Best Running Shoes of 2025

Running is among the most approachable forms of fitness, requiring only a pair of quality shoes to get you going. But the sport’s widespread popularity has led to a dizzying array of shoe brands, styles, and available features. Below, we break down our favorite running shoes, which cover everything from cushioned long-distance models to durable daily trainers and ultralight kicks for serious racing. We tested these shoes in a variety of different conditions, from 50K races to tempo training runs, and after months of research and hundreds of miles pounding the pavement, we have a streamlined list of 17 worthy models with the Brooks Ghost 17 landing at the top. For more background information, check out our comparison table and buying advice below the picks, along with details about our testing process. And for off-road excursions, see our article on the best trail running shoes.

Editor's note: We updated this guide on October 9, 2025, to swap several shoes to their latest versions, including the Saucony Endorphin and Triumph and the Reebok FloatZig. We also added the Salomon Aero Glide 3 GRVL, Altra Experience Flow 2, Nike Pegasus 41, and Mount to Coast R1 to our lineup. Finally, we removed discontinued models and swept the guide to ensure accuracy at the time of publishing.
 

Our Team's Running Shoe Picks

• Best Overall Running Shoe: Brooks Ghost 17
• Best Budget Running Shoe: Brooks Launch 11
• Best Everyday Trainer: Saucony Triumph 23
• Best Gravel Shoe: Salomon Aero Glide 3 GRVL
• Best Stability Shoe: Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24
• Best Road-to-Trail Shoe: Saucony Peregrine 15
• Maximum Cushion for Recovery Runs: Hoka Bondi 9
• Best for Race Day: Nike Alphafly 3

Best Overall Running Shoe

1. Men's Brooks Ghost 17 & Women's Brooks Ghost 17 ($150)

Category: Daily training 
Weight per pair: 1 lb. 4.2 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 2 oz. (women's)
Cushioning: 37mm (heel)/27mm (forefoot)
What we like: Versatile, comfortable, and efficient for everything from one-mile repeats to recovery runs.
What we don’t: A little lacking in breathability; slightly heavier than the prior version.

Our top pick of the year—Brooks' Ghost 17—is a versatile everyday training shoe that works as well for tempo runs as it does for recovery runs and hill climbs. The 17 comes with more midsole cushioning (37/27 for the 17 compared to 35/23.5 for the 16), adding height and spring with the DNA Loft v3 midsole. The latest design did add just over an ounce from version 16 (1 lb. 4.2 oz. compared to 1 lb. 3 oz.), but the difference is nominal considering the extra cushion. The drop also decreased from 12 millimeters to 10 millimeters—more aligned with a standard road shoe. Brooks uses a strong rubber for the outsole for improved durability, and we've noticed no degradation on our test models. They did a nice overhaul to the upper design, too, including a robust but flexible mesh that's still nicely padded through the tongue and heel collar. Overall, we experienced a very natural stride with an energetic liftoff and well-cushioned landing in our testing.

We don't have many complaints about the Ghost 17's performance, and we were happy to have a less extreme drop from the 16, which some runners found clunky and tippy underfoot. We will say these shoes don't breathe super well in hot weather, although the upside is that the mesh upper is pretty hardwearing and abrasion-resistant. Overall, this versatile shoe performs well for a variety of paces, distances, and terrain—and we certainly don't mind the freshly modernized look—keeping it in our top spot for 2025.
See the Men's Brooks Ghost 17  See the Women's Brooks Ghost 17
 

Best Budget Running Shoe

2. Men's Brooks Launch 11 & Women's Brooks Launch 11 ($120)

Category: Daily training
Weight per pair: 15.4 oz. (men's), 14.2 oz. (women's)
Cushioning: 35.5mm (heel)/27.5mm (forefoot)
What we like: Great quality and durability for less than most competitors.
What we don’t: Not our first choice for long runs; a bit narrow around the midfoot.

We generally steer clear of "budget" shoes, but the Brooks Launch 11 has impressed us on multiple fronts while undercutting most competitors by at least $20. The latest update shaved just over an ounce from the 10 but increased the price by $10, making it less of a steal. Brooks also tweaked the drop and the outsole stack, adding to the midsole under both the heel and toe and decreasing the drop from 10 to 8 millimeters for a slightly more stable stride. While not the most responsive midsole foam, the lightweight DNA cushioning with foot-mapped density offers decent energy return without excess bulk, making each stride feel relatively effortless. Combined with a snug-fitting mesh upper that's more breathable than past models, the shoe offers a surprisingly nimble feel that’s well-suited for quick-paced runs. They also added more robust RoadTack rubber to the outsole this year, which should hold up better than previous versions. 

That said, the Launch 11 isn't without downsides. The mesh upper is relatively stiff out of the box and requires some breaking in. It's also still a little lacking in breathability, although, like the Ghost above, the advantage is that it holds up well over time. Additionally, some long-distance runners found the prior version's padding a bit lackluster on extended outings, particularly on harder surfaces. The added underfoot cushioning on the 11 helps, but we still think the shoe is best suited for shorter to mid-distance training runs. Finally, it's worth noting that wide-footed runners may find the toe box a bit narrow, especially around the midfoot. If the fit works for you, the latest Launch strikes us as very well-rounded for the price.
See the Men's Brooks Launch 11  See the Women's Brooks Launch 11

Best Everyday Trainer

3. Men's Saucony Triumph 23 & Women's Saucony Triumph 23 ($170)

Category: Daily training 
Weight per pair: 1 lb. 2.4 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 0.8 oz. (women's)
Cushioning: 37mm (heel)/27mm (forefoot)
What we like: Excellent cushioning and good energy return.
What we don’t: Tall stack height is a little polarizing.

Maximum-cushioned shoes have taken the running world by storm over the past several years, and we've become big fans. Among the myriad options, Saucony's well-padded, recently updated Triumph 23 strikes an excellent balance between comfort and energy return. These shoes reduce fatigue on recovery days while feeling springy and responsive during tempo runs. The most recent update reduced the weight of the men's pair by nearly 2 ounces, enhancing excellent impact absorption without compromising momentum. Saucony also added their proprietary "Super Responsive Sockliner" to this year's update: a thin layer of foam in the insert that boosts responsiveness and energy return even more.

Another reason the Triumph has so much cushioning without lag is partially thanks to Saucony's "PWRRUN PB" midsole, a beaded foam made from a blend of PEBA polymers and touted as having better energy return and durability than standard EVA. While it's hard to substantiate these claims, we came away impressed by the shoes' nimble and sprightly personality during testing. The tall stack height won't be for everyone, and the Triumph did increase in cost by $10 this year, putting it $20 more than our top-rated Brooks Ghost. But if a cushy and responsive ride is what you're after, the Triumph 23 has a lot going for it.
Read more: Saucony Triumph review (previous women's version)
See the Men's Saucony Triumph 23  See the Women's Saucony Triumph 23
 

Best Gravel Shoe

4. Men's Salomon Aero Glide 3 GRVL & Women's Aero Glide 3 GRVL ($160)

Category: Gravel
Weight per pair: 1 lb. 3.4 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 0.6 oz. (women's)
Cushioning: 40mm (heel)/32mm (forefoot)
What we like: Lightweight, efficient shoes optimized for dirt and gravel without losing efficiency on pavement.
What we don’t: Sizing runs a little long; a gravel shoe isn't the most necessary piece of footwear.

That's right, we now have a gravel-specific shoe in the lineup, and it's not a total anomaly. The past few seasons have seen several new gravel-specific models hitting the market, offering a go-between for runners looking for a shoe that performs well on pavement, gravel roads, and in-town trails. Similar to the idea of a gravel bike, gravel shoes take the lightweight build of a road shoe and add burlier outsole traction for in-between runs where you leave the road but aren't on a fully technical trail. The Salomon Aero Glide 3 GRVL is our top pick in this category, with a sock-like upper fit and a tall midsole that feels light and springy on both fast workouts and longer gravel and dirt-road runs. Based on Salomon's Aero Glide 3 road runner, the Aero Glide 3 GRVL is reinforced with an outsole designed for rougher surfaces, complete with foot-mapped traction and lean, multi-directional chevron-shaped lugs.

Coming in at 1 pound 3.4 ounces for the men's pair (1 lb. 0.6 oz. for the women's), these shoes are competitively lightweight and have excellent underfoot cushion without losing forward momentum. We find them to run a little on the long side, and our tester actually went down a half size for a better fit. Aside from these fit issues, the main downside is that a gravel shoe isn't totally necessary. A lightweight pair of trail shoes or beefier road shoes will do the trick for most gravel runs, but we've been loving the optimized performance and not having to choose between the efficiency of a road shoe and the traction of a trail shoe for light trails and dirt.
See the Men's Salomon Aero Glide 3 GRVL  See the Women's Salomon Aero Glide 3 GRVL
 

Best Stability Shoe

5. Men's Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 & Women's Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 ($140)

Category: Daily training
Weight per pair: 1 lb. 4.0 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 1.6 oz. (women's)
Cushioning: 35.5mm (heel)/23.5mm (forefoot)
What we like: A well-rounded stability shoe that's great even for those who aren't prone to overpronation.
What we don’t: Not the lightest or most modern design.

The Brooks Adrenaline surprised us—in a good way. This stable, versatile shoe feels a bit like old-fashioned road runners but is notably lighter and peppier. Designed for stability (the GTS stands for "Go-To Support"), even our non-pronating tester liked the added structure and subtle medial post that's intended to correct excessive inward movement. We were also impressed by the shoes' all-around comfort, including great shock absorption and more substantial collar padding than what you get with alternatives like the On Cloudsurfer and Hoka Bondi below. 

As far as drawbacks go, the Brooks Adrenaline—like most stability shoes—is a little heavier than some competitors due to its added structure and support, although it's still competitive with the likes of Brooks' own Ghost 17 above and many others below. The design is also a little dated in both look and feel, and it falls into a bit of an in-between spot—for those looking to cover long distances, we'd recommend checking out the lighter Hoka Clifton; for race day, something like the Nike Alphafly offers better energy return. But this is telling: We found ourselves reaching for the Adrenaline over and over due to its well-rounded traction and comfort on a wide range of surfaces. For a deeper dive on stability shoes, check out our buying advice section below.
See the Men's Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24  See the Women's Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24
 

Best Road-to-Trail Shoe

6. Men's Saucony Peregrine 15 & Women's Saucony Peregrine 15 ($145)

Category: Trail
Weight per pair: 1 lb. 3.4 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 1.2 oz. (women's)
Cushioning: 28mm (heel)/24mm (forefoot)
What we like: A versatile trail shoe that can be worn comfortably on any terrain.
What we don’t: Can feel a little tight in the toe box at first.

The perennial favorite Peregrine is an excellent choice for a range of terrain and run lengths, with some of the best traction of any shoe we tested. We had confident foot plants on climbs, and the deep lugs allowed for fast, fun downhills. We wouldn't call this a particularly well-cushioned shoe (especially compared to Saucony's own Triumph above and Hoka's Bondi and Clifton below), but the 28-millimeter heel stack was enough to keep us feeling fresh and bouncy without deadening the stride sensation. Plus, the minimal, 4-millimeter drop allowed our feet to land naturally and find a good rhythm. Overall, the Peregrine does a lot of things well and makes a great crossover option for runs that involve a mix of pavement, gravel, and dirt.

The Saucony Peregrine isn’t the most flexible shoe on the market, and we found it to feel tight at first. While it loosens up over time, Saucony’s own Xodus 4 is another good road-to-trail option, with a roomier toe box and more flexible feel out of the box (though it will cost you more). Finally, while overall breathability is decent, the Asics Novablast 5 below and Saucony Triumph 23 above feel less "built up" and kept our feet cooler. But if you're looking for a shoe that has enough durability and protection for trail use without feeling too laggy on the road, the Peregrine strikes a really nice middle ground.
See the Men's Saucony Peregrine 15  See the Women's Saucony Peregrine 15
 

Maximum Cushion for Recovery Runs

7. Men's Hoka Bondi 9 & Women's Hoka Bondi 9 ($175)

Category: Daily training
Weight per pair: 1 lb. 5.0 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 2.6 oz. (women's)
Cushioning: 42mm (heel)/37mm (forefoot)
What we like: A true pillow for your feet and surprisingly spry.
What we don’t: Not the fastest or most stable ride; on the heavier end.

When you picture a Hoka shoe, chances are the maximalist Bondi is what comes to mind. The most cushioned shoe in Hoka's lineup, the Bondi 9 provides a whopping 42 millimeters of padding at the heel and 37 millimeters at the forefoot, resulting in class-leading impact absorption with every step. Like many runners, we’ll admit that we were initially skeptical of the Bondi’s polarizing appearance—that is, until we hit the pavement. After a very short acclimation period, the Bondi proved to be an incredibly comfortable ride at our slow-and-steady pace—great for recovery runs and keeping nagging injuries at bay—and even felt surprisingly agile at speed. In fact, we loved it so much that we found ourselves frequently reaching for the Bondi over our more aggressive flats. 

If there's one shoe that feels like walking on a cloud, this is it. But while the Bondi 9 is surprisingly well-rounded, it’s important to acknowledge that max-cushioned shoes have some inherent limitations. Some runners will find the oversized platform decidedly unstable, and the taller stack height and limited ground feel mean less stability when turning or pivoting. Further, at 1 pound 5 ounces for the men's pair, the Bondi 9 is on the heavier side, so don’t expect to be setting any course records. But for a shoe that will absorb most of the road’s impact before it hits your foot, we have very little to complain about. 
See the Men's Hoka Bondi 9  See the Women's Hoka Bondi 9 
 

Best for Race Day

8. Men's Nike Alphafly 3 & Women's Nike Alphafly 3 ($295)

Category: Speed
Weight per pair: 15.4 oz. (men's), 12.2 oz. (women's)
Cushioning: 40mm (heel)/32mm (forefoot)
What we like: Purpose-built for moving fast.
What we don’t: Very expensive, narrowly specialized, and doesn't hold up well to long-term use.

Nike's specialized Alphafly 3 is well known among marathon racers, and we found it to work well as a long-distance tempo shoe (or even a shorter-distance racing shoe), as well. At under a pound for the pair, the Alphafly feels otherworldly light underfoot, and the full-length carbon fiber plate does a great job maximizing stability while keeping weight to a minimum. The ZoomX foam used in the midsole is another highlight, effectively increasing energy return better than any other shoe we tested, and the mesh upper is great at keeping air moving—critical for race-day performance when preventing overheating is a must.

But let us be clear: This specialized shoe isn't for everyone and certainly wouldn't be our first choice for daily training. First and foremost, it’s quite expensive at $295, making the Alphafly the most expensive option on our list by a wide margin. It's also highly specialized, leading to a wobbly, uncomfortable, and cumbersome feel underfoot anytime that speed wasn't our primary objective. And due to their streamlined and minimalist build, the shoes don't hold up particularly well, especially if you venture off the pavement—our pair is showing excessive wear along the outsole after just a handful of miles. In other words, the Alphafly isn't a quiver-of-one design, but if you have the restraint to reserve them exclusively for race day, the shoe is sure to impress. 
See the Men's Nike Alphafly 3  See the Women's Nike Alphafly 3
 

Other Running Shoes We Love

9. Men's Nike Pegasus 41 & Women's Nike Pegasus 41 ($145)

Category: Daily training 
Weight per pair: 1 lb. 3.6 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 1.8 oz. (women's)
Cushioning: 37mm (heel)/27mm (forefoot)
What we like: A neutral-feeling, nicely aligned shoe we can almost forget we're wearing.
What we don’t: Somewhat shallow toebox for higher-volume feet.

Long a road-running staple, the Nike Pegasus has been around for as many seasons as we can remember. With an updated stack height to match today's max-cushioned styles, the 41 provides a well-cushioned heel that feels excellent during fast downhills and a rockered shape that helps propel you uphill. We would describe the Nike Pegasus 41 as fun: it's easy to wear and versatile, with a good balance of cushioning and rebound. Nike's ReactX midsole is built with injection-molded foam that avoids the too-soft feel of other similarly built compounds, and has a nice rebound for tempo runs and hill repeats.

The Pegasus truly feels like a neutral shoe, which helps explain why it's lasted so long on the market. The alignment and stability feel perfectly supportive, with a locked-in feel that's secure enough for you to almost forget you're wearing them. The 10-millimeter drop is more dramatic than others on this list, similar in shape to the On Cloudsurfer below, but with less of a compressed feel under the toe. 27 millimeters of toe cushion can sometimes feel inadequate during long runs, but we haven't noticed any additional forefoot fatigue in the Pegasus. The fit feels mostly accurate, although the toe box does feel a little shallow, so people with higher-volume feet should consider going up a half size for more toe splay. 
See the Men's Nike Pegasus 41  See the Women's Nike Pegasus 41

10. Men's Altra Experience Flow 2 & Women's Altra Experience Flow 2 ($140)

Category: Daily training
Weight per pair: 1 lb. 0.3 oz. (men's), 14.1 oz (women's)
Cushioning: 32mm (heel)/28mm (forefoot)
What we like: Roomy toe box is great for comfort; 4mm drop helps promote a natural gait without losing efficiency.
What we don’t: The extended heel tab feels a bit extreme.

Altra has continued to expand its line of road-running shoes over the past few seasons, and the Experience Flow 2 handily displaced our formerly listed Torin 8 this year. At 4 ounces lighter than the Torin with a zippier underfoot feel and a sock-like fit, the Experience Flow 2 is an easy-running shoe with a moderate 4-millimeter heel-to-toe drop that aids in propulsion without feeling unnatural. The upper is airy and breathable, using a majority mesh build with minimal overlays. Overall, this is an incredibly streamlined shoe, which is a nice change considering we've seen some overly built-up models since Altra began expanding beyond their original zero-drop trail shoes. Not the case here—the Experience Flow 2 is a highly cushioned shoe that doesn't feel unnecessarily squishy, with a sleek upper, grippy outsole, and light reinforcements around the lacing system.

The elongated heel tab on the Experience Flow is similar to the Hoka Clifton 10 below, which we feel is somewhat overdone, but otherwise, there aren't many questionable choices here. We've seen reports of an oddly pinching upper material on the toes, but our test pair fits well and has proven to be a lightweight, springy ride with a comfortable fit and top-notch energy return. We'll be curious to see how the upper holds up during the upcoming season, but we haven't noticed any undue wear thus far, and Altra fans will love the brand's wide toe box in the shoe's lightweight build. 
See the Men's Altra Experience Flow 2  See the Women's Altra Experience Flow 2

11. Men's Hoka Clifton 10 & Women's Hoka Clifton 10 ($155)

Category: Daily training 
Weight per pair: 1 lb. 3.6 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 1.6 oz. (women's)
Cushioning: 41mm (heel)/33mm (forefoot)
What we like: Excellent cushioning at a competitively low weight.
What we don’t: Some will find the design unstable; recent update added a couple ounces.

Few shoes have caused such a stir in the road running community as Hoka's flagship pavement crusher: the Clifton. Now in its 10th iteration, the shoe has remained a staff favorite since 2015 and thankfully adopted a more subdued, mainstream appearance since its inception (it used to be the "clown shoe" of the running world). Despite its streamlined silhouette, the Clifton's strong suits remain the same: standout long-distance comfort at a competitively low weight. The shoe performed as advertised during our tests, delivering a highly cushioned but responsive ride, cementing its place as one of the best lightweight daily trainers on the market.

With the latest update, Hoka increased the Clifton's drop from 5 to 8 millimeters and the stack height from 32 to 41 millimeters at the heel. Lack of stability has always been an issue with these shoes, and we fear the recent changes will only worsen the problem. While testing the 9, one of our editors felt the combination of tall stack height and relatively narrow platform to be too tippy for anything other than the smoothest, straightest sections of pavement. Those with weak ankles should be wary, and even runners used to neutral shoes will want to factor in a break-in period before tackling any serious mileage. Taken together, the Clifton may lack the widespread appeal of some options here, but it soaks up the miles better than most.
See the Men's Hoka Clifton 10  See the Women's Hoka Clifton 10

12. Men's Saucony Endorphin Speed 5 & Women's Endorphin Speed 5 ($175)

Category: Speed
Weight per pair: 1 lb. 0.6 oz. (men's), 14.4 oz. (women's)
Cushioning: 36mm (heel)/28mm (forefoot)
What we like: Excellent stability with a bouncy feel that doesn't lose grounding.
What we don’t: Ttongue tends to bunch up.

While not quite competitive enough to make our podium, Saucony's Endorphin Speed 5 stands out for its impressive balance of speed and plush cushioning. With its lightweight design and responsive PWRRUN PB cushioning (shared with their Triumph 23 above), this shoe is well-suited for both tempo runs and race day. Additionally, the mesh upper offers a nice combination of breathability and a secure fit, adapting well to various foot shapes while providing ample support around the collar and tongue. The recent update from the 4 to the 5 added a barely-there .02 ounces to the total weight, accounting for expanded heel rubber with more durability. 

This shoe maintains a remarkable level of responsiveness, making it suitable for interval training and long runs alike. Additionally, the rubber outsole is grippy over a wide variety of surfaces, instilling confidence even in wet conditions. Instead of a carbon plate like the even lighter Endorphin Pro, the Endorphin Speed uses a semi-rigid nylon plate between the foam midsole layers, which creates a snappy ride and excellent propulsion. Very few cons arose during testing, although we did experience a bit of bunching around the flimsy-feeling tongue. It landed lower on our list simply because it's a fast shoe that doesn't have the same all-around appeal as the Triumph 23, but the Endorphin Speed is a great all-rounder for those looking to train and race in the same shoe, or for athletes on the hunt for an interval shoe without a carbon plate.
See the Men's Saucony Endorphin Speed 5  See the Women's Saucony Endorphin Speed 5

13. Men's Asics Novablast 5 & Women's Asics Novablast 5 ($150)

Category: Speed
Weight per pair: 1 lb. 2.0 oz. (men's), 25.8 oz. (women's)
Cushioning: 41.5mm (heel)/33.5mm (forefoot)
What we like: Lightweight comfort and excellent rebound for tempo runs.
What we don’t: Unstable landing on slower-paced runs; heel stack can feel unwieldy. 

At 41.5 millimeters at the heel and 33.5 millimeters at the forefoot, the Novablast 5 is among the taller shoes on our list, bested only by Hoka's latest updates. Utilizing Asics' FF Blast Max foam technology, the cushioned landings kept us fresh on everything from race-pace 5Ks to mile repeats, and Asics made good on their promise of high energy return. In fact, the Novablast has some of the best rebound among shoes we've tested, comparable to the springy Saucony Triumph above. And in line with the shoes' focus on speed, we appreciate that the upper is noticeably airy.

Despite the Novablast's excellent rebound and cushioning, we came away with enough complaints to rank it mid-pack on our list. Our biggest issue was how unnatural it felt on recovery runs: While the shoes are great for racing and tempo runs, we found stability to be noticeably lacking and had a hard time maintaining a consistent footstrike at slower speeds. The heel cushioning felt more cumbersome than springy at these paces as well, and our toes felt like they were taking the brunt of the impact on longer runs. Finally, the outsole is starting to show considerable wear after about 50 miles, which doesn't bode well for long-term durability. Taken together, the Novablast is far from the most well-rounded option here, but nevertheless has its place for speed work.
See the Men's Asics Novablast 5  See the Women's Asics Novablast 5

 14. Men's Reebok FloatZig 2 & Women's Reebok FloatZig 2 ($120)

Category: Daily training
Weight per pair: 1 lb. 4.8 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 1.6 oz. (women's)
Cushioning: 33mm (heel)/27mm (forefoot)
What we like: A responsive, stable shoe at a great price.
What we don’t: Midsole isn't particularly plush.

Reebok debuted its Floatride foam more than a decade ago and has continued to refine the design, resulting in a light, flexible, yet stable platform with efficient energy return. The FloatZig 2 is this year's update, carrying the torch with a nice balance of stiffness and cushion and providing a consistently smooth and responsive ride for both long and short runs. The latest shoe increased the stack height by 2 millimeters under the heel and toe, keeping the moderate 6-millimeter drop but upping the cushioning. The weight did increase by 1.2 ounces per men's pair, tipping the FloatZig 2 out of the lighter end of the lineup but still allowing them to feel breathable and efficient. 

However, while we like the density of Reebok's foam, the FloatZig 2 is slightly stiffer and less plush than alternatives like the Asics Novablast 5 and Saucony Endorphin Speed 5 above—both of which are several ounces lighter. Some users also report a relatively short midsole lifespan, although we haven't noticed any packing out or flattening despite extensive mileage. And the rest of the shoe is holding up equally well, from the outsole to the nicely reinforced upper. Overall, the FloatZig is a solid all-rounder at a competitive price, and we love the unique, retro styling that pairs well with casual clothes around town, making these a top choice for comfortable travel footwear. 
See the Men's Reebok FloatZig 2  See the Women's Reebok FloatZig 2

15. Men's New Balance Fresh Foam X 860v14 & Women's NB X 860v14 ($140)

Category: Daily training
Weight per pair: 1 lb. 5.6 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 1.4 oz. (women's)
Cushioning: 29mm (heel)/21mm (forefoot)
What we like: A supportive and well-rounded stability design for those prone to overpronating.
What we don’t: Doesn't excel in any one category.

The Fresh Foam X 860v14 is the latest model in a long line of New Balance stability shoes, which aim to improve the motion control of a runner's stride with added support and structure built into the shoe. Featuring a stability plane inserted into the midsole, the design effectively minimizes overpronation to prevent added stress on the feet and legs. The padded and gusseted tongue, well-cushioned ankle, airy mesh upper, and namesake Fresh Foam X midsole all work in concert to maximize support and long-distance comfort. And importantly, the cushioning feels quite even throughout the entire shoe—unlike the Asics Novablast 5 above, which is noticeably lacking in padding under the toes.

We found that the Fresh Foam X 860v14 does a lot of things well but doesn't stand out in any one area. The shoes showed very little wear after our testing period, but lack the sleek, modernized look of many competitors. We also found the cushioning to be a bit firmer than we'd prefer for easy runs on pavement, and the lack of energy return is notable (although the midsole does a good job absorbing impacts). After testing the New Balance alongside the Saucony Endorphin Speed 5 and Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 above, the slightly dull feeling stood out. But for runners prone to overpronating, the New Balance is another quality stability design to have on your radar.
See the Men's Fresh Foam X 860v14  See the Women's Fresh Foam X 860v14

16. Men's Mount to Coast R1 & Women's Mount to Coast R1 ($160)

Category: Road
Weight per pair: 1 lb. 1 oz. (men's), 1 lb. 1 oz. (women's)
Cushioning: 35mm (heel)/27mm (forefoot)
What we like: A lightweight, durable shoe with a reinforced midsole for stability and longevity.
What we don’t: Somewhat stiff underfoot; CPU outsole is squeaky on indoor floors. 

Relatively new on the scene, Mount to Coast shoes have been gaining popularity in the ultrarunning and distance scene thanks to their forgiving fit and lightweight durability. We've been loving the emphasis on stability through their contoured midsole, plus the breathable, abrasion-resistant jacquard upper that keeps us from overheating during hot runs. The Mount to Coast R1 is one of the brand's flagship shoes, landing on our list this year thanks to its combination of weight savings and durability. The shoe weighs just 1 pound, 1 ounce per pair, making it one of the lighter models in the guide. The R1 also has a somewhat unique outsole made from casting polyurethane (CPU), which is purported to have excellent grip and durability. Thus far, the shoes have overall proven to be exceptionally durable, especially given their low weight.

The R1 is still relatively new to us in testing, and the underfoot feel takes some getting used to. Mount to Coast lists this as a higher cushioned shoe, and while the 35-millimeter heel stack is fairly tall, the shoes don't have the plush feel of the Saucony Endorphin 5 above or the On Cloudsurfer 2 below. This isn't necessarily a bad thing, as the shoes are still light and bouncy, but runners accustomed to softer foam than Mount to Coast's Lightcell midsole should be aware of the difference. Mount to Coast still has a fairly limited lineup, but they've been building shoes specifically for ultras. Additionally, gravel runners might like the H1, while runners looking for a true stability shoe will appreciate the P1, with lateral rails for stride support.
See the Men's Mount to Coast R1  See the Women's Mount to Coast R1

17. Men's On Cloudsurfer 2 & Women's On Cloudsurfer 2 ($160)

Category: Daily training
Weight per pair: 1 lb. 2.4 oz. (men's), 16 oz. (women's)
Cushioning: 32mm (heel)/23mm (forefoot)
What we like: Lightweight with ample cushioning; redesigned midsole and outsole promise improved stability.
What we don’t: Recent update added a little weight; not particularly secure underfoot.

Last but not least, we have the On Cloudsurfer 2, a unique design with a significantly rockered build that's sure to stand out. This shoe grew on us in testing, especially when running in a straight line on flat terrain: The innovative CloudTec midsole is built to collapse sequentially through each part of the stride, providing a noticeably smooth takeoff and weight transfer. What's more, the upper is sleek and breathable with minimal overlays, and the shoes are competitively light at just over a pound for the pair. We've seen On shoes explode in popularity in recent years, and the Cloudsurfer makes it clear that the brand can hold its own in the highly competitive space.

The Cloudsurfer 2 still ranks last on our list, but On's recent updates should fix some of the issues we encountered last season. First, they revamped the cut-out midsole design to be less dramatic and refined the cushioning with a minor increase in padding under the toes (from 22mm to 23mm). The 2 also features a tightened tread design for more stability underfoot, which should help with the edges' propensity to collapse on impact. We still feel the shoe is best for easy runs on smooth surfaces, but we're hopeful about the recent changes and may adjust the Cloudsurfer 2's ranking once we've put more miles on the shoes.
See the Men's On Cloudsurfer 2  See the Women's On Cloudsurfer 2

Running Shoe Comparison Table

About Our Testing Process

Our list of running shoes underwent a significant overhaul in 2025, marking a major update since our last comprehensive update. Our team has been hitting the pavement (and gravel) with a range of road shoes, sprinkling in some hybrids and trail-focused models for good measure. Longtime contributor Sasha Brown put shoes to the test over hundreds of miles in North Vancouver, focusing primarily on longer-distance runs on the hilly streets and paths near her home as well as on flatter, coastal terrain. Lifelong runner Ben Stalheim also continues to contribute, testing a variety of shoes on everything from speedy 5K road races to longer recovery efforts and tempo workouts. Finally, editors Maggie Slepian and Chris Carter are avid runners with a combined 20 years of gear testing experience. Chris spends most of his time on trails in Chattanooga, Tennessee, with the occasional pavement run and road race mixed in, while Maggie is a 4-season runner who gets out several times a week on everything from pavement to gravel and high-elevation trail systems near her home in Bozeman, Montana.

Our current lineup of 17 running shoes reflects our firsthand experiences from ongoing testing, evaluating everything from initial fit and feel to durability over the course of nearly 1,000 combined testing miles on varied terrain. When we test running shoes, we analyze performance characteristics, from energy return through the midsole to stability in each phase of the stride. We also pay attention to key factors like comfort, responsiveness, heel-to-toe drop, impact absorption, and the quality of materials used, prioritizing designs that excel in multiple categories. We seek to test a range of shoes optimized for everything from races to recovery days and casual jaunts. As we continue to test running shoes, we’ll amend the list above to reflect our favorites. Finally, keep in mind that these shoes are primarily intended for road running and moderate gravel and dirt. For more technical trails, check out our article on the best trail running shoes.
 

Running Shoe Buying Advice

• Running Shoe Categories
• Cushioning and Stack Height
• Heel-to-Toe Drop
• Running Gait: Pronation
• Arch Support
• Neutral vs. Stability Shoes
• Running Shoe Weight
• Important Components of a Running Shoe
• Fit and Sizing
• Breathability
• Waterproofing
• Durability: How Long Should Running Shoes Last?
• Saving Money with Older Models
• Road vs. Trail Running Shoes

Running Shoe Categories

For an activity as simple as putting one foot in front of the other, the number of subdisciplines within the sport of running is surprising. Are you a serious runner who pushes PRs, logs tempo workouts, and competes in races? An every-so-often runner who likes to hit the pavement for a few leisurely miles at a time? Or perhaps you’re a distance jogger who competes in the odd marathon. Regardless of your style, you’ll want to choose the right running shoe for the job. To help, we break down running shoes into three main categories: daily training, racing, and trail.
 

Remember that choosing the right running shoe is be a subjective process. A runner who tends to overpronate might choose a stability shoe like the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 as their daily trainer, while someone prioritizing a higher cushion might opt for the max-cushioned Hoka Bondi 9. Our delineations are meant to be a helpful guideline, but don’t limit yourself too much. There’s simply no substitute for trying a shoe on in person and taking the time to understand your preferences (be patient, this might take a few hundred miles). And once you land on a shoe that works for you, it’s likely you’ll stick with that same model or subsequent iterations for many seasons.

Daily Training 
Daily training shoes are the ideal choice for those looking for a day-in, day-out trainer or a cushioned ride for recovery runs. These shoes aren’t designed to break Strava course records or distance PRs, but they’re comfortable, well priced, and provide a great combination of responsiveness and support for most runners. Perhaps most importantly, shoes in our daily training category are durable, featuring resilient midsoles that bounce back after a beating, generous outsole rubber, and builds that can handle 400+ miles of wear and tear. We’ve also snuck a few budget models into this category, which will sacrifice a bit of comfort and/or durability for a lower price tag. The Saucony Triumph 23 and Brooks Ghost 17 are two of our favorite daily training shoes and will get the job done for the majority of recreational runners.
 

Speed
Shoes in our speed category are purpose-built for those who want to travel fast, whether in training, during a race, or while attempting a PR. Most of these shoes feature new technologies like a nitrogen-infused midsole or carbon/TPU plate, both of which are advertised to help propel your foot forward with each step. Look for streamlined uppers, midsoles, and outsoles, with an emphasis on shaving weight for unburdened movement. As a result, speed shoes aren’t the most durable options, lack some comfort (especially for wide or swollen feet), and are generally stiffer and less cushioned than most. They’re also expensive, often costing around $170 or more (carbon-plated designs like the Nike Alphafly are even pricier). The Saucony Endorphin Speed 5 is one of our favorite speed shoes of the year, providing impressive power from its nylon plate yet still offering cushion and support for long-distance comfort.
 

Trail and Gravel
Our trail running shoe round-up covers our top picks for those who don't frequently hit pavement, but we'd be remiss not to mention some of our favorites that cross over well for use on mixed surfaces. This year, the versatile Saucony Peregrine 15 made the cut, offering deeper traction and more rugged upper materials for trail miles. The Peregrine (and close second Saucony Xodus) will perform on the road in a pinch, though running over pavement will quickly wear down their tread. Trail running shoes are generally more durable than road runners, have much more aggressive outsoles, and can fall on the heavier end of the spectrum. We also added the Salomon Aero Glide 3 GRVL as a top gravel shoe this year, which is an in-between for people pounding pavement as well as dirt roads and gravel paths. If you are just getting into running and aren't sure whether you prefer road or trail, a crossover or gravel shoe could be a good idea. They are also great for road-to-trail objectives, where you might start from your house and run to a trail, with multidirectional lugs that offer added traction for off-pavement miles without the sharp lugs that can be easily worn down. 
 

Cushioning and Stack Height

To determine underfoot cushioning, look for stack height: the measured height from where the foot sits inside the shoe to the ground at both the heel and forefoot. At the low end is a model like the New Balance Fresh Foam X 860v14 (29mm heel / 21 forefoot), while the Asics Novablast 5 (41.5/33.5mm) is at the other extreme. Most modern running shoes land somewhere around 30 to 34 millimeters at the heel, with max-cushioned designs becoming increasingly common.

There isn’t a perfect answer to determine ideal cushioning, although personal preference, running style, and preferred distance can point you in the right direction. Thin shoes typically are lighter, faster, and excel at short distances, although they can lead to foot soreness as the miles add up. Going the plush route aids in shock absorption and comfort for longer races or recovery days. Historically, you would lose some energy return with excess foam, but updates in foam technology and shoes with carbon plates have helped offset that trade-off significantly. In the end, most runners will be happiest somewhere in the middle. Popular designs like the Hoka Clifton 10 (41mm/33mm) and Saucony Triumph 23 (37mm/27mm) are well cushioned, versatile options with plenty of protection and comfort for daily training without compromising a peppy ride during races from 5Ks to marathons.
 

Heel-To-Toe Drop

Heel-to-toe drop describes the difference in shoe height from the heel to the toe. In theory, it’s not the flashiest of specs, but the dramatic growth of low- and zero-drop shoes (designs that are close to or equally tall at the heel and toe) over the past decade have put it on runners’ radars. Looking at our picks above, the spread ranges from 12 millimeters for a traditional design like the Brooks Adrenaline to low-drop options like the Hoka Bondi 9 (5mm) and zero-drop Altra Torin (not listed).

Our take on heel-to-toe drop is that if you’ve been comfortable with your traditional 8-millimeter-drop shoes for years, there’s little reason to experiment with a pair of zero-drop shoes. Injury prevention was one of the early calling cards of zero-drop, barefoot models like Xero Shoes, with the claim being that they encouraged a “natural” stride that resulted in a midfoot strike. But numerous studies, including this one from the American Journal of Sports Medicine, have failed to support it. That said, we know of plenty of runners who have found the switch to a zero-drop style a revelation in running comfort. Those folks commonly already have a midfoot or forefoot strike, so if that sounds like you, it might be worth making the switch. And if you do plan to run in a low-or zero-drop shoe, we recommend slowly transitioning with lower mileage and frequency to start. The aforementioned study showed that dedicated runners who went from a traditional to a low-drop shoe had a higher chance of injury, which can be mitigated by easing into the shift.
 

Running Gait: Pronation 

In order to find the best pair of shoes for you, it can be helpful to understand your running gait, which is largely determined by your style of pronation. Pronation describes the way in which your foot strikes the ground with each step and is easy to discern by examining the wear patterns on a used pair of shoes or popping into your local running shoe store for a test. In general, there are three main styles of pronation: neutral pronation, overpronation, and supination.

Neutral Pronation
To start, neutral pronation means you go through the following cycle: Your feet hit the ground and roll slightly inwards while the arch flattens (for visual learners, this chart from Asics is helpful). This is considered a natural running and walking style, as the inward rotation helps with shock absorption while keeping your body comfortably aligned. One helpful indicator that you have this type of gait is wear patterns on old shoes that are even across the forefoot and lightly worn on the outside heel. Most running shoes are made for neutral pronators (including the majority of shoes on our list—see the “support” column in our comparison table above), which means they provide no extra support on the inside of the foot.
 

Overpronation
Next up is overpronation, which is when the ankle rotates heavily inwards. Runners with this type of gait often (but not always) have flat feet and will see wear patterns along the insides of their shoes at both the heel and forefoot. Historically, overpronators were advised to purchase a stability/motion control shoe or invest in an aftermarket insole. The rationale behind this is that the extra support and structure encourage your feet to mimic neutral pronation, thereby reducing the risk of injury. However, if you’re looking for conclusive, evidence-based research that this happens, you’ll come up empty. It’s true that many overpronating runners like the feel of a stability shoe, especially those that are fairly unobtrusive like the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 and New Balance Fresh Foam X 860v14. But it’s equally important to understand there isn’t a universal “perfect” gait, and overcorrecting with too much support also can be a potential recipe for injury.
 

Supination (Underpronation)
Finally, supination or underpronation is when the ankle rotates outwards while running. This is the least common gait style, but characteristics include feet with high arches and old shoes showing wear along the outer edges of the soles at the front and back. Similar to overpronation, it’s not a perfect science in finding an ideal shoe. That said, most runners with supination prefer a neutral style with a lot of flexibility. Shoes that fit the bill include the top-ranked Brooks Ghost 17.
 

Arch Support

As we mentioned above, the height of your arches is closely tied to pronation: In general, those with "normal" arches fall into the “neutral” pronation category, runners with flat feet or low arches have a tendency to overpronate, and high arches are associated with supination. However, whether or not you should base any portion of your buying decision on this information is up for debate. On one hand, Asics provides specific recommendations for those with flat/low, average, and high arches (with the caveat that “actual biomechanical needs vary from person to person”). On the other hand, the jury is still out on whether or not choosing shoes based on arch support reduces the risk of injury. Without solid evidence behind the benefits, it’s best to think of it as a personal, comfort-based decision. Further, runners who have consistent challenges finding a suitable pair of shoes will be best off meeting with a podiatrist for recommendations on foot strengthening, shoe types, or orthotic inserts.
 

Neutral vs. Stability Shoes

When purchasing a running shoe—especially in store—you’ll likely be faced with the question of if you need a neutral or stability shoe. In general, runners with a neutral gate (neutral pronation) or those who underpronate will want a neutral shoe (this is the core of the market), and those who overpronate will want a stability shoe. Motion control shoes provide the most support and are reserved for those with very flat feet or big overpronation issues. If this sounds like you, strength training and/or hiring a running coach to work on gait may also be beneficial. 
 

Neutral shoes are characterized by their flexible construction, some level of cushioning underfoot, and light weight. This wide-ranging category encompasses everything from ultralight race designs to heavier and cushier daily trainers, including a number of our top picks. Stability shoes, on the other hand, offer a step up in support compared with neutral options. These designs include some lateral stability—often in the form of a denser foam “post” along the inside of the shoe—to lightly correct a runner’s gait. Stability shoes are common choices for those who find neutral shoes tippy and uncomfortable, and a few of our top picks include the Brooks Adrenaline GTS 24 and New Balance Fresh Foam X 860v14. Finally, motion control shoes have extra stability integrated into the upper and midsole and stiffened-up heels, which makes them among the heaviest and slowest on the market. None of these made the list. 
 

Running Shoe Weight

Weight is among the most publicized specs for running shoes, and for good reason: A lighter shoe requires less effort, which adds up quickly over long distances. As such, it’s not surprising that the lightest shoes are designed for moving fast. Race-focused models like Nike Alphafly 3 tip the scales at just 15.4 ounces per pair, but the core of the market comes in a few ounces heavier and emphasizes longevity and comfort. Finally, the heaviest models include stability shoes like New Balance's 1-pound-5.6-ounce Fresh Foam X 860v14.

It's a good idea to have weight in mind when choosing your shoes, but it’s equally important not to look at that number in complete isolation. Choosing the lightest model would put you in a pair of race flats, which compromise overall comfort, durability, and traction in the name of speed. In the end, it’s best to use weight as one of many factors in determining your ideal pair of runners. 
 

Important Components of a Running Shoe

Upper
A shoe’s upper refers to the material(s) that wrap around the sides and top of your feet. Typically made out of a mesh or knit fabric, the goal is to balance flexibility with support and running comfort. We’ve found that quality uppers are fairly thin and have minimal overlays and seams to encourage breathability and trim weight. In addition, they’re made with soft materials that hold your feet without feeling restrictive or abrasive. For a daily training shoe, you’ll want to look for a more durable (read: thicker) upper, while speed-oriented shoes typically utilize more stripped-down designs.
 

Midsole
As the name indicates, a midsole is sandwiched between the removable insole and outsole at the bottom. Largely comprised of foam, the midsole plays a significant role in a shoe’s shock absorption, energy return, and all-around comfort. As such, it’s one of the flashiest and techiest parts of the shoe, featuring proprietary foams with names like “React,” “Fresh,” and “Boost.” Designs vary widely based on thickness, cushioning, and intended use—race / speed-oriented shoes are firmer, while trainers and long-distance shoes are often softer. Midsoles on daily runners prioritize durability, with resilient foam that bounces back fast and resists packing out. It’s a good idea to read up on a shoe’s midsole style to make sure it’s a good match for your running needs.
 

Outsole
The final piece is the sole or outsole of the shoe. Designs fall into two general categories: blown or carbon rubber. Starting with blown rubber, this is the lighter alternative that uses an air injection process to cut weight and retain a lot of flexibility and bounciness underfoot. Downsides are that the material isn’t very durable and doesn’t provide a lot of traction, especially in the wet. Because of this, blown rubber is commonly used around the forefoot and midfoot and rarely takes up the entirety of the exposed outsole. Carbon rubber is heavier and more rigid, but strategically placed panels of it boost longevity and grip in a variety of conditions.
 

The amount of traction a given shoe provides is one of the top considerations for trail runners, but it falls lower down the priority list for road use. That’s not to say that traction can’t come into play in certain situations on pavement. Some lightweight road shoes have overly simplified outsoles with too much blown rubber and exposed midsole foam, making them sketchy when running on wet surfaces or even when crossing painted lines on roads and crosswalks. On the other hand, Hoka's Challenger 8 (not listed) balances road and dirt needs with a combination of moderately deep lugs under the heel and forefoot and a max-cushioned midsole that's designed to absorb the impact of running on pavement.

Fit and Sizing

Nailing down fit and sizing is one of the more challenging parts of online shoe shopping, but there are some brand-specific generalizations that make it easier. Altra and Topo Athletic shoes consistently have a wide toe box and fairly generous midfoot, while Nikes are known to run pretty narrow, which can be an issue for those with high-volume feet. Hoka, Brooks, Saucony, and Asics often fall somewhere in the middle. Of course, there are variations within a brand based on the model—performance-oriented shoes often have a snugger, more streamlined cut, for example, which is why we call out our experiences with fit as often as possible in the product descriptions above.
 

One positive note in regard to sizing is that many models of running shoes—and road runners in particular—are made in an expansive range of lengths and widths. Take the women’s version of the Brooks Ghost 17, which is offered in sizes from 5 to 13 and a total of four widths (narrow, medium, wide, and extra wide). Further, some running brands have invested heavily in online tools for finding your ideal pair. One of our favorites is Brooks' Shoe Finder, which asks detailed questions about injury history, training goals, flexibility, and walking gait to provide specific shoe recommendations. 
 

Breathability

Running is a year-round activity, but the enthusiasm for getting out certainly ticks up in the warmer months. As such, manufacturers put a premium on temperature regulation on hot days. Far and away, the most significant factor for a shoe’s breathability is how well its upper materials release hot air and sweat. Logically, a thinner and more porous (read: mesh-heavy) upper performs best in the heat, while a thicker and more substantial material will run warm but help keep you protected on cold days (as well as hold up better over the long term). Overall, most of the shoes reviewed above offer plenty of breathability for running in the warmer months.

Waterproofing

No waterproof shoes made our list, with the reason being that most runners value breathability and quick drying time over the ability to seal out moisture. Unless you frequently run in slush or snow, our take is that you'll be better off saving weight with a non-waterproof shoe, which will inherently dry out quicker if submerged compared to a shoe with a waterproof membrane. That said, if you're looking for a dedicated winter running shoe or live in a particularly wet climate like the Pacific Northwest, several manufacturers make waterproof versions of their core models for an additional cost. For example, Brooks' Ghost is sold in a Gore-Tex version that costs $20 more than the non-waterproof model.
 

Durability: How Long Should Running Shoes Last?

One of the age-old running shoe questions is when to retire your beloved pair of trainers. And while there are a range of considerations, including your body weight, stride (heel strikers put more stress on the shoe), and terrain (pavement usually wears shoes down faster than dirt trails), there are some key guidelines to follow. To start, the loosely agreed-upon total mileage for when the midsole and cushioning of a quality running shoe should break down is in the 300 to 500 range. The factors mentioned above can swing that number to either end of the spectrum, and some minimalist racing flats have even shorter lifespans. Other indicators that it’s time to go shoe shopping are if you start developing new aches and pains in your knees, ankles, or feet, or if the shoe’s outsole is wearing down.
 

Saving Money with Older Models

Most of the shoes listed above are the most recent editions (at the time of publishing) that are widely available through various online retailers and local brick-and-mortar shops. But rapid turnover in the running shoe market means that you can sometimes save money by purchasing a prior-generation shoe. The same often goes for your local running store, although you may have to ask if a past-generation model is available. If you do decide to go this route, you’ll need to be mindful of any potential tweaks to the design between generations. Many changes are minor, while others can have a big impact on fit and performance, such as widening the toe box or full-scale redesigns of the upper and foam. When it comes to running shoe updates, keep in mind that newer isn’t always better. Finally, it’s important to understand that long-term availability is unpredictable with discontinued styles, so if you love a specific model, it’s a good idea to stock up with a few pairs while you can.
 

Road vs. Trail Running Shoes 

Despite their obvious similarities, road running and trail running are two vastly different disciplines that require their own unique set of gear (namely, shoes). As we mentioned above, road running shoes are generally lighter and more streamlined, emphasizing speed and responsiveness. On the other hand, trail running shoes have beefed-up materials, including more durable and protective uppers, increased midsole support (read: stiffer builds), and high-traction rubber that extends the lifespan of the sole. Using a road running shoe on technical trail will result in ripped uppers and blown-out soles (trust us, we’ve been there), while a trail running shoe will likely feel uncomfortable and overbuilt on pavement. 
 

There are a few hybrid models that toe the line between the two worlds, including the increased instance of gravel shoes like our top-ranked Salomon Aero Glide 3 GRVL. But keep in mind that opting for such a versatile shoe will mean compromises on both ends of the spectrum (there unfortunately isn't a perfect shoe for all conditions and types of terrain). For a breakdown of our top picks for off-road exploration, check out our article on the best trail running shoes.
Back to Our Top Running Shoe Picks  Back to Our Running Shoe Comparison Table