Choosing the right ski jacket is all about managing the conditions that you might encounter on the mountain. This depends on the specific kinds of skiing you enjoy most—skinning up a sunny ridgeline in the North Cascades is far different than bracing against a Nor’easter on a lift in Maine. Some people prefer a shell for the versatility, and some prefer a bit of insulation to keep the cold at bay. Budget-seekers like the all-in-one functionality of a 3-in-1 jacket, which comes with a separate insulating layer that can be zipped into the shell. We’ve included all three in our picks for the best ski jackets of 2021 below. For further guidance, see our ski jacket comparison table and buying advice below the picks. And for more on outerwear, see our article on the best ski pants.
Insulated: No (thin flannel backer)
Best for: Resort and backcountry
What we like: Premium build quality, fit, and performance.
What we don’t: A bit heavy and bulky for serious backcountry use.
Arc’teryx dominates the high-end jacket market, and their men's Sabre (and women's Sentinel) is an all-time favorite shell for those who ski both the resort and backcountry. Lightly updated for last season, the AR (for “all round”) has a slightly longer and modernized fit, but the rest of the proven design remains the same. Its premium 3-layer Gore-Tex construction is burly and offers phenomenal weather protection, while a soft flannel backer adds a little extra warmth and comfort. Arc’teryx also nailed the features with easy-to-use pit zips, a highly adjustable and helmet-compatible hood, and five smartly designed pockets. All told, the Sabre AR is an extraordinarily well-rounded ski jacket that’s ready to handle anything from Arctic blasts of wind and snow on the lift to quick tours.
Where the Sabre AR comes up short is for extended backcountry use. At about 1.5 pounds, it’s fairly heavy and bulky to throw in a pack, and the liner inhibits breathability even with the pit zips opened up. Those who tour exclusively likely will want a more backcountry-specific piece like Arc’teryx’s Alpha SV or Outdoor Research’s Skyward II below, but you won’t find a better all-rounder than the Sabre. It delivers an unbeatable combination of comfort, build quality, weather resistance, and mobility. It’s worth noting that Arc’teryx also makes the trimmed-down men’s Sabre LT (and women’s Sentinel LT), which has a longer cut but saves a little weight by replacing the flannel backer with Gore’s smooth C-Knit lining... Read in-depth review
See the Men's Arc'teryx Sabre AR See the Women's Arc'teryx Sentinel AR
Best Resort Ski Jacket
Category: Hybrid hard/softshell
Insulated: Yes (80g PrimaLoft Black)
Best for: Resort
What we like: Stretchy shell fabric and great insulated design.
What we don't: Runs warm for active use.
Helly Hansen's Alpha 3.0 has all the features we look for in a capable resort-ready design. First, you get a moderate level of PrimaLoft Black insulation in the body and sleeves for a nice boost in warmth compared with a non-insulated hardshell. It’s enough to take the sting out of a chilly ride up the chairlift but won’t overwhelm you on the way down. Second, the jacket offers really nice movement with four-way stretch fabric and a no-nonsense athletic fit. Rather than incorporating a few stretch panels into the jacket, Helly Hansen uses the four-way design throughout. Finally, we love the styling of the Alpha 3.0, which is super clean, works well for people of all ages, and is offered in a variety of colorways.
What are the downsides of the Alpha 3.0? Breathability lags behind the backcountry-focused shells on this list as a result of the 2-layer build and emphasis on warmth (the pit zips do help, however). The jacket does have a snap-out powder skirt and Recco reflector, not to mention the stretch mentioned above, but it’s definitely most at home inside the ropes. Lastly, we like the price of the jacket for what you get. It’s less than half the cost of the Arc’teryx Macai below, for example, but still covers all the bases for resort skiers.
See the Men's Helly Hansen Alpha 3.0 See the Women's Helly Hansen Alphelia
Best Backcountry Ski Jacket
Category: Hybrid hard/softshell
Best for: Backcountry and resort
What we like: AscentShell delivers on its promises; full-length side/pit zip.
What we don’t: Lacks pit zips; a couple fit and finish issues.
In-house fabric technologies often fall short, but Outdoor Research’s AscentShell is an exception. The Skyward is the third model we’ve tested with AscentShell—the first two being the excellent Realm and follow-up Interstellar rain jackets—and it performed flawlessly through a full season of backcountry and occasional resort use. The fabric stretches like a softshell (it's even more flexible for the current model), is extremely breathable with an air-permeable design, and is fully waterproof. To top it off, the Skyward has plenty of interior and exterior pockets along with a unique side zip that opens poncho-like from the hem to bicep. You simply won’t find a better-tuned jacket for staying cool and comfortable on the mountain.
What are you giving up at the Skyward’s $350 price point? Build quality is a step down from the ridiculously high attention to detail that you get from the Arc’teryx Sabre above and Patagonia PowSlayer below, and the OR jacket has a couple small annoyances like the main zipper sometimes catching along the hem. In addition, the AscentShell fabric doesn’t have the batten-down-the-hatches feel of the Gore-Tex options, but it didn’t let us down even in high winds and heavy snow. All in all, the Skyward’s breathability, massive side vents, and feature set makes it an excellent all-in-one backcountry and on-piste shell... Read in-depth review
See the Men's Outdoor Research Skyward See the Women's Outdoor Research Skyward
Best 3-in-1 Ski Jacket
Insulated: Yes (PrimaLoft ThermoBall)
Best for: Resort
What we like: 3-in-1 versatility and quality ThermoBall insulation.
What we don’t: Heavy and bulky.
For those looking to save, turning to a 3-in-1 ski jacket can be a good option. With a single purchase, you get both a waterproof shell and an insulating midlayer that can be either zipped in on cold days or left at home in spring conditions (you can even wear the insulated jacket on its own around town). Many 3-in-1s are of the budget variety, but we think upgrading to the $349 The North Face ThermoBall Eco Snow is worth the investment. The jacket has a nice fit, offers decent exterior storage, and includes upgrades like pit zips and exposed, water-resistant zippers. Its standout feature, however, is the ThermoBall zip-out jacket, which we've found does a pretty good impression of a lofty down piece—all while continuing to insulate when wet.
If you’re set on the 3-in-1 design, the ThermoBall Snow Triclimate is our favorite option on the market, but we typically prefer the versatility of separating our jackets and midlayers. The extra zippers and heft that come with this kind of outer layer make them not as comfortable and they provide less freedom of movement. Further, 3-in-1s are more prone to feeling drafty, plus the connected midlayer limits access to your interior pockets. That said, the ThermoBall Snow Triclimate provides two well-built jackets with relatively few compromises, making it a solid value for resort skiers.
See the Men's TNF ThermoBall Triclimate See the Women's TNF ThermoBall Triclimate
Best Budget Ski Jacket
Insulated: Yes (100g synthetic)
Best for: Resort
What we like: A solid value in a resort jacket and with plenty of features.
What we don’t: Relatively cheap materials and no pit zips.
Ski jackets can get very expensive—the Arc’teryx Macai below is pushing $1,000, for example—but that doesn’t mean you need to spend big to get a quality product. For resort skiers looking for a warm and well-built jacket, the Columbia Last Tracks is a nice choice. For just $175, you get a waterproof build with 80-gram synthetic insulation, an Omni-Heat reflective liner on the inside, and useful features like a removable storm hood and powder skirt. We even like the sleek design and relative lack of bulk, which isn’t always the case with Columbia gear and means that the Last Tracks can be worn both for skiing and everyday winter use.
What are the shortcomings of the Columbia Last Tracks? Unlike a shell jacket or 3-in-1, the built-in insulation means that you don’t have the option of stripping down for spring skiing and warmer days (and it’s worth noting that it lacks pit zips). And with any jacket at this price point, Columbia’s proprietary waterproofing tech isn’t up to Gore-Tex standards, nor should you expect Patagonia or Arc’teryx build quality or comfort (the shell is on the stiff side, for example). That said, we can’t help but love the value here: the Last Tracks is everything most people need in a resort jacket and nothing they don’t.
See the Men's Columbia Last Tracks See the Women's Columbia Last Tracks
Best of the Rest
Insulated: Yes (80g & 40g synthetic)
Best for: Resort
What we like: A warm and comfortable resort jacket.
What we don’t: Less of a performance piece than the Alpha 3.0 above.
Patagonia’s PowSlayer below is a high-performance, premium option, but the brand’s entry-level men's Snowshot and women's Snowbelle have the most appeal for resort skiers. Offered in a range of styles—including an uninsulated shell and 3-in-1 jacket—we like the insulated model best: it’s quite warm with 80-gram synthetic in the body, and includes thoughtful touches like a drop-in interior pocket for goggles and a soft-touch taffeta lining. The in-house H2No waterproof membrane doesn’t offer much in terms of breathability, but the Snowshot’s pit zips help you regulate your temperature while lapping the resort.
As with most Patagonia products, even their budget-oriented Snowshot/Snowbelle is a significant investment at $329. That being said, the fit and finish is up to their typical standards, and they’ve incorporated recycled polyester in the shell and insulation. Compared with the Helly Hansen Alpha 3.0 above, the Patagonia lacks the stretchy, high-end feel, but it delivers a great mix of warmth, weather protection, and durability for $120 less. For a premium resort option from Patagonia, check out their Primo Puff ($799), which features a stretchy Gore-Tex construction and lofty PlumaFill synthetic insulation... Read in-depth review
See the Men's Patagonia Snowshot See the Women's Patagonia Snowbelle
Best for: Backcountry and resort
What we like: Top-end protection and durability for serious big-mountain riding.
What we don’t: No hand pockets and overkill for resort use.
Norrøna doesn’t have the name recognition of Arc’teryx, but they’re one of only a few brands that can come close in terms of attention to detail and outright performance. Their Lofoten Gore-Tex Pro Jacket is case in point: this beautifully crafted shell is built for deep days with Gore’s top-of-the-line laminate and an extended back length, includes a tall collar and helmet-friendly hood, and has a near-perfect combination of features and weight. There’s sufficient organization for storing backcountry essentials, and a large, mesh-backed zipper along the front allows you to regulate your temperature throughout the day (you also get extra-large pit zips for dumping heat). Tack on a reasonable 1-pound-8.6-ounce weight, cozy hand gaiters, and a range of fun color options, and you can see why the Lofoten is so beloved.
What are the downsides with the Norrøna’s top-end Gore-Tex Pro design? Price is the biggest obstacle, although at $699, the Lofoten is a fair deal when you consider that Arc’teryx’s $675 Sabre AR above uses a downgraded 3-layer construction. That said, the Sabre is more well-rounded with its flannel-backed interior that is less crinkly and more comfortable for everyday riding. In addition, the Lofoten fits on the small end (we went up a size and it worked great) and you miss out on hand pockets, which is an issue for resort use or times when you want protection from the biting cold. Overall, we give the nod to the Sabre for its do-everything nature, but the Lofoten is hard to beat in serious alpine conditions... Read in-depth review
See the Men's Norrøna Lofoten GTX Pro See the Women's Norrøna Lofoten GTX Pro
Category: Hybrid hard/softshell
Best for: Backcountry and resort
What we like: Softshell-like comfort and stretch in a protective, 3-layer design.
What we don’t: Lacks the bombproof feel of Gore-Tex-equipped hardshells.
A new entry for 2021, the men’s Flylow Malone and women’s Lucy jackets combine the best attributes of softshell and hardshell designs into a well-rounded package. For sidecountry hikes or quick backcountry tours, the stretchy construction and smooth interior offer standout comfort. If a storm rolls in, the 3-layer waterproof build does a good job blocking wind and snow, and the extended collar covers all but your nose when zipped up. We also think Flylow nailed the styling of both the Malone and Lucy—particularly in the tri-color patterns—and all of the materials impressed us from a quality standpoint.
Similar to Outdoor Research’s Skyward II above, the emphasis on comfort and stretch does impact the Flylow’s bombproof feel. Its DWR coating sheds snow effectively, but it’s not as well-equipped for particularly wet and nasty days (those in the Pacific Northwest who get out a lot likely will want more protection). We also were a little disappointed by the organization: the jacket lacks an internal dump pocket for storing goggles or climbing skins, and the chest pockets were too small to fit a large phone (in our case, an iPhone 11). Nitpicks aside, the new Flylow jacket hits a really nice middle ground of comfort and performance for mixed resort and backcountry use... Read in-depth review
See the Men's Flylow Gear Malone See the Women's Flylow Gear Lucy
Insulated: Yes (750-fill down; 60g and 100g synthetic)
Best for: Resort
What we like: The ultimate on-piste jacket for cold weather.
What we don't: Double-take-worthy price.
You can’t start a discussion about the Macai without first acknowledging its price: yes, this jacket really costs $999 (the women's Andessa is a little less at $949). What you get for that large sum of money is an absolutely glorious resort piece that is one of only a few jackets capable of pulling double duty for daily wear. The Macai is extremely warm, super comfortable, fits great, and has the first-rate build quality that Arc’teryx and very few other companies offer. For resort skiing and particularly in cold places, the Macai is the cream of the crop and should last you for many seasons to come.
Warmth and insulation come courtesy of Down Composite Mapping, a technique Arc’teryx also employs on their popular down jackets like the Cerium LT. Premium 750-fill goose down is distributed around the core and sleeves to keep weight and bulk to a minimum, with synthetic insulation in areas most prone to getting wet like the underarms, cuffs, and collar. The result is lofty warmth that can keep you comfortable in truly frigid conditions (for us, this included temperatures below zero when factoring in wind chill). It’ll run hot in mild weather, but if you’re the type that’s always cold on the slopes or want a premium ski jacket that wears well around town, there isn’t anything better than the Macai... Read in-depth review
See the Men's Arc'teryx Macai See the Women's Arc’teryx Andessa
Best for: Resort and backcountry
What we like: Great price for a quality 3-layer Gore-Tex shell.
What we don’t: Comfort and protection fall short of the Sabre AR.
Marmot is a stalwart in the waterproof shell market, consistently balancing build quality and value. Their ski line isn’t the most expansive—arguably rain jackets are their strongest suit—but there are a number of solid options, including the Spire. This jacket has a Gore-Tex construction (in the upgraded 3-layer form), and you get nice touches like a zip-out powder skirt and large, adjustable hood for both in-bounds and backcountry use. In addition, Marmot’s recent sustainability push means the shell utilizes recycled polyester and has a PFC-free DWR coating. Perhaps most impressive is its $435 MSRP—our top-rated Sabre AR above uses a similar Gore-Tex build yet costs $240 more.
With that great price do come a few downsides. For one, the Spire weighs about the same as Arc’teryx’s Sabre AR but doesn’t include the soft and comfortable flannel liner, plus you miss out on a water-resistant main zipper (the zipper is protected by a fabric flap, however). And in very wet and rowdy conditions, the Marmot’s shorter back length (it’s about 2 in. less than the Sabre) and slightly cheaper build don’t hold up as well. But these nitpicks do little to dampen our enthusiasm for this all-around excellent shell. And backed by Marmot’s first-rate warranty, the Spire adds up to a great long-term investment.
See the Men's Marmot Spire See the Women's Marmot Spire
Insulated: Yes (60g synthetic)
Best for: Resort
What we like: Cozy and comfortable with the stretchy build.
What we don’t: Pricier and not as warm as the Patagonia Snowshot above.
In only a few years, Black Diamond has gone from the launch of its ski apparel line to being a big-time player. Their current collection covers everything from backcountry-specific pieces to premium 3-layer Gore-Tex shells, but we like their mid-range BoundaryLine Insulated for its stretchy and comfortable design. We’ve been consistently impressed with the quality of their in-house BD.dry waterproof tech, and the added give in the fabric is a benefit for anything from buckling up boots to reaching for a pole plant. Its 60-gram synthetic insulation is on the light end of the spectrum, but it’s easy to add a layer underneath the BoundaryLine on cold days.
How does the BD BoundaryLine compare with Patagonia’s popular Snowshot above? Both are cozy resort options that fit and feel great, have large and easily adjustable hoods, and include important features like hand and chest pockets and pit zips. For an extra $20, the Black Diamond gets you a slightly better range of motion with its stretchier face fabric and lighter-weight build (it’s about 3 ounces less). On the other hand, the insulated Patagonia is warmer with 80-gram synthetic in the core and has a burlier shell. It’s a close call between the two, but we give the slight edge to the Patagonia for most resort skiers.
See the Men's BD BoundaryLine Insulated See the Women's BD BoundaryLine Insulated
Best for: Backcountry
What we like: Versatile and bomber shell with proven performance.
What we don’t: Huge price tag and missing some ski-specific features.
Arc’teryx’s Alpha SV hardshell isn’t designed exclusively for skiing, but it’s a very legitimate option nonetheless. It has everything we love and expect from an Arc’teryx jacket: it fits great, is bombproof with Gore's latest Pro membrane and 100-denier face fabric, and is one of the lightest models on this list at just over 1 pound (there’s a reason we’ve ranked it highly in our hardshell round-up for years). This do-everything jacket is fantastic for backcountry use but isn’t out of place on a resort day with its strong weather protection and layering-friendly, long cut.
What do you give up with a non-ski-specific shell like the Alpha SV? Most notably, you don’t get features like a powder skirt for deep snow days or hand pockets. If these are important to you, it’s worth checking out Arc’teryx’s Rush jacket. This premium shell also performs extremely well in brutal conditions with a mixed 80- and 100-denier Gore-Tex Pro build, but adds in items like hand pockets, a powder skirt that can connect to compatible Arc’teryx snow pants, and a slightly longer cut (by about 0.5 in.). Both are among the top jackets for serious alpine use, but they also come with steep price tags: $799 for the Alpha SV and $749 for the Rush... Read in-depth review
See the Men's Arc'teryx Alpha SV See the Women's Arc'teryx Alpha SV
Category: Hardshell w/ stretch panels
Best for: Backcountry and resort
What we like: Excellent mix of mobility, ventilation, and weather protection.
What we don’t: The hood barely fits over our ski helmet.
Outdoor Research is known for providing a lot of bang for your buck, but their Hemispheres line takes aim at the top end of the market. The big news with this jacket are the panels of Gore-Tex with Stretch Technology at the back of the shoulders, hood, and under the arms. This 2-layer design is a major step forward in terms of mobility while retaining complete wind and waterproofness. You also get premium features like Gore’s soft C-Knit backer along the interior and large TorsoFlo side vents that extend from the hem to the armpit for dumping heat quickly. All told, we’ve found the Hemispheres to be extremely comfortable for anything from long backcountry tours to stormy days lapping the resort.
What’s not to like about this OR jacket? To start, the hood of our size large barely squeezes over our Smith Quantum helmet. The stretchy fabric makes it bearable and the tall collar helps to provide full face and neck coverage, but we would prefer a more accommodating hood shape overall. Further, we haven’t loved the fit in general, which runs a little narrower in the shoulders and waist compared a jacket like the Arc’teryx Alpha SV above. But if the trim cut works for you, the Hemispheres is a standout with excellent range of motion and weather protection... Read in-depth review
See the Men's Outdoor Research Hemispheres See the Women's OR Hemispheres
Insulated: Yes (100 & 60g Thermogreen)
Best for: Resort
What we like: Warm, tough, and well-built.
What we don’t: Not a great value; boxy fit.
Patagonia’s mid-range Powder Bowl offers a step up in warmth and protection from the Snowshot above. With a mix of 100- and 60-gram synthetic, it has enough insulation for all but the coldest days, and it’s among the burliest on our list with a thick and substantial 150-denier shell. Combined with Gore’s proven 2-layer waterproof design and a high-quality DWR coating, and you get reliable all-around toughness, weatherproofing, and warmth. It’s no surprise the Powder Bowl has been a staple in Patagonia’s snow lineup for years.
That said, in testing the Powder Bowl, we felt it struggled to justify its relatively steep price tag. Helly Hansen’s Alpha above easily beats the Patagonia in comfort—the Powder Bowl feels rigid and stiff compared with the Alpha’s stretchy and soft lining and shell. Further, we found the styling to be on the bland side (this may be a positive, however, for those that like to keep a low profile), and the fit was equally unimpressive with its fairly shapeless and boxy cut. In the end, we’d rather have Helly Hansen’s Alpha at this price point, and Patagonia’s own Snowshot and BD’s BoundaryLine above strike us as better values... Read in-depth review
See the Men's Patagonia Powder Bowl See the Women's Patagonia Powder Bowl
Category: Hybrid hard/softshell
Best for: Resort and backcountry
What we like: Stretchy, comfortable, and feature-rich.
What we don’t: Pricey for an in-house waterproof build.
Like the Flylow Gear Malone and Outdoor Research Skyward II above, Mammut’s Stoney HS does a nice job mixing the needs of resort and backcountry skiers. For lift-assisted days, you get full waterproofing and seam taping, a powder skirt, and a large, highly adjustable hood (the latter two items are removable). And for touring, the jacket includes pit zips, lots of storage, and fantastic all-around comfort thanks to a soft and slightly stretchy polyester/polyamid construction. Finally, we think Mammut nailed all the details—everything from the large and glove-friendly zipper pulls to the included Lycra hand gaiters have a quality feel to them.
What pushes the Stoney slightly down our list is that we don’t think it’s a strong value. Like the aforementioned Malone and Skyward, the Stoney uses an in-house waterproof build, and it can’t match the bombproof performance of a Gore-Tex shell (the upside is decent breathability). But at $500, the jacket costs about the same as standard Gore-Tex and about $100 higher the Flylow and OR options. It’s true you get a small upgrade in fit and finish as well as extras like the hand gaiters, but it strikes us as a little pricey compared to the rest of the market... Read in-depth review
See the Men's Mammut Stoney Hardshell
Best for: Resort
What we like: Standout value for a Gore-Tex-equipped shell.
What we don’t: Unproven over the long term.
REI has jumped into the ski outwear market for 2021 with a small collection of resort-focused pieces, and their current top-flight jacket is the First Chair GTX. As expected from the Seattle-based brand, this non-insulated shell is high on value: for $299, you get Gore-Tex waterproofing, a soft-touch interior, and valuable features like a powder skirt, pit zips, and seven well-distributed pockets. Another nice touch is the emphasis on sustainability, with a recycled polyester lining, PFC-free DWR coating, and bluesign-approved materials. Taken together, the First Chair is a solid all-around option and particularly for resort riders.
As expected for the price, the First Chair isn’t as well-suited for active use. Gore’s 2-layer construction isn’t a standout in terms of breathability, and the smooth lining covering the interior adds both weight and bulk. In addition, they’ve incorporated cheaper fabric flaps over the zippers on the pockets and pit zips for waterproof protection (the center zipper is coated, however). And finally, REI hasn’t proven themselves yet in this category and their fit and finish consistently comes up short of high-end brands like Patagonia and Arc’teryx. But for a thoughtfully designed hardshell that ticks the right boxes for season-long use at a great price, the First Chair is well worth checking out.
See the Men's REI Co-op First Chair GTX See the Women's REI First Chair GTX
Best for: Backcountry and resort
What we like: Premium all-around performance.
What we don’t: Crinkly and stiff; overkill for average resort days.
Sitting atop Patagonia’s impressive line of ski shells is the PowSlayer. The Snowshot and Powder Bowl above are tuned for the resort, but the PowSlayer is a favorite among active backcountry and sidecountry explorers. It’s outfitted with Gore-Tex’s top-of-the-line Pro construction, which breathes nearly as well as upstarts like Polartec’s NeoShell or eVent, and the premium materials do a nice job mixing weight and durability (the shell is noisy and pretty stiff, however). And reflecting Patagonia's strong environmental push, the face fabric incorporates 100-percent-recycled nylon without any noticeable impact on performance.
The smaller features of the PowSlayer also are thoughtfully designed and made to last: zippers are smooth and confidence-inspiring, and an innovative cord-locking system is user-friendly and keeps clutter to a minimum. With a total of eight pockets (five outer, three internal), Patagonia didn’t skimp on organization despite an impressively light total weight of just over 1 pound 3 ounces. Simply put, the PowSlayer may be overkill for the resort, but it’s the whole package for serious weather and the backcountry... Read in-depth review
See the Men's Patagonia PowSlayer See the Women's Patagonia PowSlayer
Best for: Backcountry
What we like: Excellent breathability and stretchiness.
What we don't: Not completely waterproof.
For long tours in mild conditions, a softshell jacket is more breathable and has better stretchiness than a traditional hardshell. Dynafit’s Beast Hybrid stands out in this category thanks to its lightweight construction, trim and performance-oriented fit, and competitive price. The “Hybrid” in the name relates to its two fabric types: a waterproof 3-layer shell covers the upper body, arms, and hood, while a thinner 2-layer softshell around the lower body lets out hot air and provides excellent mobility. This balanced design excels for springtime use and in areas like the Rocky Mountains that see a lot of dry powder throughout the season.
The downside of the Dynafit’s hybrid build is that its protection falls short in wet conditions and for resort days—even sitting on a chairlift can leave you vulnerable to moisture seeping through. Further, we’d like to see pit zips added to the shell for times when you really need to dump heat on the uphill. In the end, the Dynafit can’t match the versatility of the $50-cheaper and fully waterproof Outdoor Research Skyward II above, but its combination of weight and mobility make it a great secondary touring jacket to have in your quiver.
See the Men's Dynafit Beast Hybrid See the Women's Dynafit Beast Hybrid
Category: Hybrid hard/softshell
Best for: Backcountry and resort
What we like: Very stretchy and breathable.
What we don’t: Pretty pricey, and not as weatherproof as Gore-Tex.
Based in Aspen, Colorado, Strafe specializes in technical, high-performing outerwear. Their Pyramid shell pays homage to a local peak and packs a unique in-house 3-layer membrane that offers four-way stretch. In some ways resembling Polartec NeoShell (it’s worth noting that prior versions of the jacket were made with NeoShell), the stretchy membrane has a softshell-like feel, and its breathability is on par with jackets made with eVent and Outdoor Research’s AscentShell.
At its steep $599 price, the Pyramid goes head-to-head with Gore-Tex designs like the Arc’teryx Sabre above. Where the Strafe has a slight leg up is comfort: the stretchy material is soft and won’t restrict movement like a traditional hardshell. However, it doesn’t have the impervious feel of those Gore-Tex options. The Pyramid’s shell is air-permeable, so it doesn’t completely block strong gusts, and its exterior is more prone to wetting out. As such, the jacket is not a go-to choice for brutally cold environments or the wet snow of the Pacific Northwest, but the Pyramid is a great option for areas with dry snow like the brand’s home state of Colorado.
See the Men's Strafe Pyramid See the Women's Strafe Eden
Insulated: Yes (fleece)
Best for: Resort
What we like: Affordable way to get out on the slopes.
What we don’t: Cheap construction and generic fit.
The essential duties of a resort jacket are to keep you warm, protected from moisture and wind, and have enough pockets for the basics. Columbia’s answer to these needs is the Bugaboo Interchange, a 3-in-1 ski jacket at a very attractive price point. It’s warm with a fleece zip-out jacket and Columbia’s signature (and somewhat polarizing) Omni-Heat reflective lining. The silvery interior is a little too disco for us when we slip it off, but it does feel like it’s working by radiating your body heat.
We’ve found the basic shell and lining do impact breathability, and a lack of pit zips means the Bugaboo can run hot. In addition, the material quality isn’t up to snuff compared with the options above and is more prone to wetting out (regular washing and reapplying the DWR does help). But on easy resort days coast to coast, this is all the jacket that most weekend warriors need. For a similar 3-in-1 design that trades the fleece liner of the Bugaboo for a synthetic jacket, check out the Columbia Whirlibird IV Interchange.
See the Men's Columbia Bugaboo See the Women's Columbia Bugaboo
Best for: Backcountry
What we like: Great price and design for mild-weather backcountry skiing.
What we don’t: Big step down in weather protection from the options above.
The softshell designs above from Strafe, Dynafit, and Flylow all offer fairly good weather protection but are overkill for mild conditions and dry snow. Enter the Outdoor Research San Juan, which is thin, breathable, and includes a surprisingly good mix of ski touring-specific features. It’s been tailored for backcountry use with dedicated pockets along the interior for climbing skins, and the hood is properly sized to cinch comfortably over a large ski helmet. The San Juan’s fit also hits the mark for uphill travel with a trim cut that isn’t too bulky when wearing over just a thin baselayer.
There’s a reason, however, that the OR San Juan falls at the end of our list: versatility. Simply put, it’s a fun jacket to have in your quiver but will only excel on certain days of the year. It’s not waterproof or even highly water-resistant, and sustained moisture will make its way through the unprotected zippers and seams. But for those that get out a lot and want a fair-weather option for those types of days, the San Juan makes a lot of sense. And it certainly doesn’t hurt that the jacket is priced right at $169.
See the Men's Outdoor Research San Juan See the Women's OR San Juan
|Arc'teryx Sabre AR||$675||Hardshell||No (light)||Resort/backcountry||1 lb. 8.7 oz.||Yes|
|Helly Hansen Alpha 3.0||$475||Hard/softshell||Yes||Resort||2 lb. 3 oz.||Yes|
|Outdoor Research Skyward II||$350||Hard/softshell||No||Backcountry/resort||1 lb. 9.5 oz.||No|
|TNF ThermoBall Eco Triclimate||$349||3-in-1||Yes||Resort||2 lb. 3.3 oz.||No|
|Columbia Last Tracks||$175||Hardshell||Yes||Resort||Unavail.||No|
|Patagonia Insulated Snowshot||$329||Hardshell||Yes||Resort||2 lb. 0.5 oz.||Yes|
|Norrøna Lofoten GTX Pro||$699||Hardshell||No||Backcountry/resort||1 lb. 8.6 oz.||No|
|Flylow Gear Malone||$400||Hard/softshell||No||Backcountry/resort||1 lb. 5.3 oz.||No|
|Arc’teryx Macai||$999||Hardshell||Yes||Resort||2 lb. 4 oz.||Yes|
|Marmot Spire||$435||Hardshell||No||Resort/backcountry||1 lb. 9 oz.||No|
|Black Diamond BoundaryLine||$349||Hardshell||Yes||Resort||1 lb. 13.5 oz.||No|
|Arc'teryx Alpha SV||$799||Hardshell||No||Backcountry||1 lb. 2 oz.||Yes|
|Outdoor Research Hemispheres||$599||Hardshell||No||Backcountry/resort||1 lb. 4.7 oz.||No|
|Patagonia Powder Bowl||$479||Hardshell||Yes||Resort||2 lb. 6.2 oz.||Yes|
|Mammut Stoney Hardshell||$499||Hard/softshell||No||Resort/backcountry||1 lb. 11.7 oz.||No|
|REI Co-op First Chair GTX||$299||Hardshell||No||Resort||1 lb. 11.7 oz.||No|
|Patagonia PowSlayer||$699||Hardshell||No||Backcountry/resort||1 lb. 3.3 oz.||Yes|
|Dynafit Beast Hybrid||$400||Softshell||No||Backcountry||1 lb. 3.2 oz.||No|
|Strafe Pyramid||$599||Hard/softshell||No||Backcountry/resort||1 lb. 12 oz.||No|
|Columbia Bugaboo Interchange||$180||3-in-1||Yes||Resort||2 lb. 6 oz.||No|
|Outdoor Research San Juan||$169||Softshell||No||Backcountry||1 lb. 6.7 oz.||No|
- Ski Jacket Categories
- Ski Jacket Insulation
- Best Uses: Backcountry or Resort
- Jacket Layers: 2L vs. 3L
- Common Features
- Ski Jacket Fit
- Layering Underneath Your Ski Jacket
Ski jackets can be broken into three main categories: hardshell, softshell, and 3-in-1. Choosing the right model depends largely on your skiing style and budget. The most popular is the hardshell, which encompasses everyone from casual resort skiers to backcountry adventurers in harsh, wet environments. Softshells are a growing ski jacket option and are preferred for ski touring in mild conditions, while 3-in-1 jackets are a good choice for budget-seekers. Below is a quick breakdown, and for a deeper dive, check out our article on ski jacket types.
Hardshell jackets offer sturdy protection from wind and moisture, and can be suitable for both backcountry and resort use. Made with multiple layers of fabric laminated together, they are typically waterproof, windproof, and at least modestly breathable. Insulation is optional: some are a true, non-insulated “shell” while others have synthetic or down fill (insulation is covered in more detail below).
Price varies widely within this category. High-end hardshell jackets like the Arc’teryx Sabre AR have a Gore-Tex, eVent, or NeoShell laminate and tailored fit for excellent range of motion. Basic shells use thicker fabrics and cheaper waterproofing that doesn't breathe as well. Beginning and occasional skiers will be fine with an entry-level hardshell jacket, but those that get out a lot will likely appreciate the upgrade to a high-end design.
For high-exertion activities like ski touring or sidecountry hikes, a non-waterproof softshell offers unparalleled comfort and breathability. As backcountry skiing grows in popularity, so too does the prevalence of these stretchy jackets. Their main downside is weather resistance, or lack thereof. Even with a hybrid design like the Dynafit Beast Hybrid, which uses a waterproof 3-layer shell around the upper half and thinner 2-layer softshell at the lower body, they still aren’t as comfortable in wet snow or at the resort. For the right use and the right conditions, however, a softshell can be a fantastic performance piece. Those with a multi-jacket quiver typically have at least one softshell at their disposal.
With an outer shell and zip-in insulated layer, 3-in-1 jackets are extremely popular for casual skiers. The main advantage is cost savings: you can pick up a decent 3-in-1 jacket for around $180-$300, and it comes with a midlayer (most often a fleece or synthetic jacket that you can wear for everyday use). And unlike insulated models, you can leave behind the warming layer simply by unzipping it.
3-in-1 jackets do add bulk and weight with the extra zippers, and integrating the shell and insulating layer negatively affects range of motion. Also, you often end up with an inferior product (as the price would suggest). These jackets are far from the best performers in high-exertion activities—opting for one with pit zips is suggested. Nonetheless, for the budget-seeker or skier that only makes it to the mountain a couple times a year, a 3-in-1 like the Columbia Bugaboo Interchange is a good way to get kitted out for a reasonable price.
Comfort ranks highly for resort-goers, and to help make cold chairlift rides more tolerable, many skiers select a hardshell jacket with insulation. Choices in insulation come down to the classic debate: down vs. synthetic. Down will give you premium warmth with less bulk, while synthetic is cheaper and will outperform down should moisture make its way through the lining. Arc’teryx opts for the best of both worlds in their Macai jacket, which uses down in the core and synthetic in areas prone to moisture—that includes your own sweat—like the underarms and hood. Insulated jackets add a little bulk and they impact range of motion more than when layering with a separate midlayer beneath a shell. But for those that run a little cold or ski in frigid climates on-piste, an insulated jacket is a popular way to go.
If you opt for an insulated model, it’s a good idea to carefully consider how much warmth you need. A thick and substantial option like the aforementioned Arc’teryx Macai is a dream in the cold but will run hot on mild-weather days—we had to open the pit zips and occasionally unzip the front to stay comfortable—which can be a problem for season-long use. As such, we typically prefer moderate levels of warmth, such as Patagonia’s Snowshot (80g and 40g synthetic) or Helly Hansen’s Alpha 3.0 (80g). These jackets give you the flexibility to add a midlayer if the mercury really drops without overheating if the sun comes out and temperatures rise midday. There’s certainly a time and place for a heavily insulated model, but most skiers will be better off with a more balanced design.
Ski jackets often are designed for a specific purpose—resort, backcountry, or a mix—so we’ve included a “best for” listing in our specifications and table. The vast majority of skiers spend at least a little time on a chairlift, and as a result, most ski jackets accommodate those needs. Specifically, a resort shell should be durable, at least partially wind and waterproof, and have a fit that can accommodate layers of varying sizes underneath. Insulation is optional for resort-goers but a bad idea for most backcountry uses.
For ski touring, mountaineering, or sidecountry hikes, a non-insulated and lightweight design takes precedence (one exception is the insulated Arc'teryx Rush IS, which we review here). The fabrics need to be thin and packable, which impacts durability, and there is a high priority on technology. Softshell jackets lead the pack in breathability, but for heavy wind and moisture, a premium hardshell still is best. Fit does vary by use—freeride shells are roomy while touring-specific designs fit more snugly—but all designs focus on mobility. The jackets that toe the line of backcountry and resort use have a great fit, good enough durability, and fabrics that are impervious to the wind and wet but still ventilate. It’s a tall order and requires ponying up a large sum of money, but we’ve found that Arc’teryx puts it all together better than anyone else.
One specification you’ll consistently run into as you research ski jackets is the number of fabric layers (either 2L or 3L). This feature points to construction: a 2-layer jacket bonds the exterior face fabric to a waterproof membrane and has a separate liner along the interior (often mesh), while a 3-layer build connects all three pieces together. In terms of cost, 2-layer models are often found on entry-level to mid-range options, including Columbia’s $175 Last Tracks and Patagonia’s $329 Snowshot Insulated. Stepping up to a 3-layer design usually means a price tag north of $400 or $500.
How do the construction types differ in terms of performance? Starting with 2-layer jackets, these are popular among resort riders as they offer solid weatherproofing and durability at a good value. Downsides are that 2-layer jackets aren’t very breathable, and the extra hanging liner adds both weight and bulk. Active resort and backcountry skiers often choose a 3-layer build for its improved range of motion, comfort, and lighter weight. In addition, 3-layer jackets breathe reasonably well and high-end Gore-Tex-equipped models are market leaders in protection in the harshest conditions. If you stick to the resort, either a 2- or 3-layer build can do the trick, but we recommend a 3-layer option for the ski touring crowd.
Ski jackets are waterproof pretty much across the board, from cheap $100 options all the way up to high-end Gore-Tex (or equivalent) shells. One exception is a backcountry-specific softshell, which may have seam taping but will eventually let in moisture. Among waterproof options, spending more will get you a longer lifespan, on average, as the more advanced fabrics aren’t as prone to deteriorating. Those that get out a lot or are deep in the backcountry in serious conditions should consider investing in a burly Gore-Tex Pro shell like the Patagonia PowSlayer. The shell fabric and waterproof membrane are very impressive performers in brutal wind and snowfall. Most resort skiers, however, will be just fine with an entry-level option like the Columbia Bugaboo Interchange. Finally, look for a jacket with a DWR (durable water repellent) coating, which helps shed wet snow to keep moisture from sitting on your jacket and wetting through the outer fabric.
Breathability ranks as a top priority for backcountry use, and a little less so with downhill skiing. While you can absolutely work up a sweat on your way down the mountain, it’s easy to dump heat with pit zips or dropping a layer at the resort midday (so long as you can survive the chairlift ride minus some insulation). Shell jackets are the best breathers, and those with a high-end 3-layer fabric construction (Gore-Tex, eVent, Polartec NeoShell, or OR's AscentShell) are head and shoulders above the rest for waterproof jackets. Generally, the more you spend on an uninsulated hardshell, the better the breathability. Softshells are the all-around leaders because they don't have to deal with the waterproofing layer, but the clear downside is wind and water resistance.
Skiing is a rough sport—everything from getting on and off the lift to hiking and riding off-trail can wreak havoc on gear—so your outer layers are often quite durable. Denier, or “D,” is how fabric thickness is measured, and a higher number correlates with a more substantial build. Overall, resort skiers are best off with a burlier construction, and some of our favorites are about 100D and up. If you prioritize a lighter set-up for mobility but still want something tough, jackets with about 70D like the Arc’teryx Sabre AR are a nice compromise. And finally, backcountry shells are often the thinnest for weight savings, with popular jackets ranging from 40D (Patagonia’s PowSlayer) to about 70D (OR’s Hemispheres and Norrøna's Lofoten Gore-Tex Pro). It’s worth noting that some manufacturers do not provide this specification, but you can make some safe assumptions based on intended use: expect a thicker build with a resort shell and a bit less durability for active and touring designs.
For resort skiers, the weight of your ski jacket isn’t usually a deciding factor. As long as you’re comfortable, it’s easy to handle a few extra ounces without really noticing (even the 2-pound-3.3-ounce The North Face ThermoBall Snow Triclimate isn't excessively heavy for the typical ski day). On average, cheaper jackets compensate for their less advanced fabrics by using more of it, making for thicker, durable shells. It’s when you start hiking or venturing off-trail that a lighter jacket starts to make a lot of sense. This is when a dedicated, lightweight hardshell may be the ideal choice for your skiing needs. Standouts in this category include the Arc'teryx Alpha SV (1 lb. 2 oz.), Dynafit Beast Hybrid (1 lb. 3.2 oz.), and Patagonia PowSlayer (1 lb. 3.3 oz.).
Most hoods go unused for downhill skiing—a helmet is a fine source of protection and insulation. It’s most often on the chairlift when you really need to hunker down does the hood come out. For those particularly nasty days, make sure to get a hood that is large enough to fit over your ski helmet. And not only does it have to be large enough, but it also needs to be plenty adjustable to cinch down and stay pinned to your head while skiing. A properly adjusted hood should not interfere with your field of vision as a good safety measure. Finally, should you want to use your ski jacket for more than just skiing, ensure that your hood fits well when you’re not wearing your helmet.
Unless you ski with a backpack, it’s important to select a jacket with multiple pockets. Most ski jackets include a couple of hand pockets and at least one zippered Napoleon pocket at the chest. That Napoleon pocket is great for stashing smaller items like a phone, camera, or wallet. To protect your electronics, it’s good to have a chest pocket along the interior of the jacket so your body heat can help keep everything functioning properly (the “Life Pocket” on the Helly Hansen Alpha 3.0 is specially insulated to limit battery drain on your electronics). If you listen to music while on the mountain, look for a chest-height pocket with an interior opening to feed your headphone cord for a clutter-free set-up.
Other useful storage options include mesh hanging pockets built into the jacket’s inner lining. These serve as a nice place to stash your gloves, goggles, or glasses in between runs or if you’re starting to overheat while hiking. Further, they’re a practical choice for backcountry skiers that want to store their climbing skins on a short descent. Finally, you’ll see a number of resort-ready models include a sleeve pocket on the left arm, which allows for both easy access to your ski pass and compatibility with RFID passes and electronic gates.
Powder Skirts (Snow Skirts)
It's nearly impossible to keep the snow completely out should you ski through some really deep snow or take a serious tumble, but a powder skirt nonetheless is a great line of defense. Elasticized fabric is built into the lining of the jacket around the waist, and will typically secure to your ski pants near the front zipper. This helps snow from entering in the space between your pants and the bottom hem of the jacket. Some manufacturers make the snow skirts removable should you want to use the jacket around town.
Jacket-to-Pant Attachment Systems
Like the powder skirt, jacket-to-pant attachment systems are all about maximizing protection and warmth. Designs don’t vary significantly within the ski market, and most utilize a simple button on the powder skirt that secures to a corresponding piece on the pant (in the case of Patagonia, this is a fabric loop). The upside in connecting your outer layers is creating an even more solid seal from the wet and cold, but it’s certainly not a required feature for either resort or backcountry use. It’s worth noting that in nearly all cases, you’ll need to purchase a pant from the same brand for the interface system to work. And many manufacturers, like Outdoor Research and Black Diamond, skip the feature altogether.
Skiing can be a high exertion activity, and waterproof jackets, no matter the quality, restrict airflow. Enter the pit zip. Open them all the way, extending from approximately the middle of your ribcage to just above your elbow, and you can release a whole lot of hot air. Although they’re not a necessity for the easygoing skier and do add a bit of weight and bulk, we recommend putting pit zips on the active skier's “must have” list when jacket shopping. One design that really stands out is Outdoor Research's Skyward, which has pit zips that extend all the way to the hem.
In the table above, we've listed jackets that are equipped with a RECCO reflector. These are for skiers that make their way out of bounds or into areas prone to avalanches. The RECCO reflector built into your ski jacket or pant is a passive unit that doesn’t require batteries and can be picked up by RECCO detectors often carried by resort search and rescue. They lack the technology and strong signal of a dedicated search and rescue beacon, but they do provide an additional safety measure should you venture off-trail.
In general, the fit of a ski jacket will correspond with its intended use. Resort designs like Patagonia’s Snowshot have a roomy shape to allow you to wear a range of base and midlayers underneath. In addition, they have a long cut with a drop hem to provide protection from frozen chairlift seats. On the other end of the spectrum are backcountry-specific builds like the Outdoor Research Skyward II, which are trimmed down to minimize bulk and improve range of motion. They’re snug enough to move with you comfortably on the skin track, but have just enough space to accommodate a puffy for transitioning and on the descent. Finally, an option like the Arc’teryx Sabre AR lands in the middle and aims to balance backcountry and resort needs. It’s large enough to not feel restrictive when wearing a midweight down jacket, but has excellent mobility for hiking and occasional uphill travel.
Unless you opt for a 3-in-1 jacket, you’ll likely want a dedicated midlayer for skiing. The amount of insulation can vary dramatically, from a thin fleece to a puffy down jacket. Fleece jackets are the classic choice for skiing, and can be quite warm and lightweight, but mid and heavyweight designs are bulky. Down is the pricey option but is unmatched in lightweight compressible warmth (just make sure to keep it dry because it will stop insulating when wet), and synthetic fill splits the difference. It has a fairly good warmth-to-weight ratio and retains its insulating properties when wet. For more on midlayers along with our top picks, see our article on the best midlayers.
Baselayers and their next-to-skin warmth are important in keeping you toasty and dry. A breathable and well-ventilated jacket will only perform as well as the baselayer underneath, so don’t skimp here. Synthetics, like those made by Patagonia or Helly Hansen, are comfortable and breathe well at a reasonable cost. The downside is they are less soft and more prone to retaining unpleasant odors. Merino wool is expensive, but excels in temperature regulation and odor prevention. On all but the coldest days, our go-to baselayers are the lightweight or midweight options for a good balance of warmth and breathability.
Back to Our Top Ski Jacket Picks Back to Our Ski Jacket Comparison Table