all-time favorite powder skis: the Bibby Pro. At 116 millimeters wide and with a rockered profile and early-rise tip and tail, the Wildcat Tour is unapologetic about its powder-loving ways. It’s an effortless performer that has proven to be surprisingly adept at cutting through trees or flowing through narrow shoots. Moreover, the lighter Wildcat Tour adds a flickable nature to the fun and playful feel of the Bibby Pro.
With such a strong emphasis on powder, the Wildcat Tour probably shouldn’t be the only ski at your disposal. Even at a reasonable 8 pounds for the width, the wide footprint means the ski isn’t as suitable as others for long missions. And the design is totally out of place on firm snow and ice, so be sure to have confidence in the forecast and conditions before heading out the door. Get it right, though, and you’re almost guaranteed to have a big smile on your face.
See the Moment Wildcat Tour
Best Crossover Backcountry/Resort Ski
Weight: 6 lbs. 12 oz.
Widths: 98, 108, 118mm
What we like: A playful do-everything option.
What we don’t: A bit heavy for dedicated backcountry use.
The skis above have been built from the ground up for touring performance, but Armada’s updated Tracer line offers a satisfying mix of all-mountain and backcountry design. Their 108-millimeter ski is popular among soft-snow enthusiasts, but we prefer the slightly narrower and nimbler Tracer (and women’s Trace) 98 to keep weight down and elevate its hybrid nature. The ski has camber underfoot and Titanal reinforcements around the binding for impressive power and stability for resort days, but the lightweight construction and softer front end make it dance nicely in powder.
Trying to be everything to everyone does mean the Tracer 98 comes with a few compromises. For touring, it’s a little on the heavy side for its width, and it’s not a go-to ski for long missions. In addition, the lightweight design can be skittish in icy conditions and there’s a tendency to chatter at Mach-looney on firm snow (although most alpine touring skis will do the same). But for folks transitioning from the resort to the backcountry or wanting to split their time evenly between the two, the Tracer 98 is a fantastic choice.
See the Armada Tracer 98 See the Women's Armada Trace 98
Best of the Rest
Weight: 7 lbs. 8 oz.
What we like: Strong, smooth, and trustworthy on the descent.
What we don’t: Not a weight leader.
With their home nicely situated in the Alps in Chamonix, France, Black Crows has strong alpine and backcountry roots. And although they’ve only recently entered the U.S. market, their Freebird touring skis have quickly become a staple in areas like Jackson Hole. We like their jack-of-all-trades Navis Freebird best, which at 102 millimeters wide is a very versatile ski. It’s proficient on the climb up but truly excels on the descent, with a smooth and very confidence-inspiring feel in just about all conditions. The ski is comfortable and easy to manage in everything from open bowls to tight and fast couloirs.
Compared to our top picks, the Navis falls short in weight by about a pound, which is a notable downside for extended tours and times when you have to strap it to a pack. On the flipside, the weight is put to good use and the ski is one of the strongest performers on this list in variable snow conditions. Like the Tracer above, this do-everything nature makes it a suitable choice for crossover resort use with a hybrid binding like the Salomon Shift or Marker Duke PT. Finally, big mountain chargers and those lucky enough to have consistently deep snow should check out Black Crow’s 110-millimeter-wide Ferox Freebird.
See the Black Crows Navis Freebird
Weight: 6 lbs. 3 oz.
Widths: 80, 84, 88, 96, 106mm
What we like: Great price for a beginner/intermediate-friendly build.
What we don’t: Certainly not the fastest or most playful ski on this list.
K2 has a proud backcountry heritage with skis like the Coomba (previously the Coomback), but they’ve kept things simple this season with a single line of Wayback and women's Talkback skis. Ranging from 80 to 106 millimeters, the medium-width 96 brings out its best qualities. The ski is quick to turn, handles chopped-up snow well, can take a beating when raked over rocks and other debris, and is reasonably light. Another feather in the Wayback’s cap is value: at $700, it undercuts alternatives like the $800+ BD Helio Carbon above without making compromises in material quality.
While hard-driving experts will find the Wayback to be a little too soft, we think the K2 is among the best options for those just getting into the sport. It’s easy to ski, feels a lot like an alpine model with its mixed rocker/camber and decent edge hold (for a lightweight model, of course), and has just enough Titanal in the construction to be reasonably damp and smooth. It’s true that there are more fun and capable models available, but the K2’s approachable construction is a near-ideal pairing for beginner and intermediate backcountry skiers.
See the K2 Wayback 96 See the Women's K2 Talkback 96
Weight: 6 lbs. 3 oz.
What we like: Fun factor and great all-around performance at a good value.
What we don’t: DPS gets the nod for powder.
Utah-based Voilé has a strong reputation for building backcountry dream machines, and the HyperCharger is their best effort yet. What stands out in the touring world is its natural feel and performance—unlike many skis that lose a little personality and fun as they drop weight, the HyperCharger turns, pops, and carves at a high level. With mild rocker at the tip and camber underfoot the 106-millimeter waist, the HyperCharger is a true all-rounder. And at $795, it’s a good deal among comparable backcountry skis.
What’s keeping the HyperCharger off the top of our podium? For one, the Voilé has a little more hard-snow bias than its width implies, and the ski isn’t as effortless in powder as DPS models. The flat tails can sometimes catch in deeper snow—something that’s not as much of an issue with the rockered tails on the Pagoda Tour above—and it’s a little less predictable in crud, too. But we have to come back to value: for under $800, you get a strong and thoroughly enjoyable backcountry ski with few downsides. It’s worth noting that Voilé also offers the SuperCharger, which has the same dimensions as the HyperCharger but uses less carbon and an aspen core for more weight (7 lbs. 3 oz.) and less cost ($695).
See the Voilé HyperCharger See the Women's Voilé HyperCharger
Weight: 7 lbs. 0 oz.
What we like: Lightweight but likes to charge.
What we don’t: Durability concerns with the thin build; so-so performance in crud.
Starting with the discontinued Katana, the backcountry-specific offerings from Volkl have pushed the boundaries on weight and downhill performance. And just looking at the 2021 Mantra V-Werks gives you an appreciation for the development process: the top of the ski is multi-layered with a raised spine of wood running down the center and covered in gorgeous carbon fiber. But don’t let its super thin edges deceive you: this is a serious, big-mountain charger. The Mantra’s strong construction and mixed rocker/camber design floats, slashes, and moves with ease through everything from powder to technical terrain.
Similar to the DPS Pagoda Tour above, the high-end Volkl is best in challenging backcountry conditions. The light front end can get knocked around through crud, although it does manage to outperform expectations on hardpack and at the resort. Another area of concern is long-term durability with such a unique topsheet and thin edges. But take care of this ski—and leave it behind on those questionable early-season days—and you’ll likely find little to dislike about the Mantra V-Werks.
See the Volkl Mantra V-Werks
Weight: 7 lbs. 3 oz.
Widths: 101, 111mm
What we like: Skis powder, bumps, and steeps well.
What we don’t: Doesn’t grip as solidly as other skis in icy conditions.
Icelantic has been on a nice run of late, and we particularly like their Natural 101 (and women’s Mystic 97) for season-long backcountry use. Its versatility is what makes it special: the Natural floats extremely well for its width, is pretty easy to manage in tight and steep spaces, and soaks up bumps very nicely. It even crosses over reasonably well to the resort, although we give the narrower Armada Tracer 98 above the edge in that respect. But with a three-year warranty and a competitive price of $779, the Natural 101 adds up to a very impressive touring design.
The ski is built to handle everything from mid-season blower pow to spring corn, but it does struggle some in icy conditions. Alternatives like the Voilé HyperCharger above offer more grip while undercutting the Natural in weight. At around 7 pounds for the pair, it’s not excessively heavy, but there are plenty of lighter competitors on the market. The upside to the Icelantic’s solid build—and arguably the brand’s strongest attribute along with its warranty—is that the Natural should hold up well to extended use.
See the Icelantic Natural 101 See the Women's Icelantic Mystic 97
Weight: 8 lbs. 0 oz.
Widths: 100, 112mm
What we like: Strong but reasonably light; amazing in powder.
What we don’t: Heavy and very pricey.
Some may feel that DPS gets a little too much attention in the backcountry ski world, but premium builds like the Pagoda Tour above and Alchemist set them apart. The Alchemist is DPS’s current range-topping construction type, taking the old Pure3 and tweaking the carbon compound for better top-end performance and stability. Importantly, the ski retains the lauded 112-millimeter-wide Wailer shape and snappy 15-meter radius that turns and powers through just about anything. For discerning backcountry skiers in areas that see consistently good powder and want a smooth and very capable driver, the Wailer 112 A112 RP is a class above in terms of refinement and all-around abilities.
We’ve covered the high price of admission with the Pagoda above, and it’s the same story with the Wailer A112. Frequent and discerning skiers likely will find the investment worth it, while those who are a bit more casual should look elsewhere. And a complaint specific to the Wailer is its relatively hefty 8-pound weight. For reference, the wider Moment Wildcat above gets you an additional 4 millimeters in waist width while undercutting the DPS by an ounce. But the smooth power transmission and high-end capabilities across a range of conditions make it a fair tradeoff in speed on the uphill.
See the DPS Wailer A112 RP See the Women's DPS Yvette A112 RP
Weight: 6 lbs. 11 oz.
Widths: 88, 95, 105mm
What we like: Very durable build at an attractive price.
What we don’t: On the heavy side for a touring ski and a bit rough on choppy snow.
Taking the place of the Route in Black Diamond’s lineup, the Helio Recon offers a more affordable alternative to the brand’s popular Helio series. The big point of differentiation is the core, with the Recon swapping the Helio’s carbon fiber for wood and fiberglass. The downside to the change is about a half pound of extra weight, but the Recon 95 still is plenty light for long tours at under 7 pounds for the pair. Plus, the wood core gives it a damp feel and a versatile ride that’s quite comfortable when mixing in the occasional day at the resort. Competitively priced at $650—a cool $200 less than the Helio 95—there’s a lot to like about the Recon.
In addition to being a little heavy for a 95-millimeter backcountry design, the BD Recon does have a relatively soft flex, which favors less aggressive skiers. Hard chargers and those wanting maximum downhill performance likely will want to stick with the Helio or an option like the Volkl Mantra V-Werks above. In addition, it’s a bit rough in choppy snow and can get pushed around more than we’d like. But overall, the Recon is a solid all-rounder that has a lot of appeal for those just getting into the sport.
See the Black Diamond Helio Recon 95
Weight: 6 lbs. 13 oz.
Widths: 65, 77, 87, 93, 103mm
What we like: Kastle’s renowned downhill capabilities in a trimmed-down build.
What we don’t: Can be hard to find online; not a weight or price leader.
Kastle has a loyal following among expert skiers of all disciplines, and their alpine touring collection is the impressive TX line. Available in widths ranging from 65 millimeters for skimo racers up to the 103-millimeter model here, the design is well-respected for its downhill performance in nearly all conditions. A key ingredient is the unique Hollowtech tip, which strips away a significant amount of the material at the front of the ski to reduce weight while retaining good stability and dampening properties. Combined with Kastle’s typical attention to detail and premium materials—highlighted by a carbon and fiberglass layer that sits above the wood core—and you get a ski that excels in everything from open bowls to steep chutes.
Two consistent challenges with Kastle skis are their steep price tags and availability in the U.S. While the TX103 does undercut alternatives like the DPS Pagoda Tour above, it’s still among the priciest on the market at nearly $1,000 (the MSRP is the same for the narrower options). And unfortunately, the skis can be hard to track down online, especially as you get further into the ski season. Finally, at nearly 7 pounds for the pair, the TX103 isn’t best-in-class in terms of weight. That said, it’s still pretty reasonable for all but the longest days, and we suspect downhill-focused riders will find the tradeoff to be well worth it.
See the Kastle TX103
Weight: 7 lbs. 1 oz.
Widths: 98, 108, 118mm
What we like: Playful, freestyle-oriented backcountry option.
What we don’t: Not very planted at speed.
True to the brand’s freestyle roots, the Line Vision is quick, playful, and downright fun in soft snow (especially in its wider 108- and 118-millimeter shapes). Backcountry skis often trade some personality for weight savings, but Line’s touring collection is a rare exception. The Paulownia and maple wood core give it excellent pop, and a creative mix of carbon and aramid fibers (also known as Kevlar) allows the ski to float nicely atop powder or in midair off a natural feature. For playful backcountry skiers, the Vision is an intriguing option.
What you give up with the Line’s forgivable nature is stability at speed. The fairly soft front end and decently aggressive rocker profile aren’t very happy busting through crusty snow or skating on ice. As such, skiers who plan on tackling ambitious lines or dabbling in pucker-worthy terrain may want to steer clear (the Black Crows Navis Freebird above is far superior in these situations). But if an easy-to-drive ski that puts a smile on your face is the goal, look no further than the Line Vision.
See the Line Vision 108
Weight: 7 lbs. 11 oz.
Widths: 98, 108mm
What we like: Impressive weight savings compared to the old Chugach.
What we don’t: Still heavy for long tours.
The original Dynafit Chugach made a big splash in the backcountry market when it was released a few years ago. Here was a ski that was set up for touring, but kept some of the heft, and a lot of the stability and trustworthiness, of a big-mountain rig. The replacement model follows the trend for lighter weight—at a very solid 1-pound savings—without giving up too much in terms of downhill strength. With the same basic shape and rockered design as the old Chugach, the Beast 108 deserves a look.
Cutting weight will inevitably change the personality of a ski, and for those that liked the bulletproof Chugach, the Beast 108 may fall short. But it’s important to note that the 108 still is a substantial ski—for perspective, it weighs around 1 pound 4 ounces more than the DPS Pagoda Tour above. As such, the DPS and others are the preferred option for long tours or mountaineering, but if you need a solid partner for a sketchy descent, it may be worth hauling the extra poundage.
See the Dynafit Beast 108
Weight: 5 lbs. 15 oz.
Widths: 85, 95, 100, 106mm
What we like: Exceptionally lightweight for the width and performance.
What we don’t: Weight compromises dampness.
In sharp contrast to the Dynafit Beast 108 above, Movement’s Alp Tracks puts a premium on weight savings for moving fast in the mountains. At under 6 pounds for the 106-millimeter-wide model (narrower and even lighter versions are available), it’s built for quick ascents, multi-day efforts, and extended hut trips where ounces really matter. The craftmanship from the Swiss brand also is undeniable, with a high-end carbon construction and very clean styling (the carbon fiber laminate is on full display), but the price is equally steep at $1,125. Clearly this is a specialized tool, but the Alp Tracks offers a very appealing combination of weight, width, and a hand-built feel.
Coming in about 11 ounces lighter than our top-rated Zero G above (which isn’t a heavyweight by any means), it’s unsurprising that the Alp Tracks suffers in chunky and icy conditions. Cutting that much weight means the ski will get kicked around and won’t be as easy to rely on at high speed. On the other hand, the weight pays dividends in maneuverability, and its shape excels on both the up and downhill in soft snow. And lest we forget, that carbon fiber weave delivers a lot of pop and energy for connecting turns in dreamy conditions. For those in the market for an ultralight powder machine, the Alp Tracks is certainly a worthy choice.
See the Movement Alp Tracks 106
Weight: 7 lbs. 10 oz.
Widths: 94, 106mm
What we like: Great price for a mixed resort and backcountry design.
What we don’t: Can be chattery and hard to control in firm snow.
An all-new design for 2021, Volkl’s Blaze targets the growing market of 50/50 resort and backcountry skis. It’s tailormade for throwing on a pair of Salomon Shift or Marker Kingpin bindings: the ski is a natural in soft snow with a very smooth flex and easy-to-manage turn radius, and Volkl did a nice job keeping things light with a simple wood construction. But perhaps the most impressive feature is the price: at $600, it’s the most affordable powder-ready ski on this list.
What keeps the Volkl Blaze from taking our top crossover backcountry/resort spot? The primary issue is confidence in firm snow conditions, where we found it to be fairly difficult to control. There was a decent amount of tip flap at speed, and the ski felt chattery and was hard to smoothly turn and stop on icy hardpack. We suspect adding a layer of carbon would go a long way in improving stiffness and all-around performance, but it would impact the Blaze’s flickable feel as well as hurting its value. These complaints push the Blaze down our list, but it’s still a quality ski, and especially in regions that have consistently good snow... Read in-depth review
See the Volkl Blaze 106 See the Women's Volkl Blaze 106
Weight: 6 lbs. 3 oz.
Widths: 85, 95mm
What we like: Impressive stability for the weight.
What we don’t: Not a great value; makes you work in powder.
Salomon’s MTN Explore 95 is another solid ski that aims to balance uphill and downhill performance. We like the ingredients: 95-millimeter waist, semi-stiff construction, and weight-saving measures like Koroyd in the tip of the ski to reduce chatter. On the slopes, it’s a nimble carver on firm snow and can dance in the trees but doesn’t get too out of sorts at speed, even with a decently strong driver aboard (it matches well with intermediates). Some may prefer more inspiring graphics, but we like the clean look of the blue and red topsheet.
You do pay a small weight penalty for the extra downhill stability of the MTN Explore 95, as many skis in its class come in under 6 pounds. But its weight is nothing to scoff at, and the majority of backcountry skiers will admit 5 or so extra ounces split between skis isn’t a major downside. It’s also notable that the 95-millimeter width is as wide as the MTN Explore line goes, so deep powder seekers will need to look elsewhere (K2’s Wayback 106 and Black Diamond’s Helio Recon 105 come to mind).
See the Salomon MTN Explore 95
Weight: 5 lbs. 5 oz.
Widths: 84, 94mm
What we like: Superlight and nimble feel.
What we don’t: Not as stable as the BD Helio Carbon above.
Like Black Diamond’s Helio Carbon above, the Elan Ibex 84 Carbon XLT is an ultralight design built for long tours and spring snow conditions. The Ibex’s calling card is weight: at 5 pounds 5 ounces for the pair, it’s the lightest backcountry ski on our list this season. But we appreciate that it isn’t a dedicated skimo design: the planks have a fairly natural feel and reasonably soft flex that is easy to control in tight spots. Clearly the 84-millimeter width isn’t made for soft snow (even the wider Ibex 94 doesn’t provide great float), but the Ibex is a good partner for ultralight trips and ski mountaineering.
Where does the Elan Ibex Carbon fall short? Aggressive pilots looking for a narrow ski likely will prefer the Black Diamond Helio Carbon line, which offers better performance on the downhill. In particular, the BD’s stiffer build is more stable at speed and through variable snow. But the Elan has the edge in terms of weight and is nimbler in general underfoot. If shaving ounces is your main goal, the Ibex in a short length is hard to beat, but we still prefer the more versatile Helio in the end.
See the Elan Ibex 84 Carbon XLT
Weight: 9 lbs. 1 oz.
Widths: 95, 107, 117mm
What we like: Good price for deep powder performance.
What we don’t: Too flexy for aggressive skiers.
For a super wide powder ski at a darn good price, check out the Atomic Backland 117. With plenty of rocker at the tip, this ski is thoroughly capable for those days with snow dumps measured in feet, but surprisingly buttoned down with camber underfoot and a light rocker in the tail. It’s a far cry from the all-rounders at the top of our list, but the Backland 117 is just too much fun not to make an appearance here.
The Atomic Backland is well-built and holds its own at speed, but those hitting big-time lines may want a little more ski. It’s fairly soft for this segment and won’t react as well to inputs from hard-charging riders. On the other hand, it’s friendly and playful for floating a wide and open bowl. This middle ground certainly has an appeal for freeride powder touring (and deep days at the resort), but the DPS Lotus 124 below is worth the splurge for Alaska-level terrain.
See the Atomic Backland 117
Weight: 7 lbs. 1 oz.
Widths: 93, 99, 105, 117mm
What we like: Lightweight all-mountain build that’s ready to tour.
What we don’t: Requires a strong and capable pilot; not for untracked powder.
Head’s Kore all-mountain ski took the market by storm a few years ago with its stiff yet superlight construction. And it’s this focus on weight-cutting that puts the Kore on the backcountry ski map. Head uses a creative mix of light and strong materials—specifically Graphene, Koroyd, and carbon fiber—along with a poppy wood core to deliver powerful but quick-reacting performance. And at a modest 93-inch waist, the Kore can pull double duty on non-powder backcountry days as well as all season long at the resort.
The Kore undoubtedly is a fantastic all-mountain build and isn’t out-of-place on a skin track, but there are better touring-specific options out there. The ski is too stiff and a little narrow for real powder, and it isn’t as fun to drive as a result. In addition, its 16.4-meter turn radius makes it great in tight spots, but it isn’t as adept at big sweeping turns in the soft stuff. Stepping up to the Kore 99 would help in some ways, but the ski’s very sturdy build limits its appeal to expert or pro riders.
See the Head Kore 93
Weight: 8 lbs. 10 oz.
What we like: Powder dreaming.
What we don’t: Way too wide for most skiers and conditions.
We debated adding the Lotus 124 to this group with the fantastic Wailer line already represented above, but this model is too good to leave off. To be clear, this is an inherently limited ski, and we certainly hope that it isn’t a top consideration unless your uphill work often comes with some assistance from a helicopter. But for the kind of powder that makes it worth hauling 124-millimeter-wide sticks (think big lines in places like Alaska and British Columbia), the Lotus won’t let you down once gravity takes over.
What the Alchemist 124 stands for is the ultimate expression of DPS’s soft-snow heritage. Simply put, the ski is a dreamboat slicing through deep powder. And equipped with an innovative carbon and foam construction, it will remain composed at highlight-worthy speeds. With a long turn radius of 23 meters and massive 151-millimeter-wide shovel, the ski is not meant for navigating anything tight, but the full rocker profile, surprisingly reasonable sub-9-pound weight, and damp set-up make it fairly easy to control despite the large dimensions. For the select few powder hounds who need a ski of this caliber, we can’t think of a better option than the Lotus 124.
See the DPS Alchemist Lotus 124
|Blizzard Zero G 105||$800||133-105-119mm||6 lbs. 10 oz.||85, 95, 105mm||23m|
|DPS Skis Pagoda Tour 106 C2||$1,299||137-106-122mm||6 lbs. 7 oz.||94, 106mm||19m|
|Black Diamond Helio Carbon 88||$800||120-88-111mm||5 lbs. 11 oz.||88, 95, 104, 115mm||18m|
|Moment Wildcat Tour||$779||141-116-131mm||7 lbs. 15 oz.||116mm||25m|
|Armada Tracer 98||$700||132-98-123mm||6 lbs. 12 oz.||98, 108, 118mm||18m|
|Black Crows Navis Freebird||$830||138-102-119mm||7 lbs. 8 oz.||102mm||19m|
|K2 Wayback 96||$700||128-96-115mm||6 lbs. 3 oz.||80, 84, 88, 96, 106mm||22m|
|Voilé HyperCharger||$795||140-106-124mm||6 lbs. 3 oz.||106mm||19.5m|
|Volkl Mantra V-Werks||$1,150||135-99-117mm||7 lbs. 0 oz.||99mm||20.8m|
|Icelantic Natural 101||$779||132-101-117mm||7 lbs. 3 oz.||101, 111mm||21m|
|DPS Skis Wailer A112 RP||$1,299||140-112-127mm||8 lbs. 0 oz.||100, 112mm||15m|
|Black Diamond Helio Recon 95||$650||125-95-113mm||6 lbs. 11 oz.||88, 95, 105mm||19m|
|Kastle TX103||$949||138-103-120mm||6 lbs. 13 oz.||65, 77, 87, 93, 103mm||19m|
|Line Vision 108||$750||142-108-128mm||7 lbs. 1 oz.||98, 108, 118mm||19.5m|
|Dynafit Beast 108||$700||136-108-126mm||7 lbs. 11 oz.||98, 108mm||24m|
|Movement Alp Tracks 106||$1,125||138-106-126mm||5 lbs. 15 oz.||85, 95, 100, 106mm||20m|
|Volkl Blaze 106||$600||146-106-128mm||7 lbs. 10 oz.||94, 106mm||28/17/36m|
|Salomon MTN Explore 95||$850||130-95-116mm||6 lbs. 3 oz.||85, 95mm||18m|
|Elan Ibex 84 Carbon XLT||$750||120-84-105mm||5 lbs. 5 oz.||84, 94mm||19m|
|Atomic Backland 117||$800||140.5-117-129.5mm||9 lbs. 1 oz.||95, 107, 117mm||19m|
|Head Kore 93||$649||133-93-115mm||7 lbs. 1 oz.||93, 99, 105, 117mm||16.4m|
|DPS Skis Alchemist Lotus 124||$1,299||151-124-134mm||8 lbs. 10 oz.||124mm||23m|
- What Are Backcountry Skis?
- Uphill vs. Downhill Performance
- Ski Waist Width
- Ski Profile: Rocker and Camber
- Ski Shape: Sidecut and Turn Radius
- Core Materials
- Skins and Skin Compatibility
- Choosing Backcountry Ski Boots
- Choosing Ski Bindings
- Backcountry Ski Advice for Beginners
For those who want to explore beyond the crowds and lift-served terrain, backcountry skis (also referred to as alpine touring skis) are the ticket. Designed to skin uphill efficiently and handle variable downhill conditions, there are a wide range of alpine touring ski options for everything from deep powder to springtime corn. But their defining feature—and what differentiates them from inbound skis—is a shared emphasis on trimming weight. This focus does make them less powerful and often less durable than a pure downhill ski, but the tradeoff is worth it for covering ground in the backcountry.
It’s equally important to understand that not all capable backcountry skis are specifically referred to as such. From our list above, the Armada Tracer 98, Volkl Blaze 106, and Head Kore 93 are considered all-mountain or freeride designs. But their reasonable weight and prowess in most conditions makes them completely viable as crossover options. There often are a few extra considerations for making the conversion to backcountry use—including choosing a universal-style skin and touring binding—but it’s a good idea not to limit your search only to skis that have been defined as “touring-specific.” And if you’ll be splitting time between the resort and backcountry, a lightweight all-mountain ski is a great answer.
This is perhaps the trickiest factor in selecting a backcountry ski: choosing between saving energy on the uphill and maximizing downhill stability and performance. Logically, trimming weight by choosing a narrow and thin ski to make life easier on the skin track decreases comfort and power on the descent, so it’s good to start by defining your priorities and your preferred style of touring. Are you looking for short uphills for rowdy freeride descents in powder? Go with a substantial downhiller like the Dynafit Beast or Moment Wildcat Tour. Or will you be doing long traverses or mountaineering? Then put weight above all else with the Black Diamond Helio Carbon 88 or a similar ski. The good news is that there are an increasing number of options that strike a good 50/50 balance, including DPS’s Pagoda Tour collection, Black Crows’ Freebird line, and Icelantic's Natural.
85mm to 100mm
Unless you’re doing summer ski mountaineering or logging miles of approach in the backcountry, 85 millimeters should be just about the narrowest and lightest backcountry ski you need. With improved rocker designs in recent years, narrower skis in this width range achieve reasonable float in variable conditions while maintaining snappy edge-to-edge movement. The smaller size and weight also make them ideal for technical mountaineering, as we see in Elan's Ibex Carbon XLT skis, which include waist widths of 84 and 94 millimeters. For the budget conscious, the K2 Wayback 88 is a great option in this range as well.
100mm to 110mm
Skis with a waist width between 100 and 110 millimeters are what we consider to be “quiver killers.” In other words, if you’re going to buy one pair of backcountry skis and live in an area with decent snow, these are it. More and more companies are releasing skis that hover around the 105-millimeter mark, many with impressive versatility both out of bounds and at the resort. While not specifically designed for backcountry skiing, one nice hybrid option to consider is the new Volkl Blaze (106mm wide). Skis of this waist width are narrow enough for spring touring but really shine in the winter months when there is potential for deeper conditions.
These skis are made to shred serous pow. In most cases, they are specialized for deep snow with exceptional float. On the downside, this also means more weight and just more ski to manage. However, “fat” alpine touring skis like the Moment Wildcat Tour and the Atomic Backland 117 are incredibly fun on the downhill and will cater to those who live for days of cold smoke. Only buy a backcountry ski of 115mm+ if you plan on skiing regularly in deep conditions or Alaska-type lines that require a big, powerful ski like the DPS Skis Alchemist Lotus 124.
One thing on the mind of most backcountry skiers is the weight of their set-up. And as you can see in the comparison chart above, ski weights can vary quite a bit, from the ultralight Elan Ibex 84 Carbon XLT (5 lbs. 5 oz.) to the burly Atomic Backland 117 (9 lbs. 1 oz.). All-rounder backcountry skis like the Armada Tracer (6 lbs. 12 oz.) land in between these extremes.
Materials and construction are notable factors in the weight of a ski. Skis built with carbon fiber will be lighter than their fiberglass counterparts. Further, different types of wood cores yield differences in weight (see the section below on “Core Materials” for more information on this topic). Some manufacturers cut back on the sheer amount of material, eliminating metal edges on parts of the ski that rarely engage the snow. This technique, in addition to honeycomb-like cutouts, reduces swing weight in the tip and tail of the ski (found in Rossignol and Salomon skis, for example). Head’s Kore 93 is bereft of a topsheet and has a mixed Graphene, Koroyd, and carbon construction, making for a remarkably light ski.
Weight also is tied directly to a ski’s length and width. Obviously, shorter and narrower skis will have less material and therefore weigh less. But before you go real skinny and short, keep in mind the ideal length for your height, weight, and ability level, as well as the ideal waist width for your intended conditions. And as we covered in the section on Uphill vs. Downhill Performance above, your preferred style of touring will push you to a ski that is light, heavy, or somewhere in the middle.
Rocker and camber are design techniques that apply to the curvature of the ski. Camber is the traditional profile that makes the ski convex in relation to the snow, with direct contact points spread widely near the tip and tail. Rocker is a more modern technique that looks akin to the bottom of a boat with early rise in the tip and/or tail—picture a banana. Most backcountry skis on the market today have a combination of rocker and camber in their profile, with camber underfoot and rocker in the tip and sometimes the tail.
Camber and rocker affect a ski’s performance greatly. More camber underfoot helps with edge control in steep terrain and can increase stability at higher speeds. Rocker in the tip increases float and the ski’s ability to power through crud and variable conditions. A little rocker in the tail can be helpful when navigating technical sections, allowing the ski to ride backwards without difficulty and reducing the risk of catching an edge. Unless you are planning on switch landings in powder, a flat or semi-flat tailed ski will work well in the backcountry.
When looking at ski profiles, remember that when skinning up, the surface area of the ski contacting the snow directly affects the amount of uphill traction. As a result, a heavily rockered ski can limit your contact points and make climbing more of a chore. Some of the strongest climbers, like the Salomon MTN Explore, have a mild rocker/camber/flat design for excellent grip without giving up much in terms of downhill performance.
Let’s keep this one simple: the sidecut profile of a ski affects how large or small of a turn a ski will naturally make. Most backcountry skis are loosely based on a traditional sidecut. This means the ski gets narrower as you move from tip to waist and then wider again from waist to tail. The more concave the sidecut is, the shorter the turn radius (listed in meters). Skis with short turn radii of less than 17 meters often are less stable when straight lining at speed but have greater agility in technical terrain (one exception is the balanced Wailer A112 that has a 15m radius). On the flipside, a ski with a wide turn radius will be comfortable with smooth arching turns but may be reluctant to dance quickly in the trees. Personal preferences on skiing style and conditions will lead you in one direction or the other, but the majority of our favorite alpine touring skis above have a turn radius of 18 to 22 meters.
While experimental construction with carbon fiber and other lightweight materials are prevalent among current backcountry skis, wood cores remain the standard due to their unmatched feel and predictable rebound. There has been a shift, however, to lightweight woods like balsa, paulownia, poplar, and ash from heavier and tougher woods like aspen and maple. To combat stiffness and durability problems from this change, the rest of the ski is often beefed up with carbon, Titanal, or a similarly light but strong material. At the high end of the market, you will find all-carbon cores (or a carbon compound) such as the innovative Alchemist construction from DPS Skis. The Wailer A112 RP does an admirable job emulating the feel of a wood core with fantastic stiffness for the weight.
Due to such variety in how skis perform, there is no longer a standard way to choose a ski length. In a pinch, however, here is a general rule of thumb to get you started: your ski should be within 5-10 centimeters of your height. Less experienced and less aggressive skiers will be happiest with a slightly shorter ski. This decrease in length will make the ski stable at low speed, more manageable, and nimbler. Strong skiers with tendencies to go hard and fast will want a little more length for high-speed stability and to avoid overpowering their gear. As mentioned above, a shorter ski in the backcountry will have less ascending weight but decreased ability descending in the hands of expert-level skiers. And a final note on sizing: you can get away with a little longer ski that has more tip rocker, since there is less of the ski's surface area actually hitting the snow.
Climbing skins are what allow backcountry skiers to climb in mountainous terrain. These devices attach to the ski by way of tip and tail clips and skin glue, which adheres temporarily to the base. The side that is in contact with the snow is similar to animal fur, hence the term “skins.” When attached, the skin keeps you from sliding back on the uphill while "gliding" on flat or quick downhill sections.
With the exception of plastic skins made by Fischer, most skins are constructed with mohair, nylon, or a mohair-nylon hybrid. Generally, nylon skins provide greater uphill grip but less forward glide than mohair. If you’re new to backcountry skiing, a nylon skin is a great option to start with, while more experienced backcountry skiers would be better off with a hybrid or mohair skin. These options provide greater glide and efficiency over long distances. Many mountain professionals choose skins based on personal preference or brand loyalty, but you can’t really go wrong with a Black Diamond or G3 skin, as long as it has the right material type for you.
In terms of sizing, skins are typically sold either by width (Black Diamond) or length and width (G3 and Pomoca). For selecting the correct width, you’ll want to know the widest point on your skis, which is typically at the shovel. Then choose a skin width that is a few millimeters narrower (for example, choose a 110-millimeter skin if your ski is 113 millimeters wide). And if you choose a G3 or Pomoca skin, you’ll also need to select the length range that matches your skis. Once you have the sizing dialed in, the final step is to trim the skins to fit the sidecut of the ski, leaving the metal edge exposed (and in the case of the BD skins, trim the length as well).
To keep things simple, some ski companies like Black Crows offer pre-cut skins to match their skis, meaning that the skin fits the shape of your ski perfectly right out of the box. While this is convenient, be sure to investigate what kind of skin the company is providing before purchasing. Black Crows Pellis skins and designs from La Sportiva and Dynafit are solid performers, but if the quality is in doubt, it might be worth purchasing a trim-to-fit model from Black Diamond or G3.
Boots arguably are the most important piece of ski equipment. Similarly to skis, touring boots can be categorized by their strengths and weaknesses. Boots with better downhill ability tend to be heavier and have a less-sufficient walk mode for the climb up. Lighter boots with a greater range of motion in walk mode will provide less control and comfort on the descent.
Right off the bat, it’s best to establish whether you want a lightweight-oriented boot, a downhill-oriented boot, or something in the middle. For the greatest level of control, make sure your boots are powerful enough for your ski of choice. A flimsy boot paired with a stiff, burly ski wastes its performance potential. A really nice backcountry-specific boot that provides solid power transmission is the Scarpa Maestrale RS, the unspoken standard of the alpine touring community. They also are warm and should be very comfortable provided they are fitted correctly. And we cannot stress this enough: the most important aspect of your boots is fit. An extremely well equipped boot that’s not fitted correctly for your foot is going to perform worse than a lesser boot that fits extremely well.
With a few exceptions, there are two basic categories of backcountry skiing bindings: frame bindings and tech bindings (also known as pin bindings). Essentially, a frame binding is a traditional alpine binding mounted on a rail that releases at the heel for skinning. Frame bindings are heavier, less efficient for climbing, and can be cumbersome. However they offer arguably better downhill performance and are a good option for people who mainly ski the resort but get out of bounds on occasion. Atomic, Marker, and Tyrolia offer some great frame bindings if this type of skiing suits you.
Tech bindings are far superior in terms of backcountry efficiency due to their lighter weight, and have improved significantly in the past few years. Options like the G3 Ion are increasingly user-friendly and reliable while saving 2 or more pounds for the pair compared to a frame binding. We cannot recommend tech bindings for heavy inbounds skiing, however, as the metal-on-metal contact wears down on firmer resort conditions, resulting in a short lifespan (Salomon's S/Lab Shift binding is one exception). Further, the release values are often not as accurate as true alpine bindings, which creates a big risk when skiing at higher speeds and on hardpack snow. But for regular backcountry use, tech bindings are a worthwhile investment, providing efficient skinning and fairly reliable downhill performance in variable conditions. For a deeper dive into this topic, see our article on tech bindings vs. frame bindings.
For the no-compromise big mountain skier, check out CAST Touring. This solution essentially is a modified Look Pivot alpine binding with a toe piece that can be interchanged with a tech toe. While transitions with this system are a little more difficult and they’re certainly not cheap, the downhill performance and reliability are fantastic.
For resort skiers looking to explore out of bounds and get some exercise, welcome to the family. Backcountry skiing may seem intimidating and expensive, but it doesn’t have to be. Don’t let anyone tell you any differently.
First off, get educated. We strongly recommend rewarding yourself with some backcountry skiing equipment only after signing up for an avalanche education course. Check out AIARE, read Snow Sense, and sign up for a class. Money is better spent on education than equipment. Not only will a course provide potentially life-saving and highly useful information, but also a chance to get familiar with your gear (essentials include an avalanche beacon, probe, and shovel) in a safe and low-pressure environment. Now that you’ve done that, we can discuss the fun part: gear!
Starting with boots: if you absolutely love your current downhill boots, the cheapest option is to continue to use them in the backcountry. If they have a walk mode, that’s an added bonus. If new boots are within your budget, see a boot fitter who sells backcountry boots to ensure you’re in the right boot for your foot shape and size. Look for something that has well balanced uphill and downhill abilities, such as the Scarpa Maestrale.
Working our way down to bindings: if you know that you want to backcountry ski and are sure you’ll love it, consider a tech binding. Tech models offer excellent climbing efficiency, easy and smooth transitions, and are the lightest-weight designs. If you’re unsure about how much you will enjoy backcountry skiing, start with a frame binding. Designs like the Marker Baron are heavier but easy to learn to use, can be skied inbounds regularly, and often are hundreds of dollars cheaper than tech bindings. Sitting in between these categories is Salomon’s innovative Shift MNC, which has a toe piece that is compatible with both tech and alpine/downhill boots. This gives you true all-in-on functionality for resort and backcountry use, with only compromises being weight (although it’s significantly lighter than frame bindings) and price at $550 for the 10-DIN model.
Finally, we have skis and skins. For the budget-conscious, a good first step is simply mounting frame bindings on your current resort skis, so long as they are not groomer-oriented. An all-mountain ski with a waist width of at least 90 millimeters should work just fine. If you have the money for another pair of skis, choose something that can ski the resort well too in case you don’t get out there as much as you’re thinking. In addition, a hybrid-style ski will be more comfortable for those used to resort models. Consider Armada's Tracer line if this type of ski suits you. Once you choose a ski, find skins that fit said ski so you can cruise uphill. We'd recommend nylon skins for those with little to no backcountry experience as they have greater uphill grip than other options.
A Note of Appreciation for Cottage Ski Brands
The beauty of the backcountry ski industry as it currently stands is that small ski companies still have a legitimate shot at building a loyal fan base. The sport is somewhat young—particularly within the mainstream—and a good number of skiers are willing to pay premium dollars for premium products. As such, there is a cottage industry of sorts within the backcountry ski world of smaller companies building skis that excel in their local environment (plus, many of the ski brands listed above are somewhat young). A few examples include Prior Manufacturing out of Whistler, BC, Wagner Custom Skis from Telluride, Colorado, and Praxis Skis on the North Shore of Lake Tahoe. Many of these brands offer varying degrees of customization for anything from the topsheet design to the construction of the core. For the discerning backcountry skier, that can be a pretty enticing option.
Back to Our Top Backcountry Ski Picks Back to Our Backcountry Ski Comparison Table