Bindings aren’t the flashiest piece of ski gear you’ll buy, but they’re certainly a very important one. As the connection between boot and ski, they play a fundamental role in power transfer, responsiveness, and safety. When purchasing a binding, you’ll want to pay attention to DIN, boot sole compatibility, brake width, and more. For additional background information, see our ski binding comparison table and buying advice below the picks. To complete your set-up, check out our articles on the best all-mountain skis, downhill boots, and ski poles.

Best Overall Ski Binding

1. Marker Griffon 13 ID ($230)

Marker Griffon 13 ID ski bindingDIN: 4-13
Sole compatibility: Alpine, Touring, WTR, GripWalk
Brake sizes: 90, 100, 110, 120mm
What we like: Solid reputation, great power transfer, and a reasonable price.
What we don’t: Despite recent improvements, it’s still not the easiest to step into in powder.

Quality bindings are safe, reliable, and transfer energy supremely well. Marker’s popular Griffon 13 ID does all of that with aplomb and is an excellent choice for skiers of nearly all ability levels. With a respectable DIN range from 4-13, premium materials, wide variety of available colorways, and a long track record of durability and top-end performance, they’ve been a favorite of ours for many seasons. For last winter, Marker made some modest tweaks to the heel piece to improve the feel and consistency while stepping in, but the rest of the proven design remains.

The “ID” in the name refers to the Marker’s boot compatibility, which is among the widest ranging on the market. The toe piece is set up to accommodate anything from a standard downhill model to GripWalk, Walk-to-Ride, and even touring-specific soles (ISO 9523). In addition, the brakes are easily swappable for varying ski widths and available in sizes that should accommodate the vast majority of all-mountain shapes. For expert-level skiers looking for a higher max DIN, check out the Marker Jester below, which is essentially the same binding with a 16-DIN release.
See the Marker Griffon 13 ID


Best Binding for Hard Chargers and Freeskiers

2. Look Pivot 15 GW ($400)

Look Pivot 15 GW ski bindingDIN: 6-15
Sole compatibility: Alpine, GripWalk
Brake sizes: 95, 115, 130mm
What we like: Standout elasticity with its heel piece; high-quality metal construction.
What we don’t: Pricey and overkill for casual skiers.

The Look Pivot series is a classic in the world of alpine skiing. Its signature piece is the Pivot heel, which Look nailed the mechanics on over a quarter-century ago: it gives the binding a short footprint on the ski, allowing for natural flex, and has industry-leading elastic travel to help prevent knee injuries and avoid pre-releasing (a plus for hard chargers and those hitting big features). This binding has served some of the world’s best skiers for decades, and it continues to be a solid choice for intermediate to expert-level riders.

The big news last season was the Pivot 15, which is essentially a toned-down variation of the legendary 18-DIN model. You get full metal construction for standout durability (including the toe piece, which is rare), and the design is compatible with GripWalk as well as standard alpine (ISO 5355) boot soles. It’s true that the Pivot line is overkill and pricey for casual riders—even the “entry-level” 12 model comes in at $280—but it’s hard to beat the combination of build quality, lateral release, and longevity.
See the Look Pivot 15 GW


Best Binding for Intermediate Skiers

3. Tyrolia Attack 11 GW ($179)

Tyrolia Attack 11 GW downhill ski bindingDIN: 3-11
Sole compatibility: Alpine, GripWalk
Brake sizes: 85, 95, 110mm
What we like: Well made and priced right for an intermediate skier.
What we don’t: Lower performance threshold.

Transitioning from high-end bindings to a more budget-oriented model, the Tyrolia Attack is a no-brainer for beginners to intermediates putting together a new ski package. Its lightweight toe is strong enough for most resort days and contributes to a very playful feel, and the Tyrolia’s platform is well-suited for an average to moderately stiff set-up. And as with the options above, the Attack also has a low stack height, which increases your feeling of connectedness with your skis.

Considering the lightweight plastics and lower DIN, these bindings are not for hard chargers or heavier skiers trying to extract every last ounce of performance from their skis (the Griffon and Pivot above easily win out for those folks). But for casual resort-goers that stick mostly to green and blue runs, the Tyrolia Attack 11 is a solid pick. Finally, it’s worth noting that we prefer the Attack over Marker’s popular Squire, as it beats the Squire in price by about $10 with no substantial differences in performance.
See the Tyrolia Attack 11 GW


Best Hybrid Binding for Resort and Backcountry Skiing

4. Salomon S/Lab Shift MNC 13 ($600)

Salomon SLab Shift MNC 13 ski bindingDIN: 6-13
Sole compatibility: Alpine, Touring, WTR, GripWalk
Brake sizes: 90, 100, 110, 120mm
What we like: Fairly uncompromised uphill and downhill performance.
What we don’t: Expensive and heavy compared to touring-specific tech bindings.

For those who like to split their time between the resort and backcountry, the Salomon S/Lab Shift MNC 13 is our favorite quiver-of-one binding. The key ingredient is the toe piece, which functions like a touring-specific tech binding for uphill travel, but converts into a traditional downhill design once you’re in ski mode. This gives the Shift impressive versatility: you can wear your downhill boots and put down the power in hardpack and crud, or go lightweight with your touring set-up on a backcountry adventure. And in terms of downhill performance, the Shift is fairly uncompromised, giving you performance and safety on par with some of the best bindings here.

Skiers looking for a do-all binding simply won’t find a better design than the S/Lab Shift. It’s noticeably lighter and lower slung than hybrid frame styles like the Marker Baron EPF 13 or Tyrolia Ambition below, and unlike Marker’s high-end Duke PT it doesn’t have removable parts that might get lost in the bottom of your pack. Further, the Shift is certified to alpine safety standards (you even get 47mm of lateral elasticity—good news for your knees). But the Salomon is heavier than standard tech bindings, and you’ll have to be a bit choosy with your boots (it’s not compatible with touring boots that don’t have full toe and heel lugs, including the Hoji Pro Tour and Arc’teryx Procline). Of note: the Shift is also sold under the Armada and Atomic brand names (all three are part of the Amer Sports group), with the only difference being color... Read in-depth review
See the Salomon S/Lab Shift MNC 13


Best of the Rest

5. Salomon STH2 WTR 13 ($250)

Salomon STH2 WTR 13 ski bindingDIN: 5-13
Sole compatibility: Alpine, WTR
Brake sizes: 90, 100, 115, 130mm
What we like: Low-profile and solid feel.
What we don’t: Pricier and not as versatile as the Griffon above.

The Salomon STH2 and Marker Griffon above are two of the most popular binding options for aggressive downhill skiers, and for good reason. They both offer a sturdy feel, good power transfer on a wide ski, and are known to hold up over the long haul. You truly can’t go wrong with either, and for some the decision is so close that it comes down to which color option matches their skis best (the Marker gets the edge this season in available colorways with four compared to the Salomon’s two).

What pushes the STH2 a little down our list is price and ski-boot compatibility. Salomon bumped the MSRP up $20 last season, which means it’s now more expensive than the 13-DIN Griffon. It’s also less versatile: the toe piece on the STH2 is only compatible with Walk-to-Ride and ISO 5355 boots, while the Griffon can also accommodate GripWalk and touring soles. And while the Salomon has traditionally been the easier model to step into in deep powder, Marker closed the gap quite a bit with the latest model. There’s not much else that separates the two, but those small differences are enough for us to give the overall advantage to the Griffon. For a Salomon design with greater binding compatibility, including both GripWalk and ISO 9523 Touring soles, check out the Warden MNC 13 ($270) or 11-DIN Warden ($200) below.
See the Salomon STH2 WTR 13


6. Marker Jester 16 ID ($360-$380)

Marker Jester 16 ID ski bindingDIN: 6-16
Sole compatibility: Alpine, Touring, WTR, GripWalk
Brake sizes: 90, 100, 110, 120mm
What we like: Bomber construction without adding too much weight.
What we don’t: Too much binding for most skiers; expensive.

Marker’s Royal Family of bindings covers a wide range, from the intermediate-friendly Squire (below) to the burly Duke PT for backcountry specialists. For the hardcore alpine skier that needs a high DIN, the Jester amounts to a beefed-up version of the Griffon above. In short, you get a bump up in max DIN from 13 to 16 and the addition of magnesium in a few strategic places. The extra metal increases rigidity without a big weight penalty, and it also adds a degree of security for those who like to hit big jumps in the park (although the plastic Griffon is very tough).

Despite its reputation and popularity among professional skiers, the Jester is bumped down on our list because it’s more binding than most skiers will ever need. Even expert-level riders will be plenty happy with the 80-gram-lighter Griffon in most instances. And tacking on $130 to what is essentially the same design feels pretty steep. But for the skier that’s out every day all season and skis hard, the Jester is a proven option. And if 16-DIN is (somehow) not enough for you, there is an 18-DIN Jester Pro, which is made for those taking big mountain lines and drops.
See the Marker Jester 16 ID


7. Salomon Warden 11 MNC ($200)

Salomon Warden 11 MNC ski bindingDIN: 3.5-11
Sole compatibility: Alpine, Touring, WTR, GripWalk
Brake sizes: 90, 100, 115mm
What we like: An affordable MNC binding that gives the Griffon a run for its money.
What we don’t: Fixed-AFD bindings will offer a bit higher performance.

The original of the multi-norm certified (MNC) category, Salomon’s Warden nailed the formula first-go, setting the standard for modern ski bindings. Like Marker’s Sole.ID technology, this means you can pair just about any boot with the Warden, lending versatility in a market that’s increasingly flooded by do-all, touring-capable designs (i.e. GripWalk and ISO 9523 soles). And you don’t compromise much on performance either: the Warden has a solid feel that charges hard on everything from corduroy and park jibs to fun lines in the slackcountry. Added up, it’s a very close competitor to the Griffon above in the 13-DIN variation (but $20 pricier), and the 11-DIN here is a burlier and better-built alternative to the Squire below.

To increase boot sole compatibility, Salomon’s MNC uses a height-adjustable toe and sliding antifriction device (AFD). On the other hand, Salomon’s STH2 uses a fixed AFD, which translates to better precision and energy transfer at the cost of versatility. To put it simply, if you don’t anticipate moving away from a standard alpine (downhill) boot, the STH2 is the better binding, especially for expert skiers. But if you want some leeway in your boot choice, you can’t go wrong with the Warden—and the price is right at just $200.
See the Salomon Warden 11 MNC


8. Marker Squire 11 ($190)

Marker Squire 11 ski bindingDIN: 3-11
Sole compatibility: Alpine, GripWalk
Brake sizes: 90, 100, 110mm
What we like: A dependable binding and decent price for casual or lightweight skiers.
What we don’t: Not as affordable as the Tyrolia Attack above.

Marker’s freeride lineup is headlined by high-powered, versatile designs like the Griffon and Jester, but the Germany-based company appeals to the entry-level market with the Squire 11 here. This is one of our favorite bindings for lighter weight and beginner-to-intermediate skiers, and a brand new redesign for 2022 features a sleek aesthetic and improved durability on the toe piece. Marker was also able to keep the Squire’s stack height relatively low (24mm) despite the GripWalk compatibility, which is great for power transfer and control.

At $190, the Squire 11 isn’t as good a value as the Tyrolia Attack above ($179), which is why we rank it here. And while previous iterations of the binding have had Marker’s “ID” technology, the latest version is only compatible with standard ISO 5355 alpine boots and those with GripWalk soles. But we do appreciate the option of a 110-millimeter brake size for fatter powder skis (of note, Tyrolia offers a 110mm brake on their latest Attack 11), and it’s hard to deny Marker’s brand cachet. The Squire is also sold in a 10-DIN version for $150, which is an even better value for true beginners, younger riders, and especially lightweight skiers.
See the Marker Squire 11


9. Tyrolia Ambition 10 ($349)

Tyrolia Ambition 10 ski bindingDIN: 3-10
Sole compatibility: Alpine, Touring, GripWalk
Brake sizes: 95, 105, 125mm
What we like: A reasonably priced backcountry binding that’s compatible with standard downhill boots.
What we don’t: Not great stability and power on the descent.

The Salomon S/Lab Shift MNC above is the clear winner when it comes to hybrid performance for front- and backcountry skiing, but at $600 ($550 for the 10-DIN) it’s a tough sell for beginners or those who spend most of their time at the resort. Enter the Tyrolia Ambition: a frame-style touring binding that’s compatible with a range of boot designs (including downhill, touring, and GripWalk soles) thanks to its sliding, tube-like frame and toe piece. This translates to easy versatility—unlike the Shift, you don’t need tech fittings for uphill travel—which is great for skiers who want to dip their toes into the backcountry without investing in a new (and expensive) pair of boots.

The Tyrolia Ambition manages to stay fairly lightweight for a budget frame-style binding (for reference, the Marker Baron EPF 13 is over 1.5 lbs. heavier for the pair), which is good news for the ascent. Cutting weight does result in compromised stability and power on the descent (including a towering 38mm stack height), and aggressive riders will be better off with a harder-charging and lower-slung design like the Baron or Shift. But the Ambition is completely serviceable for beginner to intermediate skiers, and it’s also a nicely stable option for those new to the skin track: you get a grand total of four climbing heights (some may find this overkill) and the option to add a crampon. All told, for backcountry-curious resort skiers or those on the hunt for a cheap and versatile touring set-up, the Ambition 10 is well worth a look.
See the Tyrolia Ambition 10


10. KneeBinding Carbon ($400) 

KneeBinding Carbon ski bindingDIN: 3-12
Sole compatibility: Alpine, GripWalk, WTR
Brake sizes: 75, 90, 110, 130, 150mm
What we like: An innovative option for those particularly worried about their knees.
What we don’t: Tall stand height and lack a modern fit and finish.

Every year, thousands of skiers have season-ending knee injuries, which gives the KneeBinding concept a lot of appeal. Here’s how it works: rather than a standard alpine binding that releases either laterally at the toe or upward at the heel, the KneeBinding adds a lateral heel release (dubbed their PureLateral Heel) to alleviate potentially dangerous pressure on your ligaments (you can find a video describing the design here). And to address potential unwanted ejections due to the additional release point, KneeBinding developed a floating mount system that flexes with the ski and keeps you secure during normal ski behavior.

What are the downsides of this unique alpine set-up? One of the biggest is stack height: while most bindings here ride 24 millimeters or less above the surface of the ski, the Carbon’s 32-millimeter height means you get overall less control, especially in powder and on uneven terrain. Skiers also gripe about the difficulty of stepping in (it requires a lot of force) and the KneeBinding aesthetic in general (it’s admittedly archaic compared to modern designs). Finally, it’s worth noting that the Carbon also comes in a 14-DIN variation, which is good news for heavier and hard-charging skiers.
See the KneeBinding Carbon


11. Look SPX 12 GW ($230)

Look SPX 12 GW ski bindingDIN: 3.5-12
Sole compatibility: Alpine, GripWalk
Brake sizes: 90, 100, 120mm
What we like: Great choice for intermediate to advanced resort skiers.
What we don’t: A step down in power transfer.

The final binding to make our list is Look's long-standing SPX 12. With a max DIN of 12 (a 10-DIN model is also offered for $180), it lands in between a beginner/intermediate binding like the Tyrolia Attack and the expert-level options above. Now in its fourth iteration, the binding is a great fit for an all-mountain ski in the 80- to 100-millimeter width range that’s used primarily on-piste. And as with the Marker and Salomon options above, the SPX has a solid feel that is very confidence-inspiring.

It's close, but the Look does come up a little short in terms of value. It features a slightly lower max DIN compared with the Griffon and STH2, doesn’t provide any notable upgrades in ease of use or performance, and costs about the same (it matches the Griffon at $230 and is $20 less than the STH2). That said, the Look is plenty for weekend warriors—the toe and heel offer good elasticity and aren’t prone to releasing early, and the SPX line has GripWalk boot compatibility. Finally, for bargain hunters, there's also the Look NX 12 GW, which has a less burly heel but saves you $30.
See the Look SPX 12 GW


Ski Binding Comparison Table

Binding Price DIN Sole Weight Brake Sizes Height
Marker Griffon 13 ID $230 4-13 Alpine, Touring, WTR, GW 4 lb. 8 oz. 90, 100, 110, 120mm 24mm
Look Pivot 15 GW $400 6-15 Alpine, GripWalk 5 lb. 8 oz. 95, 115, 130mm 19mm
Tyrolia Attack 11 GW $179 3-11 Alpine, GripWalk 4 lb. 6 oz. 85, 95, 110mm 17mm
Salomon Shift MNC $600 6-13 Alpine, Touring, WTR, GW 3 lb. 14 oz. 90, 100, 110, 120mm 30mm
Salomon STH2 WTR 13 $250 5-13 Alpine, WTR 5 lb. 1 oz. 90, 100, 115, 130mm 18.4mm
Marker Jester 16 ID $360 6-16 Alpine, Touring, WTR, GW 4 lb. 10 oz. 90, 100, 110, 120mm 24mm
Salomon Warden 11 MNC $200 3.5-11 Alpine, Touring, WTR, GW 4 lb. 6 oz. 90, 100, 115mm 24.5mm
Marker Squire 11 $190 3-11 Alpine, GripWalk 3 lb. 10 oz. 90, 100, 110mm 24mm
Tyrolia Ambition 10 $349 3-10 Alpine, Touring, GW 4 lb. 5 oz. 95, 105, 125mm 38mm
KneeBinding Carbon $400 3-12 Alpine, WTR, GripWalk 4 lb. 12 oz. 75, 90, 110, 130, 150mm 32mm
Look SPX 12 GW $230 3.5-12 Alpine, GripWalk 4 lb. 13 oz. 90, 100, 120mm 33.5mm

Editor's note: "GW" is short for GripWalk

Ski Binding Buying Advice

What is DIN and How Much Do I Need?

A good ski binding stays securely attached to your ski boots while you’re cruising down the slopes, but is built to release under force, such as in the event of a fall (the last thing you want is to tumble down a hill with long planks attached to your feet). Standard ski bindings have two primary release points: the toe, which releases with side to side force, and the heel, which responds to front to back force (KneeBinding notably adds a lateral release at the heel). These release points can be tightened or loosened to find the right tension for your body and ski style—and this is where the DIN number comes in.

Downhill ski bindings (turning on groomed snow)
A DIN number is reflective of a skier's body size and ski style

DIN, which is short for Deutsches Institut für Normung (you can see why it’s shortened), refers to a standardized test that defines the amount of force at which a binding will release a locked-in boot. The numbers range from 1 to 18, and the higher you go, the longer the binding will hold you. High numbers are great for larger folks and those who like to ski aggressively, while lower numbers are well-suited towards skiers with lighter frames or less powerful styles. Understandably, this is a very important number to get right as a binding that releases either prematurely or too late can have pretty serious safety ramifications—not to mention an impact on performance. And while you’ll see a release range provided for every make and model of binding in the industry, keep in mind that not every binding has actually been DIN certified from the folks in Germany. 

For DIN recommendations, let us start by clarifying that even the charts put together by respected retailers like Evo,, or Backcountry are not a replacement for going into a ski shop. Our take is that if you’re not qualified and it’s a safety item, let the pros take care of it for you. Snowsports retailer Evo has put together a helpful chart that breaks down DIN settings by weight and ability, and when shopping for your right set-up, it’s a great idea to use this to ballpark your necessary DIN range. And as mentioned in this article by Evo, it’s best to choose a binding that doesn’t put you at the maximum DIN setting right off the bat (e.g., don’t get a 12-DIN binding if you’re planning on setting it at 12). It’s better to have a little wiggle room to make adjustments once you spend some time on your new sticks.

Stepping into ski binding
DIN can be adjusted on both the toe and heel pieces

Boot Sole Compatibility

Boot sole compatibility has been a moving target in the downhill and backcountry binding worlds for several years, and it’s very important to ensure that your set-up(s) match. Starting with traditional downhill boot soles (listed as Alpine DIN or ISO 5355), it’s simple and clear—all the bindings above are compatible. Moving to GripWalk and Walk to Ride (WTR), these designs are found on both downhill and backcountry boots, and not all bindings will work (for example, the popular Salomon STH2 binding isn’t GripWalk-ready). And finally, an even smaller number of bindings are set up to accommodate touring soles (ISO 9523).

The good news is that there are a growing number of bindings that are compatible with a wide range of sole types, including Marker’s Sole.ID and Salomon’s MNC (multi-norm certified) offerings. For example, two popular designs, the Marker Griffon 13 ID and Salomon Warden MNC, can be adjusted to fit all of the sole types listed above. This comes with a simple benefit to skiers: you can ski multiple set-ups with one boot. To help navigate this somewhat messy world, we’ve included a “sole compatibility” spec in our product descriptions and comparison table above. And a final note: the sole types described here cover a good portion of the market, but there are a few outliers (Dynafit’s Hoji Pro Tour Boot, for example). The takeaway is that you’ll want to really do your research prior to purchasing both your boots and bindings. 

Marker Griffon ID ski binding (sliding AFD plate)
The Marker Griffon's sliding AFD plate accommodates a variety of boot soles

Brake Width

Sometimes the small details can bite you in choosing ski gear, so make sure not to overlook the brake width of your bindings. There will often be a number of sizes to choose from (listed in millimeters) for a particular model, and it’s a good idea to get a width that closely matches the waist width of your skis—part of the reason it’s always a good idea to select your skis prior to picking a binding. There are no hard and fast rules about what width to choose, but we recommend choosing one that is at a minimum the exact waist width of your skis (or not less than a few millimeters to allow a ski shop to bend the bars ever so slightly). On the flipside, you also want to avoid a brake that is too wide as it may drag if you’re carving on hardpack. The typical recommendation is to choose a binding that is no more than 10 to 15mm wider than your ski's waist.

Ski waist width and binding brake width
A binding's brake width should be only slightly wider than its ski's waist width

Stack (Stand) Height

The stack height—also referred to as stand height—of a binding refers to how high it sets your boot off the top of the ski. Just as some runners prefer max-cushioned shoes while others go barefoot, stack height can be a matter of preference, although in most cases we recommend a lower slung design. With a shorter stack height you get a better connection to the ski and the snow, improving control and stability on uneven terrain (interestingly, ski racers love a high stand height for better leverage). Stack height is often a few millimeters higher in the heel than the toe, and most bindings here hover in the low-to-mid 20-millimeter range. Frame-style bindings and KneeBinding’s designs have higher stack heights due to added tech underfoot (the Tyrolia Ambition above is 38mm), which is something to keep in mind when opting for these designs.

Ski bindings (profile of Look bindings on Rossignol skis)
In general, a lower stack height offers better feel and control

Ski Binding Weight

The weight of a binding is typically not a serious consideration for resort skiers. Most bindings with a 12 or higher DIN rating come in around 5 pounds for the set, thanks to a sturdy spring in the heel, long-lasting plastic and metal, and advanced safety systems that reduce the risk of pre-release and injury. Bindings with lower DINs are often lighter given their less tech-heavy designs. A heavy set-up can be a pain to haul around from the car to the lodge or when hiking into the sidecountry, but it’s widely accepted that the tradeoff in performance and durability is worth it. On the other hand, weight is a far more important consideration for backcountry skiers, which is why we see bindings like the Salomon S/Lab Shift MNC clocking in a bit lower (3 lbs. 14.4 oz.).

Carrying skis in resort (binding weight)
For resort skiing, the performance of a heavier binding is worth the weight

Hybrid Touring Bindings

A growing number of bindings can accommodate a wide range of ski boot soles (including GripWalk, WTR, and touring designs), but this versatility does not mean you get uphill capability. Sure, you can pair them with your touring boot, but most of these bindings (such as the Marker Griffon 13) can still only go downhill. However, within this multi-norm (Marker’s branding is dubbed “Sole.ID”) category there are a few innovative hybrid designs that get the job done both on the ascent and the descent, which is great news for skiers who want to use one set-up for both frontcountry and backcountry travel.

The Salomon S/Lab Shift is the headliner of the hybrid binding department, featuring an innovative toe design with two modes. You get a pin binding for uphill travel—functional with a tech boot only—and in ski mode the pins are replaced by an alpine toe piece (compatible with many boot styles). With excellent elasticity and power transfer, the Shift is a legitimate one-quiver tech binding that truly performs while lapping the resort. Marker’s Duke PT offers similar versatility, and the unique CAST Freetour Kit also gives you the option to swap between an alpine binding (Look’s Pivot) and a tech toe. Given the excitement around the concept and increased backcountry interest in general, we fully expect to see more dual-compatibility tech options hit the market in the future.

Ski Bindings (Salomon Shift)
Touring in the innovative Salomon S/Lab Shift bindings

Pre-Packaged Deals on Skis and Bindings

If you’re new to the sport or haven’t made a purchase in a while, you’ll notice that ski listings fall into two general groups: expensive skis that do not include bindings and pre-packaged ski and binding combos. The benefit of choosing a pre-packed set-up is value: you can find a 10-DIN binding and ski for $500 or less. The downside should be obvious considering the cost: they’re not as good in terms of quality, particularly as you improve your skiing abilities. If you fall into the advancing intermediate category or above, we recommend purchasing your bindings and skis separately in most cases. (Editor’s note: what we consider to be a pre-packaged ski and binding set-up does not include a select number of high-end packages offered from retailers like Evo and, which often include the bindings we have listed above).

Resort skiing in Crested Butte
Pre-packaged ski/binding combos are a great way to gear up for cheap

For beginners or those that are looking to save money, the pre-packaged models are plenty capable for having fun on a blue square run at the resort. To see our full list of recommended designs, check out our article on the best beginner skis. And to complete the set-up, we’ve also detailed the best ski boots for beginners.

Matching Your Bindings to Skis and Boots

Realistically, bindings will be towards the end of your ski gear search. The flashy and fun stuff is the skis themselves, so get that part squared away before moving to boots and bindings. Outside of the basic compatibility issues between boots and bindings that we touched on above, it’s important to choose a set-up with all parts complementing one another. Don’t throw a low-DIN binding on a heavy downhill-focused ski—it’s just a waste of a lot of cool technology (and cash). Similarly, you’ll probably want to steer clear of pairing a high-end binding with an ultralight touring ski that isn't powerful or stable enough for carving. To help in the process, see our top picks for all-mountain skis and downhill boots.

Ski bindings (adjusting Technica Machl MV 130 ski boot)
It's worth the time and effort to get a good match between boots, bindings, and skis

Ordering Bindings Online

When ordering skis and bindings online, it’s important to understand that most of the time the bindings will not arrive mounted. If you have a local ski shop or order from a retailer like REI, it’s as simple as paying to get the bindings mounted on the skis. The typical cost is around $40 to $70, but REI will do the work for $25 if you purchase from them (this is the current price at the REI Flagship in Seattle and it does vary by store). If you do not have a local shop, the only online retailer that we’re aware of that does the work prior to shipping is (this requires you to purchase the skis, boots, and bindings all at once). While it isn’t ideal to then have the set-up shipped to you, it’s a nice way of avoiding the exorbitant costs of having the work done at the resort.
Back to Our Top Ski Binding Picks  Back to Our Ski Binding Comparison Table

Powered by Drupal

Best Downhill Ski Boots of 2021-2022

No matter your ability level, a comfortable boot is an absolute necessity. Nothing ruins a good powder day faster than cold or painful feet, and ill-fitting boots also run the risk of not properly transferring energy...

Salomon S/Lab Shift MNC Binding Review

Most ski bindings fall into either the downhill or alpine touring category, but the Salomon S/Lab Shift MNC is a do-it-all set-up that can confidently transition between the front- and backcountry...

Best All-Mountain Skis of 2021-2022

If you're searching for that elusive one-ski quiver, this is the category to find it. The definition of “all-mountain” varies by manufacturer and retailer but typically includes skis from 80 to 105...

Best Ski Jackets of 2021-2022

Choosing the right ski jacket is all about managing the conditions that you might encounter on the mountain. This depends on the specific kinds of skiing you enjoy most—skinning up a sunny ridgeline in the North Cascades is far different than bracing...

Arc’teryx Sabre AR Jacket Review

Arc’teryx offers an extensive lineup of quality ski jackets, from technical hardshells to insulated resort options. The Sabre AR (for “All Round”) slots in right in the middle, with a premium Gore-Tex build...

How to Stay Warm While Skiing

There’s a lot to love about resort skiing: you can cram in a ton of runs per day, always have the convenience of a lodge nearby, and don’t have to hoof it up thousands of vertical feet to earn your turns. That said, the biggest challenge with skiing...

Best Backcountry (Touring) Skis of 2021-2022

Unlike their lift-assisted alpine cousins, backcountry skis have two jobs: getting you uphill efficiently while retaining enough power to make the downhill worth the effort (and fun). The good news is...